Journal of Food and Nutrition Research
ISSN (Print): 2333-1119 ISSN (Online): 2333-1240 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/jfnr Editor-in-chief: Prabhat Kumar Mandal
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Journal of Food and Nutrition Research. 2023, 11(9), 557-563
DOI: 10.12691/jfnr-11-9-1
Open AccessArticle

Adoption of Efficient Varieties Management for Improving Sugar Content Moisture Content, and Fermentation Parameters and Wine Quality of Different Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)

Wang Jian Qiang1, Liu Yong1, Xue Xiaoyan2, Wubo Yangwei1, , Zhang xiao juan1, Hao Yan fang1, Bai Hongyan1 and Fida Noor3

1Sorghum Research Institute, Shanxi Agricultural University, Shanxi Key Laboratory of Sorghum Genetic and Germplasm Innovation

2Department of Economics and Management, Beijing Vocational College of Agriculture, Beijing 100093

3College of Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agriculture University, Taigu 030801, Shanxi, China

Pub. Date: September 07, 2023

Cite this paper:
Wang Jian Qiang, Liu Yong, Xue Xiaoyan, Wubo Yangwei, Zhang xiao juan, Hao Yan fang, Bai Hongyan and Fida Noor. Adoption of Efficient Varieties Management for Improving Sugar Content Moisture Content, and Fermentation Parameters and Wine Quality of Different Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). Journal of Food and Nutrition Research. 2023; 11(9):557-563. doi: 10.12691/jfnr-11-9-1

Abstract

The water holding capacity, light transmittance, solubility and swelling power of waxy sorghum grain starch were higher than those of non–waxy sorghum. The six crystal structure types of sorghum starch were all type A. The absorption peak of waxy sorghum at a diffraction angle of 20.0° was weaker than that of non–waxy sorghum grain starch. The sorghum starch particle size ranged from 5 to 23 μm. 6 kinds of sorghum starch granules all showed typical "Maltese cross" by polarized light.and there were two clusters The P1 value of LZ-19 (P1=66.5%) was the largest, which showed that the starch granules were larger and more complex; the P1 of waxy JN-3 (P1=33.8%). The value was the smallest, the starch granules were smaller, the granules were simpler, and the distribution was scattered, but there was no significant difference between waxy and non–waxy rice. The starting temperature, ending temperature and enthalpy value of waxy sorghum grain starch slurry were higher than those of non–waxy, and there were significant differences between waxy and non–waxy sorghum, indicating that the starch structure of waxy sorghum grain was more compact and orderly than that of non–waxy sorghum. It was easier to gelatinize, and the required heat was higher. The gelatinization temperature, gelatinization time and valley viscosity of waxy sorghum starch were higher than those of non–waxy sorghum, and there were significant differences in the gelatinization retrogradation characteristics of waxy and non–waxy sorghum starch.

Keywords:
sorghum yield grain quality physical and chemical properties starch properties fermentation characteristics

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Yan S B, Wang S C, Wei G G, Zhang K G. 2015. Investigation of the main parameters during the fermentation of Chinese Luzhou-flavour liquor. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 121(1): 145-154.
 
[2]  Mekbib F. 2008. Genetic erosion of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) in the centre of diversity,Ethiopia. Genetic Resources & Crop Evolution, 55(3): 351-364.
 
[3]  Aina A J, Falade K O, Akingbala J O, Titus P. 2012. Physicochemical properties of Caribbean sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L) Lam) starches, Food Bioprocess Technol. 5 (2) 576-583.
 
[4]  Eugenia S M, Edel L A, Teresa P G. 2013. Study of the physicochemical and functional characterization of quinoa and kañiwa starches. Starch/Stärke, 65(11-12): 976-983.
 
[5]  Chen M B, Yang D D, Qian Z W, D Zhen, Fang S L. 2010. Analysis of microorganisms andphysicochemical properties in zaopei during the fermentation of chinese zhijiang-flavor liquor. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9(25), 3874-3882 Mekbib F. 2008. Genetic erosion of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) in the centre of diversity, Ethiopia. Genetic Resources & Crop Evolution, 55(3): 351-364.
 
[6]  Uarrota V G, Amante E R, Demiate I M, Vieirad F, Delgadillod I, Maraschina M. 2013. Physicochemical,thermal, and pasting properties of flours and starches of eight Brazilian maize landraces (Zea mays L.). Food Hydrocolloidscolloids, 30(2): 614-624.
 
[7]  Ambigaipalan P, Hoover R, Donner E, Liu Q, Jaiswal S, Chibbar R, K K M, Nantanga, K. 2011. Structure of faba bean, black bean and pinto bean starches at different levels of granule organization and their physicochemical properties. Food Research International, 44(9): 2962-2974.
 
[8]  Beta T, Corket H. 2001, Genetic and environmental variation in sorghum starch properties. Journal of Science, 34: 261-268.
 
[9]  Chen Z, Schols H A, Voragen A G J. 2003. Physicochemical proper-ties of starches obtained from three varieties Chinese sweet potatoes. Journal of Food Science, 68(2): 431-437.
 
[10]  Cheng F M, Zhong L J, Zhao N C. 2005. Temperature induced changes in the starch components and biosynthetic enzymes of two rice varieties. Plant Growth Regulation, 46(5): 87-95.
 
[11]  Hu XL, Du H, Ren C, Xu Y. 2016. Illuminating anaerobic microbial community and co-occurrence patterns across a quality gradient in Chinese liquor fermentation pit muds. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 82(8): 2506-2515.
 
[12]  Zhao. 2015. Characterization of volatile aroma compounds in different brewing barley cultivars.Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 95(5).
 
[13]  Niba L L. 2002. Resistant Starch: Apotential Functional Food lngredent. Nutrition & Food Science, 32:62-67.
 
[14]  Raina C S, Singh S, Bawa A S, Saxena D C. 2006. Some characteristics of acetylated, cross-linked and dual modified Indian rice starches. European Food Research and Technology, 223: 561-570.
 
[15]  Suhendro E L, Mcdonough C M, Rooney L W, Waniska R D, Yetneberk S. 1998. Effects of processing conditions and sorghum cultivar on alkaline-processed snacks. Cereal Chemistry, 75(2), 187-193.
 
[16]  Torruco-Uco J, Betancur-Ancona D. 2007. Physicochemical and functional properties of makal. (Xanthosoma yucatanensis) starch. Food Chemistry, 101(4): 1319-1326.
 
[17]  White P J, Abbas I, Pollak L, Johnson L. 1990. Intra-and interpopulation variability of thermal properties of maize starch. Cereal Chemistry, 67: 70-73.
 
[18]  Zhang Yanyan, Zhu Xiaoyu, Li Xiangzhen, Tao Yong, Jia Jia, He Xiaohong. 2017. The process-related dynamics of microbial community during a simulated fermentation of Chinese strong-flavored liquor. BMC microbiology, 17(1).