Sustainable Energy
ISSN (Print): 2372-2134 ISSN (Online): 2372-2142 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/rse Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Sustainable Energy. 2017, 5(1), 26-31
DOI: 10.12691/rse-5-1-4
Open AccessArticle

Design and Testing of an Optimized Anaerobic Digestion System

Oumarou M. Ben1, , Yakubu B. Ahmad1, Abubakar A. Bukar2 and Babagana M. Tela3

1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria

2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ramat polytechnic, Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria

3Nigerian Nuclear Regulatory Authority, Abuja, Nigeria

Pub. Date: September 19, 2017

Cite this paper:
Oumarou M. Ben, Yakubu B. Ahmad, Abubakar A. Bukar and Babagana M. Tela. Design and Testing of an Optimized Anaerobic Digestion System. Sustainable Energy. 2017; 5(1):26-31. doi: 10.12691/rse-5-1-4

Abstract

This paper presents the design and testing of an optimized anaerobic digestion system by focussing on the thermal, mechanical and chemical aspects of the anaerobic digestion process parameters such as temperature, organic loading rates, air tightness and mixing. Eleven pilot batch biogas digesters were fabricated based on an already existing design and using locally available construction materials. Cow dung and poultry droppings were used as feed materials. The digesters were tested and ran for twelve months. Pressure buildup in the digesters started 24 hours after the initial loading, while combustible gas production was noticed after 72 hours. Tests results showed that the highest biogas yields were produced by poultry ratios 5, 6 and 7. A 7.1°C monthly average increase in temperature was observed during the period of study. The gas produced was found to be burning cleanly with a blue flame and no smoke. The optimum cow dung/ poultry droppings ratio for better anaerobic digestion performance was obtained and found to fall between 1.4 and 1.6 g VS/L under near thermophilic conditions. Complete digestion of the feed was accomplished within 14 days of hydraulic retention time. Improved biogas generation would greatly influence sustainable development, waste management and economic development in affected communities.

Keywords:
anaerobic digestion biogas yield process optimization temperature mixing organic loading rate

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

Figure of 3

References:

[1]  Oumarou M. B., Dauda M. and Sulaiman A.T. (2011). Design and Mathematical Modelling of Low CV Municipal Solid Wastes incinerator, Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Solid Waste Technology and Management, Philadelphia PA USA. March 27-30, pp: 23-35.
 
[2]  Christian Wolf, Sean Mcloone and Micheal Bongards (2009). Biogas Plant control and Optimization using Computational Intelligence methods; Automatisierungstechnik, No 57; pp: 638-650 (English version).
 
[3]  Qdais H. Abu, Bani Hani K. and Shatnawi N. (2009). Modelling and Optimization of biogas production from a waste digester using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm; Resources, Conservation and Recycling Journal; www.elsevier.com.
 
[4]  Nagamani B. and Ramasamy (2009). Biogas production technology: An Indian perspective; Fermentation Laboratory; Department of Environmental Sciences, Tamil nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
 
[5]  Francesco Fantozzi and Cinzia Buratti (2009). Biogas production from different substrates in an experimental continuously Stirred Tank Reactor anaerobic digester; Bioresource Technology, No. 100, pp: 5783-5789; www.elsevier.com
 
[6]  Do Minh Hai and Dam Quang Han (2010) Optimization of Household Composite Biogas project; Energy and Environment partnership (EEP); www.eepmekong.org; Accessed on 25 November, 2012.
 
[7]  He Qiang, Chris Cox D., Reese DeBlois, Hawkins Shawn A., Hsu Julia et al. (2010) Final Report: An innovative Design for anaerobic Co-digestion of Animal Wastes for Sustainable Development in Rural Communities; Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) project; University of Tennessee- Knoxville USA.
 
[8]  Oumarou M. B. and Dauda M. (2010). Design of a Biogas Generator for Use in Semiarid Regions, Continental Journal of Renewable Energy, Vol. (1), 1, pp.: 1-8
 
[9]  Jianzheng li, Ajay Kumar Jha, Junguo He, Qiaoying Ban, Sheng Chang and Peng Wang (2011). Assessment of the effects of dry anaerobic co-digestion of cow dung with waste water sludge on biogas yield and biodegradability; International Journal of the physical Sciences Vol. 6 (15), pp:3723-3732, August 4.
 
[10]  Challen Urbanic J.M., VanOpstal B. and Parker A. (2011). Anaerobic Digestion of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW)- Full scale Vs Laboratory Results; The Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management, Vol. 37, No.1, pp:33-39, February.
 
[11]  Nnabuchi M. N., Akubuko F. O, Augustine C. and G. Z. Ugwu (2012). Assessment of the effect of co-digestion of chicken dropping and cow dung on biogas generation; International Research Journal of Engineering Science, Technology and Innovation (IRJESTI), Vol. 1(9); pp. 238-243, December 2012.
 
[12]  Qasaimeh Ahmad, Elektorowicz Maria and Jasiuk Iwona (2012). Investigation of biogas Transport in hydrophobic permeable medium for biocells; The Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management, Vol. 38, No.3; pp:157-168, August.
 
[13]  Kacpzak A., Krzytek L. and Ledakowicz S. (2012). Optimization of Biogas production yield by co-digesting energy crops with cheese whey and glycerine fraction in different configurations; European Union Operational Programme Innovative Economy publication; www.
 
[14]  Joachim Clemens (2012). How to optimize the Biogas process according to Process Control Monitoring Data in Biogas Plants; gewitra GmbH, Karlrobert- Kreiten- Straβe 13, D-53115 Bonn, Germany.
 
[15]  Aremu, M. O and Agarry, S. E. (2013). Enhanced Biogas Production from Poultry Droppings Using Corn-Cob and Waste Paper as Co-Substrate; International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST), Vol. 5 No.02, February 2013, pp.:247-253.
 
[16]  Oluwaleye, Iyiola Olusola and Awogbemi, Omojola (2013). Comparative Study of the Effects of Sawdust from Two Species of Hard Wood and Soft Wood as Seeding Materials on Biogas Production; American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), Vol. 02, Issue-01, pp.:16-21.
 
[17]  Jacob S. Ibrahim, Alex O. Edeoja and Samuel J. Aliyu (2015). A Comparative Study of Biogas Yield from Various Brewery Wastes and Their Blends with Yam Peels; Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy, Vol.5, No.11; pp.:38-46.
 
[18]  Hannah John and Stephens R. C. 1991. Mechanics of Machines: Advance theory and examples; 2nd edition, Edward Arnold, SI units.
 
[19]  Moeller Lucie, Goersch Kati, Neuhaus Jurgen, Andreas Zehnsdorf and Roland Amo Mueller (2012). Comparative review of foam formation in biogas plants and ruminant bloat; Energy, Sustainability and Society; Vol. 2, No: 12.