Student Attitudes towards Chemistry: an Examination of Choices and Preferences

Jassem G. Mahdi^1,

¹Department of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Shaqra University, Saudi Arabia

Cite this paper:
Jassem G. Mahdi. Student Attitudes towards Chemistry: an Examination of Choices and Preferences. American Journal of Educational Research. 2014; 2(6):351-356. doi: 10.12691/education-2-6-3

Abstract

Chemistry is one of the foundations of science, technology and industry. It forms the fundamentals of the life sciences. This study, aims to investigate what make students choose or not to choose Chemistry and what are the main factors that contribute to the understanding of Chemistry as a subject? Four aspects were used to appraise students’ attitudes towards Chemical education, including student’s perceptions toward Chemistry, the concept of chemical knowledge and its understanding, application of chemical knowledge and understanding and career, help and school, using a questionnaire technique. Respondents indicated that students were positive with most statements to support their education, despite the perception that Chemistry is a difficult subject. Furthermore, respondents indicated that Chemistry is an interesting and not a boring subject, which certainly demands more attention to raise its status. Having help at home and from teachers were important factors that play significant roles in the student’s preference to Chemistry but there is a disfavoured option for various careers, which may hinder student’s interest in Chemistry.

Keywords:
Chemistry education perception concepts college quantitative approach

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	De Jong, O. Crossing the borders: Chemical education research and teaching practice Processing. U. Chem. Ed. 4, 2000.
[2]	Breuer S.W. Does Chemistry have a future? U. Chem. Ed. 6, 13-16, 2002.
[3]	William S. Price and John O. Hill. Raising the Status of Chemistry Education. U. Chem. Ed. 8 (1), 13-20, 2004.
[4]	I was never any good at Chemistry; I never understood atoms and molecules; I enjoyed splashing about in the laboratory, but I did not understand what I was doing p. 34.
[5]	Reece, I. and Walker, S. Teaching, training and learning: A practical guide. 5th Ed., Business Education Publishers Limited, Great Britain, 2003.
[6]	Festus, C. Improving Students’ Performance and Attitude towards Chemistry through Problem-Based-Solving Techniques (PBST). Inter. J. Academic Res. in Progressive Education and Develop. January, 1 (1), 167-174, 2012.
[7]	Bransford, J.D., Brown, AL. and Cocking, R.R. How to learn. National Research Council, 1999. [Accessed 20/3/2006].
[8]	Burewicz, A. and Miranowicz, M. Individualisation of student’s tasks in blended learning course of information technology for chemists with dynamic instructions. Recent Research Developments in Learning Technologies, 2005. http://www.formatex.org/micte2005/339.pdf. [Accessed 20/3/2006].
[9]	Bretz, S.L. Human Constructivism and Meaningful learning, Online Symposium: Piaget, constructivism, and beyond. J. Chem. Educ, 78, 1107, 2001.
[10]	Gunter, B. Media Research Methods. London: Sage Publications, 2000.
[11]	Oppenheim, A.N. Questionnaire design and attitude measurement, London: Printer, 1992.
[12]	Cohen, L. and Manion, L. Research Methods in Education. (4th ed.). London: Routledge, 1995.
[13]	Hughes, M. Comparative educational administration. In N. J. Boya (ed.). Handbook of Research on Educational Administration: a project of the American Educational Research Association. New York: Longman, 1988.
[14]	Doyle, M. The Value of Research in Undergraduate Chemistry education, 2006. http://urc.arizona.edu/The%20Value%20of%20Research%20inUndergraduate%20Chemistry%20Education.cfm [Accessed 20/3/2006].