Journal of Food and Nutrition Research
ISSN (Print): 2333-1119 ISSN (Online): 2333-1240 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/jfnr Editor-in-chief: Prabhat Kumar Mandal
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Journal of Food and Nutrition Research. 2022, 10(2), 164-174
DOI: 10.12691/jfnr-10-2-10
Open AccessArticle

Construction and Adulteration Detection Based on Fingerprint of Volatile Components in Hazelnut Oil

Qunxing Zhou1, Jingjing Han1, Chunmao Lyu1, , Xianjun Meng1, Jinlong Tian1 and Hui Tan1

1College of Food Science, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China

Pub. Date: February 11, 2022

Cite this paper:
Qunxing Zhou, Jingjing Han, Chunmao Lyu, Xianjun Meng, Jinlong Tian and Hui Tan. Construction and Adulteration Detection Based on Fingerprint of Volatile Components in Hazelnut Oil. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research. 2022; 10(2):164-174. doi: 10.12691/jfnr-10-2-10

Abstract

The volatile components of hazelnut oil are one of the important characteristics of hazelnut oil quality. To evaluate and identify the adulteration quality of hazelnut oil, this experiment adopts the HS – SPME/GC - MS technique combined with similarity analysis and cluster analysis and builds the standard fingerprint of volatile components in 9 samples of hazelnut oil. hazelnut oil samples are obtained from 3 kinds of hazelnut (flat hazelnut, European hazelnut, Flat-European hazelnut) by pressing method, water enzymatic method and leaching method, respectively. And on this basis, the fit of the good hazelnut oil and peanut oil adulteration model were established. The results showed that the volatile components of hazelnut oil obtained by different varieties combined with different oil preparation methods were similar. However, for flat hazelnut varieties, different preparation methods had a certain influence on the volatile components of flat hazelnut oil, and there was a certain difference among samples. When the amount of adulteration is larger, the relative error is smaller, and the proportion model of adulteration is more accurate. When the proportion of peanut oil adulteration is in the range of 20%~100%, the average relative error is 2.427%, and the relative errors are all less than 10%. In this case, model of hazelnut oil mixed with peanut oil is the most reliable model.

Keywords:
fingerprint fatty acids volatile components adulteration test GC-MS

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Dabbou, S., Issaoui, M., Brahmi, F., Nakbi, A. Changes in volatile compounds during processing of tunisian-style table olives. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, 89(2), 347-354. (2011).
 
[2]  Calvano, C. D., Aresta, A., Zambonin, C. G. Detection of hazelnut oil in extra-virgin olive oil by analysis of polar components by micro-solid phase extraction based on hydrophilic liquid chromatography and MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry. Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 45(9), 981-988. (2010).
 
[3]  Borse, B. B., Jagan Mohan Rao, L., Nagalakshmi, S., Krishnamurthy, N. Fringerprint of black teas from India: identification of the regio-specific characteristics. Food Chemistry, 79, 419-424. (2002).
 
[4]  Zheng, Y., Xin, Y., Guo, Y. Study on the fingerprint profile of Monascus products with HPLC-FD, PAD and MS. Food Chemistry, 113, 705-711. (2009).
 
[5]  Wei J, & Ma, Y. Similarity between Excel and chromatographic fingerprint of traditional Chinese medicine. Journal of Kunming Teachers College, (04):110-112 (2007).
 
[6]  Shi, G, OuYang., Preliminary Study on Tea Aroma Fingerprint and Feature Recognition. Shandong Agricultural University (2011).
 
[7]  García-González, D. L., Mannina, L., D’Imperio, M., Segre, A. L., Aparicio R. Using 1H and 13C NMR techniques and artificial neural networks to detect the adulteration of olive oil with hazelnut oil. European Food Research & Technology, 219(5), 545-548. (2004).
 
[8]  Azadmarddamirchi, S. Review of the use of phytosterols as a detection tool for adulteration of olive oil with hazelnut oil. Food Additives & Contaminants, 27(1), 1-10. (2010).
 
[9]  Vlahov, G. Quantitative 13C NMR method using the DEPT pulse sequence for the detection of olive oil adulteration with soybean oil. Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry, 35(13), S8-S12. (2015).
 
[10]  Benincasa C,Russo A, Romano E. Chemical and sensory analysis of some egyptian virgin olive oils [J].International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition,2011 (01): 1427-1436.
 
[11]  Jabeur, H., Zribi, A., Makni, J., Rebai, A., Abdelhedi, R., Bouaziz, M. Detection of Chemlali Extra-Virgin Olive Oil Adulteration Mixed with Soybean Oil, Corn Oil, and Sunflower Oil by Using GC and HPLC. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 62(21), 4893-4904. (2014).
 
[12]  Paraschos, S., Magiatis, P., Gikas, E., Smyrnioudis, L., Skaltsounis, A. Quality profile determination of Chios mastic gum essential oil and detection of adulteration in mastic oil products with the application of chiral and non-chiral GC-MS analysis. Fitoterapia, 114(12), 12-17. (2016).
 
[13]  Zhang, L., Shuai, Q., Li, P., Zhang, Q., Ma, F., Zhang, W., Ding, X. Ion mobility spectrometry fingerprints: A rapid detection technology for adulteration of sesame oil. Food Chemistry, 192(17), 60-66. (2016).
 
[14]  Garrido-Delgado, R., Munoz-Perez, M., Arce, L. Detection of adulteration in extra virgin olive oils by using UV-IMS and chemometric analysis. Food Control, 85(9), 292-299. (2018).
 
[15]  Georgouli, K., Martinez Del Rincon, J., Koidis, A. Continuous statistical modelling for rapid detection of adulteration of extra virgin olive oil using mid infrared and Raman spectroscopic data. Food Chemistry, 217, 735-742. (2017).