American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
American Journal of Educational Research. 2018, 6(1), 32-37
DOI: 10.12691/education-6-1-5
Open AccessArticle

Thinking Styles among the Arab-Minority Teachers in the Arab Education System in Israel

Jamal Abu-Hussain1, and Nadia Abu-Hussain1

1Al-Qasemi Academic, Israel

Pub. Date: January 11, 2018

Cite this paper:
Jamal Abu-Hussain and Nadia Abu-Hussain. Thinking Styles among the Arab-Minority Teachers in the Arab Education System in Israel. American Journal of Educational Research. 2018; 6(1):32-37. doi: 10.12691/education-6-1-5


This study examined the thinking styles prevalent among Arab teachers, given their status as members of a minority, in the Arab education system in Israel. Examination of thinking styles very important for predicting a person's behavior in different situations, and teachers’ thinking styles predict some of their professional behavior when at work in school. The teaching profession demands certain personal characteristics, skills, and a wide professional knowledge base together with appropriate thinking and perceptions and thinking styles are considered to be an important aspect of the teacher’s work. A central aspect of a person’s personality is their thinking style and another, parallel aspect, is their characteristics. Each of the two have their unique contribution and defining structure. A person’s thinking style is influenced by culture and social characteristics and different cultures and societies are characterized by different thinking styles. As members of a national minority in Israel, the thinking styles of Arab teachers have not been previously studied, despite the fact that Arab society is undergoing rapid change in the social, economic, political, cultural, and familial spheres and despite the fact that thinking styles of teachers have an important impact on their day-to-day work in school. It is therefore important to study this subject and to examine the prevalent thinking styles among Arab teachers given their status as a minority in the education system in Israel. The study was conducted among 185 Arab teachers who answered a questionnaire about thinking styles. Their responses were analyzed using the SPSS statistic software. The principle findings showed that the most prevalent thinking styles were Type 2 (executive, local, conservative, and oligarchic) and Type 3 (monarchic, anarchic, internal, and external). The least prevalent was Type 1 (legislative, judicial, global, liberal, and hierarchic).

thinking styles Arab teachers Arab education system in Israel

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Thinking styles, Reprinted Edition, UKA, Cambridge University Press.
[2]  Sternberg, R. J. & Zhang, L.F. (2006). Styles of thinking as a basis of differentiated instruction. Theory into Practice, 44(3), 245-253.
[3]  Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Threefold model of intellectual style. Education Psychology Review, 17(1), 91-110.
[4]  Smith, J. (2002). Learning style: Fashion fad or lever for change? The application of learning style theory to inclusive curriculum delivery innovations. Education and Teaching international, 39(1), 63-70.
[5]  Alkudat, M., & El-Mekdadi, H. (2008). Prevalent thinking styles among a sample of students at the King Haled University based on gender, specialization and study stage variables. Journal of the Faculty of Education, Tanta University, (2) 39, 312-336. (Arabic).
[6]  Abu-Hashem, M. (2015). Thinking styles in the light of Sternberg's theory: A comparative study among two student samples in Egyptian and Saudi Arabian universities. Saudi Arabia: King Saud University. (Arabic).
[7]  Sternberg, R. J. (1995). Self Government. The theory of thinking and learning styles. Education of Thinking, 2, 21-25. [Branco Weiss Institute and the Curriculum Division of the Ministry of Education]. (Hebrew).
[8]  Zhang, L. F. (2000). Are thinking styles and personality types related? Educational Psychology, 20(3), 271-284.
[9]  Zhang, L. F. (2004). Thinking styles: University students’ preferred teaching styles and their conceptions of effective teachers. Journal of Psychology, 138(3), 233-252.
[10]  Furnham, A., Jackson, C. J., & Miller, T. (1999). Personality, learning style and work performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(6), 1113-1122.
[11]  Jackson, C. J., & Lawty-Jones, M. (1996). Explaining the overlap between personality and learning style. Personality and Individual Differences, 20(3), 293-300.
[12]  Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta-analyses of big six interests and big five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 217-239.
[13]  Roodenburg, J., Roodenburg, E., & Rayner, S. (2012). Personality and intellectual styles. In L. F. Zhang, R. J. Sternberg & S. Rayner (Eds.), Handbook of intellectual styles: Preferences in cognition, learning, and thinking (209-231). New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
[14]  Zhang, L. F. (2002). Thinking Styles and the Big Five Personality Traits. Educational Psychology, 22(1), 17-31.
[15]  Zhang, L. F. (2008). Preferences for teaching styles matter in academic achievement: Scientific and practical implications. Educational Psychology, 28, 615-625.
[16]  Rosander, P., & Bäckström, M. (2012). The unique contribution of learning approaches to academic performance, after controlling for IQ and personality: Are there gender differences? Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 820-826.
[17]  Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2009). Mainly openness: The relationship between the Big Five personality traits and learning approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 524-529.
[18]  Buluş, M. (2006). Assessment of thinking styles inventory, academic achievement and student teacher’s characteristics. Education and Science, 31(139), 35-48.
[19]  Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2010). Thinking styles and teachers’ characteristics, 37 (1), 3-12.
[20]  Yu, T. M. and Zhu, C. (2011). Relationship between teachers’ preferred teacher–student interpersonal behaviour and intellectual styles, Educational Psychology, 31(3), 301-317.
[21]  Emir, S. (2013). Contributions of teachers’ thinking styles to critical thinking dispositions (Istanbul- Fatih Sample). Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(1), 337–347.
[22]  Hader, T., & Sharif, A. (2009). Thinking styles among students at Al Musol University. Journal of the Al Musol University School of Education.10 (2), 155-180. (Arabic).
[23]  Albaqii, G. (2012). Styles of thinking and the five major personality traits among student teachers at schools of education in Jordanian universities. Hebron University Research Journal, 7(1), 107-131 (Arabic).
[24]  Abu-Hussain, J. (2015). The thinking language of elementary school teachers in the Arab education system in Israel: Implications for teacher education. Open Journal of Business and Management, 3(3), 257-264.
[25]  Grosbard, O. (2013). Babel – A guide to the East-West encounter. Beersheba: Ben Gurion University Publishing House. (Hebrew).
[26]  Fer, S. (2012). Demographic characteristics and intellectual styles. In L. Zhang, R. Sternberg & S. Rayner (Eds.). Handbook of intellectual styles (109-130). New York: Springer Publishing.
[27]  Nofal, M., & Abu Awad, P. (2012). Prevalent thinking styles based on the Theory of Self Government among students in Jordanian universities. The Journal of Studies at the Al Najah University, 26 (5), 1217-1257. (Arabic).
[28]  Hussein, A. (2011). Thinking styles among pre-school teacher training students. The Journal for Psychological Sciences, Baghdad University, 18, 240-287. (Arabic).
[29]  Bushra, Z. & Omer, M. (2013). The connection between thinking styles and anxiety and violence among university students: A prediction study. The Scientific Journal, 29 (1), 47-53.
[30]  Nassar, Y., & Yudak, Z. (2010). Thinking styles among students of professional studies in Jordan and the correlation with their academic achievements and leanings toward specialization. The Educational Journal, Kuwait, 24 (95), 323-361. (Arabic).
[31]  Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Are learning approaches and thinking styles related?: A study in two Chinese populations. Journal of Psychology, 134 (5), 469-489.
[32]  Zhang, L. F. (2001). Approaches and thinking styles in teaching. The Journal of Psychology, 135(5), 547-561.
[33]  Jaraisy, I. (2013). Psychosocial treatment in Arab society. In: M. Hovev, T. Lontal, & Y. Keten (Eds.), Social Work in Israel: Hakibbutz Hameuchad, Publishing House – Red Line. (Hebrew).
[34]  Abu-Hussain, J., & Essawi, M. (2014). School principals’ perceptions of teacher evaluation in the Arab educational system in Israel. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(2), 31-43.
[35]  Mahamid, A.P. (2012). Is traditional Arab society sufficiently prepared to cope with the success of the postmodern era? Studies – in education, society, technology and information, ORT Israel, Issue 13, 35-41. (Hebrew).
[36]  Abu-Hashem, M. (2009). The psychometric characteristics of thinking styles according to Sternberg's theory among university students. Saudi Arabia: King Saud University. (Arabic).
[37]  Zhang, L. F. (2006). Thinking styles and the big five personality traits revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1177-1187.
[38]  Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. Boston: Cambridge University Press.