American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2015, 3(9), 1138-1141
DOI: 10.12691/education-3-9-11
Open AccessArticle

Does Technology Make a Difference in Student Success in an Accounting Classroom?

Cindy Greenman1, and Karuri Mwangi1

1Business Administration, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, Arizona

Pub. Date: August 28, 2015

Cite this paper:
Cindy Greenman and Karuri Mwangi. Does Technology Make a Difference in Student Success in an Accounting Classroom?. American Journal of Educational Research. 2015; 3(9):1138-1141. doi: 10.12691/education-3-9-11

Abstract

This study compares the academic success of students enrolled in two separate sections of an introductory accounting course. One course taught in a tradition classroom with little technology assistance and the other with a much greater amount of technology available to the students. The goal of this quantitative research was the investigation of a relationship existing between the amount of technology used in the accounting classroom and the success of the students as shown through the scores on their assignments, quizzes and tests. Sixty six students from various degree programs from a private university in the Southwest enrolled in 2 separate sections of a beginning accounting course. There were 31 participants in the morning section and 35 participants in the afternoon section. Both classes utilized the same textbook, the same online homework and quiz requirements, and had access to the class website on the university’s learning management system. Findings showed there is statistical significance at the .05 level, between the traditional classroom and the advanced technology classroom in some areas. The Standard classroom scored significantly higher in the average test, quiz, and midterm exam scores; while the advanced technology classroom scored significantly higher in the percentage of homework completed and the percentage of extra credit completed. There was no significant difference in the average final exam grade, the percentage of attendance, or the overall final score in the class.

Keywords:
technology education accounting classroom

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  De Lange P., Suwardy T. & Mavondo F., “Integrating a virtual learning environment into an introductory accounting course: determinants of student motivation, Accounting Education,” An International Journal, 12:1, 1-14, 2003.
 
[2]  Huneycutt, T., “Technology in the Classroom: The Benefits of Blended Learning.” National Math & Science Initiative, October 8, 2013.
 
[3]  Junco, R. Cotton, S., “The relationship b etween multitasking and academic performance.” Journal of Computers & Education, 59(4), 2012, 5050-514.
 
[4]  Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G., “Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies.” Computers & Education Journal, (56), 429-440, 2011.
 
[5]  McGarr, O. “A review of podcasting in higher education: Its influence on the traditional lecture.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 309-321, 2009.
 
[6]  Obaidat, A. N., & Alqatamin, R. M. “Integrating information technology (IT) into accounting courses.” International Journal of Business and Management, 6(10), 205-212, 2011.
 
[7]  Porter, A., “The Problem with Technology in Schools.” Washington PostJune 28, 2013.
 
[8]  Post, T.., “Teachers say Digital Technology Helps and Hurts Student Writintg.” MPR News, July 23, 2013.
 
[9]  Rottmann, M.., “Technology in the Classroom: Does it Help or Hurt.” Thesis Magazine, June 8, 2015.
 
[10]  Senik, R., & Broad, M., “Information technology skills development for accounting graduates: Intervening conditions.” International Education Studies, 4(2), 105-110, 2011.