Journal of Food and Nutrition Research
ISSN (Print): 2333-1119 ISSN (Online): 2333-1240 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/jfnr Editor-in-chief: Prabhat Kumar Mandal
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Journal of Food and Nutrition Research. 2020, 8(1), 26-32
DOI: 10.12691/jfnr-8-1-4
Open AccessArticle

Impact of Non-nutritive Sweeteners on the Sensory Profile and Acceptance of a Functional Tamarind Beverage

Rafael Sousa Lima1, and Helena Maria André Bolini1

1Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Campinas, Campinas, 13083-862, Brazil

Pub. Date: January 17, 2020

Cite this paper:
Rafael Sousa Lima and Helena Maria André Bolini. Impact of Non-nutritive Sweeteners on the Sensory Profile and Acceptance of a Functional Tamarind Beverage. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research. 2020; 8(1):26-32. doi: 10.12691/jfnr-8-1-4

Abstract

The current consumer aversion for sucrose excess and the use of artificial ingredients has encouraged the production of beverages that preserve the fruit's wholeness and aggregate nutritional values, such as the availability of dietary fibers. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of non-nutritive sweeteners on the sensory profile and acceptance of a functional tamarind beverage. The tests were applied in individual cabins, with 30 mL samples, served in 3 random digits coded plastic cups, presented in monadic balanced complete blocks. Ideal sweetness, equi-sweetness, quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA) and consumer affective tests were performed, and results were analyzed through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's means test (p < 0.05). The ideal sweetness of the reference sample was 10.70% of sucrose. For the quantitative descriptive analysis, 17 descriptive terms for the observed perceptions of the product were used. Most of the used sweeteners, except for stevia, showed no significant difference for perceptions tamarind aroma and flavor. The neohesperidin sample showed a greater intensity of refreshment sensation, while the sucrose and sucralose samples presented lower perception of bitter taste. The stevia sample had the least preference and greater perception of bitter taste, sweet and bitter aftertaste. Stevia and neohesperidin samples obtained lower acceptance by consumers regarding the overall impression, while sucralose had the best sweetness acceptance. Also, the astringency perception of the product interfered negatively in the acceptance of the samples.

Keywords:
sensory analysis quantitative descriptive analysis sweeteners functional food tropical food

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  World Health Organization, Global Report on Diabetes, World Health Organization, 2016.
 
[2]  J. Jacobsen, New product development outlook: natural replaces organic as top attribute, Beverage Ind., 2016.
 
[3]  ITAL, Brasil Ingredients Trends 2020, ITAL, 2016.
 
[4]  B. Harfmann, Consumers opt for healthy, functional beverages, Beverage Ind., 2018.
 
[5]  ITAL, Brasil Beverage Trends 2020, ITAL, 2016.
 
[6]  T.U. Passos, Consumo alimentar cearense: índice glicêmico e carga glicêmica de alimentos regionais e impacto potencial no risco de doenças crônicas não transmissíveis, Thesis, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, 2012.
 
[7]  S. Natukunda, J.H. Muyonga, I.M. Mukisa, “Effect of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) seed on antioxidant activity, phytocompounds, physicochemical characteristics, and sensory acceptability of enriched cookies and mango juice”, Food Sci. Nutr. 4 (4), 494-507, October 2015.
 
[8]  A. Jain, S. Bhadoriya, A. Ganeshpurkar, J. Narwaria, G. Rai, “Tamarindus indica: Extent of explored potential”, Pharmacogn. Rev. 5 (9), 73-81, January 2011.
 
[9]  D. de Beer, C.E. Pauck, M. Aucamp, W. Liebenberg, N. Stieger, M. van der Rijst, E. Joubert, "Phenolic and physicochemical stability of a functional beverage powder mixture during storage: effect of the microencapsulant inulin and food ingredients", J. Sci. Food Agric. 98 (8), 2925-2934, January 2018.
 
[10]  A. Papathanasopoulos, M. Camilleri, "Dietary Fiber Supplements: Effects in Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome and Relationship to Gastrointestinal Functions", Gastroenterology. 138 (1), 65-72, January 2010.
 
[11]  Brasil. National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA), Resolução no 19, de 30 de abril de 1999, ANVISA, 1999.
 
[12]  AOAC, Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, AOAC Intl, Washington, DC, 1995.
 
[13]  E.G. Bligh, W.J. Dyer, "A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification", Can. J. Biochem. Physiol., 37 (8), 911-917, August 1959.
 
[14]  Biosystèmes, Fizz Software Solutions for Sensory and Consumer Tests, (2009).
 
[15]  M. Meilgaard, G.V. Civille, B.T. Carr, Sensory evaluation techniques, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2006.
 
[16]  H. Stone, J. Sidel, Sensory Evaluation Practices, Academic Press, 2004.
 
[17]  R.S. Cadena, H.M.A. Bolini, “Ideal and relative sweetness of high intensity sweeteners in mango nectar”, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 47 (5), 991-996, January 2012.
 
[18]  I.F. de Oliveira Rocha, H.M.A. Bolini, “Different sweeteners in passion fruit juice: Ideal and equivalent sweetness”, LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 62 (1), 861-867, Octuber 2015.
 
[19]  H.R. Moskowitz, Product testing and sensory evaluation of foods: marketing and R&D approaches, Food & Nutrition Press, Westport, 1983.
 
[20]  H.R. Moskowitz, "Ratio scales of sugar sweetness", Percept. Psychophys., 7 (5), 315-320, September 1970.
 
[21]  P. Oliver, S. Cicerale, E. Pang, R. Keast, "A Comparison of Temporal Dominance of Sensation (TDS) and Quantitative Descriptive Analysis (QDATM) to Identify Flavors in Strawberries", J. Food Sci., 83 (4), 1094-1102, January 2018.
 
[22]  H. Stone, "Example food: What are its sensory properties and why is that important?", Npj Sci. Food., 2 (11), 2017-2019, June 2018.
 
[23]  SAS Institute Inc., Statistical Analysis System (SAS), 2008.
 
[24]  R.S. Cadena, A.G. Cruz, J.A.F. Faria, H.M.A. Bolini, “Reduced fat and sugar vanilla ice creams: Sensory profiling and external preference mapping”, J. Dairy Sci., 95 (9), 4842-4850, May 2012.
 
[25]  L.L.M.M. de Melo, H.M.A. Bolini, P. Efraim, “Sensory profile, acceptability, and their relationship for diabetic/reduced calorie chocolates”, Food Qual. Prefer., 20 (2), 138-143, January 2009.
 
[26]  Addinsoft, XLSTAT statistical analysis software, 2007.
 
[27]  Brasil. National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA), Resolução RDC no 54, de 12 de novembro de 2012, ANVISA, 2012.
 
[28]  M. Carocho, P. Morales, I.C.F.R. Ferreira, “Sweeteners as food additives in the XXI century: A review of what is known, and what is to come”, Food Chem. Toxicol., 107, 302–317, July 2017.
 
[29]  J.M.P. Cardoso, H.M.A. Bolini, "Different sweeteners in peach nectar: Ideal and equivalent sweetness", Food Res. Int., 40 (10), 1249-1253, August 2007.
 
[30]  C. Piernas, S.W. Ng, B. Popkin, "Trends in purchases and intake of foods and beverages containing caloric and low-calorie sweeteners over the last decade in the United States", Pediatr. Obes., 8 (4), 294-306, August 2013.
 
[31]  M.L.F. Freitas, M.B. de L. Dutra, H.M.A. Bolini, "Development of pitanga nectar with different sweeteners by sensory analysis: ideal pulp dilution, ideal sweetness, and sweetness equivalence", Food Sci. Technol., 34 (1), 174-180, January 2014.
 
[32]  J. Okello, J.B.L. Okullo, G. Eilu, P. Nyeko, J. Obua, "Mineral composition of Tamarindus indica LINN (tamarind) pulp and seeds from different agro-ecological zones of Uganda", Food Sci. Nutr., 5 (5), 959-966, April 2017.
 
[33]  Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE), Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares 2008-2009: Análise do Consumo Alimentar Pessoal no Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, 2011.
 
[34]  B.M. Azevedo, J.M.M. Ferreira, V. Luccas, H.M.A. Bolini, "The Influence of the Rebaudioside A Content of Stevia ( Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni) on the Determination of Sweetness Equivalence in Bittersweet Chocolates, Using the Time-Intensity Analysis", J. Food Sci., 81 (12), S3006-S3014, March 2016.
 
[35]  D. Brusick, V.L. Grotz, R. Slesinski, C.L. Kruger, A.W. Hayes, "The absence of genotoxicity of sucralose", Food Chem. Toxicol., 48 (11), 3067-3072, July 2010.
 
[36]  C. Dinnella, A. Recchia, H. Tuorila, E. Monteleone, “Individual astringency responsiveness affects the acceptance of phenol-rich foods”, Appetite, 56 (3), 633-642, February 2011.
 
[37]  S. Ployon, M. Morzel, C. Belloir, A. Bonnotte, E. Bourillot, L. Briand, E. Lesniewska, J. Lherminier, E. Aybeke, F. Canon, “Mechanisms of astringency: Structural alteration of the oral mucosal pellicle by dietary tannins and protective effect of bPRPs”, Food Chem., 253, 79-87, July 2018.