Teacher Supply and Demand: The School Level Perspective

Smadar Donitsa-Schmidt^1, and Ruth Zuzovsky¹

¹Kibbutzim College of Education, Technology and the Arts, Tel-Aviv, Israel

Cite this paper:
Smadar Donitsa-Schmidt and Ruth Zuzovsky. Teacher Supply and Demand: The School Level Perspective. American Journal of Educational Research. 2014; 2(6):420-429. doi: 10.12691/education-2-6-14

Abstract

This study seeks to investigate the teacher shortage from the school perspective. It was guided by the assumption that activities occurring on the micro level, i.e., strategies implemented by school principals in order to cope with the shortage, mask the situation. Following this assumption the study aimed to reveal these strategies and their impact on teaching and learning in schools. The research methodology included surveys of school principals and regional inspectors and examination over two years of job advertisements appearing on teacher union internet sites. Findings reveal an ongoing search for teachers throughout the school year and a balance between supply and demand toward the beginning of the school year. The most common strategies used by principals to cope with the demand are increasing teaching loads of existing teachers, hiring under-qualified and uncertified teachers, and employing temporary teachers for long periods of time. These findings redirect the problem of a quantitative teacher shortage toward the problem of a hidden shortage that relates to the quality of the teaching force.

Keywords:
teacher shortage supply and demand school level perspective

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Santiago, Paulo. 2002. Teacher Demand and Supply: Improving Teaching Quality and Addressing Teacher Shortages. OECD Publishing.
[2]	Schleicher, Andreas 2012. Preparing Teachers and Developing School Leaders for the 21st Century: Lessons from around the World: OECD Publishing.
[3]	Eurydice. 2002. The Teaching Profession in Europe: Profile, Trends, and Concerns. Teacher Supply and Demand at General Lower Secondary Level. Key Topics in Education in Europe. Brussels: European Commission / Eurydice.
[4]	Ingersoll, Richard M. 2003a. Out-of-Field Teaching and the Limits of Teacher Policy. Report of the Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy and The Consortium for Policy Research in Education 32, University of Pennsylvania.
[5]	Ingersoll, Richard M, and David Perda. 2010. “Is the Supply of Mathematics and Science Teachers Sufficient?” American Educational Research Journal 47 (3): 563-94.
[6]	Ehrenberg, Ronald G., and Robert S. Smith. 1997. Modern Labor Economics. 6th ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
[7]	Guarino, Cassandra M, Lucrecia Santibanez, and Glenn A Daley. 2006. “Teacher Recruitment and Retention: A Review of the Recent Empirical Literature.” Review of Educational Research 76 (2): 173-208.
[8]	King Rice, Jennifer, Christopher Roellke, Dina Sparks, and Tammy Kolbe. 2009. “Piecing Together the Teacher Policy Landscape: A Policy Problem Typology.” The Teachers College Record 111 (2): 511-46.
[9]	Cannata, Marisa. 2010. “Understanding the Teacher Job Search Process: Espoused Preferences and Preferences in Use.” Teachers College Record 112 (12): 2889-934.
[10]	Ingersoll, Richard M. 2003b. “The Teacher Shortage: Myth or Reality?” Educational Horizons 81: 146-52.
[11]	Stolzenberg, Ross M. 1978. “Bringing the Boss Back In: Employer Size, Employee Schooling, and Socioeconomic Achievement.”American Sociological Review 43 (6): 813-28.
[12]	Ingersoll, Richard M. 1999. “The Problem of Underqualified Teachers in American Secondary Schools.” Educational Researcher 28 (2): 26-37.
[13]	Liu, Edward, Joseph G Rosenstein, Aubrie E Swan, and Deena Khalil. 2008. “When Districts Encounter Teacher Shortages: The Challenges of Recruiting and Retaining Mathematics Teachers in Urban Districts.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 7 (3): 296-323.
[14]	Yogev, Abraham. 2006. “The Dovrat Report and the Teachers: For Whom Will the Bells Toll?” In Toward an Educational Revolution, edited by Dan Inbar, 177-84. Jerusalem & Tel Aviv: The Van Leer Jerusalem Institute and Hakibbutz Hameuchad (Hebrew).
[15]	CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) 2007. Forecast for the Teaching Force in the Educational System, 2006-2012. Jerusalem (Hebrew).
[16]	CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) 2010. Statistical Abstract of Israel 2010 No. 61. Jerusalem (Hebrew).
[17]	CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) 2006b. The Teaching Force in the Educational System, 1991-2006. Jerusalem (Hebrew).
[18]	Kfir, Drora, and Tamar Ariav. 2008. “Introduction.” In The Crisis in Teacher Education: Reasons, Problems and Possible Solutions, edited by Drora Kfir and Tamar Ariav, 9-15. Jerusalem & Tel Aviv: The Van Leer Jerusalem Institute and Hakibbutz Hameuchad (Hebrew).
[19]	CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) 2006a. Entrance of Teacher Training College Graduates into the Teaching Force, 1990-2000. Jerusalem (Hebrew).
[20]	CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) 2011. Statistical Abstract of Israel 2011 No. 62. Jerusalem (Hebrew).
[21]	CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) 2009. Media Release: Teacher Shortage Projections. Jerusalem (Hebrew).
[22]	Jacob, Brian A. 2007. “The Challenges of Staffing Urban Schools with Effective Teachers.” The Future of Children 17 (1): 129-53.
[23]	Jacob, Brian A, and Lars Lefgren. 2008. “Can Principals Identify Effective Teachers? Evidence on Subjective Performance Evaluation in Education.” Journal of Labor Economics 26 (1): 101-36.
[24]	Blass, Nachum. 2010. “Is There a Shortage of Teachers? Policy Paper 14.” Jerusalem: Taub Center for Social Policy Studies in Israel (Hebrew).
[25]	State Comptroller of Israel. 2013. Aspects of Manpower Management in the Education System. Annual Report 63c (Fiscal Year 2012). Jerusalem (Hebrew).
[26]	Worgan, Yuval., and Itay. Fidelman. 2008. Teacher Shortage in the Educational System. Jerusalem: Government Research Center (Hebrew).
[27]	Donitsa-Schmidt, S. & Weinberger, J. (in press). Do alternative teacher-education programs manage to attract different candidates and students? Journal of Teacher Development.
[28]	Ingersoll, Richard M, and Henry May. 2012. “The Magnitude, Destinations, and Determinants of Mathematics and Science Teacher Turnover.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 34 (4): 435-64.
[29]	Mitchell, Rosamond, Florence Myles, and Emma Marsden. 2013. Second Language Learning Theories. London: Routledge.
[30]	CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) 2012b. Statistical Abstract of Israel 2012 No. 63. Jerusalem (Hebrew).
[31]	U.S. Department of Education. 2009. Teacher Shortage Areas Nationwide Listing 1990-91 to 2009-10. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
[32]	Ben-Peretz, Miriam, Estie Yankelevitch, Madene Shachar, and Meyran Boniel-Nissim. 2006. An Examination of the Roles of Teachers in Israeli Elementary Schools Compared to Other Countries. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education (Hebrew).
[33]	Weisblay, Etti. 2012. Correspondence between Teacher Discipline and the School Subjects Taught by Teachers: Situation Report. Jerusalem: The Knesset Research & Information Center (Hebrew).
[34]	CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) 2012a. Number of Teaching Hours in Secondary Schools. Jerusalem (Hebrew).
[35]	Donitsa-Schmidt, S., Inbar, O. and Shohamy, E. (2004). The effects of teaching spoken Arabic on students’ attitudes and motivation in Israel. Modern Language Journal, 88 (2), 218-229.
[36]	Boe, Erling E. 2006. “Long-Term Trends in the National Demand, Supply, and Shortage of Special Education Teachers.” The Journal of Special Education 40 (3): 138-50.
[37]	Lavian, Rivka Hillel. 2013. “You and I Will Change the World” Student Teachers' Motives for Choosing Special Education.” World Journal of Education 3 (4).
[38]	Arbiv-Elyashiv, Rinat, and Varda Zimmerman. 2013. “Why Do Teachers Leave Teaching?” Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Teacher Education, Changing Reality through Education, at the David Yellin Academic College of Education, Jerusalem.
[39]	Jerald, Craig D, and Richard M Ingersoll. 2002. All Talk, No Action: Putting an End to out-of-Field Teaching. Washington, DC: The Education Trust.
[40]	McConney, Andrew, and Anne Price. 2009. “Teaching out-of-Field in Western Australia.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 34 (6): 6.
[41]	Pillay, Hitendra K, Richard Goddard, and Lynn A Wilss. 2005. “Well-Being, Burnout and Competence: Implications for Teachers.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 30 (2): 22-33.
[42]	Dee, Thomas S, and Sarah R Cohodes. 2008. “Out-of-Field Teachers and Student Achievement Evidence from Matched-Pairs Comparisons.” Public Finance Review 36 (1): 7-32.
[43]	Loeb, Susanna, Demetra Kalogrides, and Tara Béteille. 2012. Effective Schools: Teacher Hiring, Assignment, Development, and Retention. Working Paper No. 17177. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.