Journal of Physical Activity Research
ISSN (Print): 2574-4437 ISSN (Online): 2574-4437 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/jpar Editor-in-chief: Peter Hart
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Journal of Physical Activity Research. 2017, 2(2), 112-116
DOI: 10.12691/jpar-2-2-8
Open AccessArticle

The Accuracy of Wrist-worn Heart Rate Monitors across a Range of Exercise Intensities

Paul Hough1, , Mark Glaister1 and Adam Pledger1

1School of Sport, Health & Applied Science, St Mary’s University, Twickenham, London, TW1 4SX, United Kingdom

Pub. Date: November 25, 2017

Cite this paper:
Paul Hough, Mark Glaister and Adam Pledger. The Accuracy of Wrist-worn Heart Rate Monitors across a Range of Exercise Intensities. Journal of Physical Activity Research. 2017; 2(2):112-116. doi: 10.12691/jpar-2-2-8

Abstract

Commercially available wrist-worn heart rate (HR) monitors have become increasingly popular. However, the accuracy of the devices across a range of exercise intensities is largely unknown. This study investigated the accuracy of four wrist-worn HR monitors (Apple Watch Series 1, Fitbit Charge, TomTom Touch, and Mio Fuse). Eighteen adults completed three trials on a cycle ergometer wearing a chest-worn HR monitor (Polar). Trial 1 established the HR-power output relationship, and resting and maximum HR. In trials 2 and 3, participants were fitted to an electrocardiogram (ECG) and completed a step test consisting of 5 x 3 minute stages at 40 - 80% of HR reserve (determined in trial 1) whilst wearing two wrist-worn HR monitors. Relative to ECG, there were no differences in HR between the devices during exercise (p = 0.239), and no device × exercise intensity interaction (p = 0.370). There were no instances where ECG and Polar data differed by ≥ 5 b·min-1. Conversely, there were two instances (2.2%) with the Apple, four (4.4%) with the Mio, 10 (11.1%) with the TomTom, and 19 (21.1%) with the Fitbit. A chest-worn HR monitor offers greater accuracy compared to wrist-worn devices.

Keywords:
Heart-rate accuracy fitness watch technology

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 43. 1334-1359. 2011.
 
[2]  Mann, T., Lamberts R.P. and Lambert M.I. Methods of prescribing relative exercise intensity: physiological and practical considerations, Sports Medicine, 43. 613-625. 2013.
 
[3]  Sykes K. and Roberts, A. The Chester step test-a simple yet effective tool for the prediction of aerobic capacity. Physiotherapy, 90. 183-188. 2004.
 
[4]  Kinnunen, H and Heikkilä, I. The timing accuracy of the Polar Vantage NV heart rate monitor, Journal of Sports Science, 16. S107-S110. 1998.
 
[5]  Engström, E., Ottosson, E., Wohlfart, B., Grundström, N. and Wisén, A. Comparison of heart rate measured by Polar RS400 and ECG, validity and repeatability. Advances in Physiotherapy. 14. 115-22. 2012.
 
[6]  Terbizan, D.J., Dolezal, B.A. and Albano, C. Validity of seven commercially available heart rate monitors. Measurement in Physical Education & Exercise Science, 6. 243-247. 2002.
 
[7]  Spierer, D.K., Rosen, Z., Litman, L.L. and Fujii, K. Validation of photoplethysmography as a method to detect heart rate during rest and exercise. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 39. 264-271. 2015.
 
[8]  Stahl, S.E., An, H.S., Dinkel, D.M., Noble, J.M. and Lee JM. How accurate are the wrist-based heart rate monitors during walking and running activities? Are they accurate enough? BMJ Open Sport & exercise Medicine, 2:e000106. 2016.
 
[9]  Lee, M. and Gorelick, M. Validity of the Smarthealth watch to measure heart rate during rest and exercise. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 15. 18-25. 2011.
 
[10]  Wang, R., Blackburn, G., Desai, M., Phelan, D., Gillinov, L., Houghtaling, P. and Gillinov, M. JAMA Cardiology, 2. 104-106. 2017.
 
[11]  Tanaka, H, Monahan, K.G. and Seals, D.S. Age - predicted maximal heart rate revisited. Journal of American College of Cardiology, 37. 153-156. 2001.
 
[12]  Wajciechowski, J., Gayle, R., Andrews, R. and Dintiman, G. The accuracy of radio telemetry heart rate monitor during exercise. Clinical Kinesiology, 45. 9-12. 1991.
 
[13]  Darr, K.C., Bassett, D.R., Morgan, B.J. and Thomas, D.P. Effects of age and training status on heart rate recovery after peak exercise. American Journal of Physiology, 254. H340-H343. 1988.
 
[14]  Tocco, F., Sanna, I., Mulliri, G., Magnani, S., Todde, F., Mura, R., Ghiani, G., Concu, A., Melis, F. and Crisafulli A. Heart rate unreliability during interval training recovery in middle distance runners. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 14. 466-472. 2015.
 
[15]  Cole, C.R, Blackstone, E.H., Pashkow, F.J., Snader, C.E. and Lauer, M.S. Heart rate recovery immediately after exercise as a predictor of mortality. New England Journal of Medicine, 341. 1351-1357. 1999.
 
[16]  Nanas, S., Anastasiou-Nana, M., Dimopoulos, S., Sakellariou, D., Alexopoulos, G., Kapsimalakou, S., Papazoglou, P., Tsolakis, E., Papazachou, O., Roussos, C. and Nanas J. Early heart rate recovery after exercise predicts mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. International Journal of Cardiology, 110. 393-400. 2006.
 
[17]  Beale, L., Silberbauer, J., Carter, H., Doust, J. and Brickley G. Exercise heart rate guidelines overestimate recommended intensity for chronic heart failure patients. British Journal of Cardiology, 17. 133-137. 2010.