Journal of Behavioural Economics, Finance, Entrepreneurship, Accounting and Transport
ISSN (Print): 2376-1326 ISSN (Online): 2376-1334 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/jbe Editor-in-chief: Pr. Abdelfatteh Bouri
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Journal of Behavioural Economics, Finance, Entrepreneurship, Accounting and Transport. 2015, 3(2), 71-75
DOI: 10.12691/jbe-3-2-2
Open AccessArticle

Typological Analysis of Non-technological and Technological Innovation Determinants in Tunisia

Mallek Wafa1,

1Unit of Economic Development Reaserch, University of Sfax

Pub. Date: April 29, 2015

Cite this paper:
Mallek Wafa. Typological Analysis of Non-technological and Technological Innovation Determinants in Tunisia. Journal of Behavioural Economics, Finance, Entrepreneurship, Accounting and Transport. 2015; 3(2):71-75. doi: 10.12691/jbe-3-2-2

Abstract

This paper examines on the one hand the proximity effects on ICT firm’s innovation, on the other hand it verify the similarity of technological and non technological innovation determinants. Thus, we recall the theoretical background of proximity effect on Co-localized firm’s innovation from both geographical economy and neo-institutionalism work. The results of a logistic regression, performed by a collected data from 58 Co located ICT firms within Elgazala technology Park in Tunis, shows that firm concentration, socio-economic, organizational and cognitive factors exert a favorable effect on technological and non-technological innovation. However, empirical results confirm that innovation determinants differ depending on whether it is technological or non-technological.

Keywords:
Proximity ICT Technological Innovation Non-technological innovation logistic binary regression Tunisia

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Araszkiewiez.J, Lacroix.C, Rasse. P, (2008), ”Réseaux d'innovation : enjeux de la communication au sein d'une technopole, le cas Sophia Antipolis”, Ouvrage issu d'un programme de recherche financé par le Conseil général des Alpes-Maritimes et l'ISCC, Institut des sciences de communication du CNRS.
 
[2]  Arikan A.T. (2009), “Interfirm Knowledge Exchanges and the Knowledge Creation Capability of Clusters”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 34, n°4, p.658-676.
 
[3]  Asheim B.T. et Gertler M.S. (2005), “The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems”, dans The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, sous la direction de Fagerberg J., Mowery D. C. et Nelson R. R. (coord.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, p.291-317.
 
[4]  Bahlmann M.D. and Huysman M.H. (2008), “The emergence of a knowledge-based view of clusters and its implications for cluster governance”, The Information Society, Vol. 24, n°5, p.304-318.
 
[5]  Bathelt H., Malmberg A. et Maskell P. (2004), “Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation”, Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 28, n°1, p.31-56.
 
[6]  Boquet R, Brion S et Mothe C, (2013), ”Gouvernance et innovation au sein des technopôles : le cas de savoie Technolac”, Post print hal 009151.
 
[7]  Boschma R.A. (2005), “Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment”, Regional Studies, Vol. 39, n°1, p.61-74.
 
[8]  Bourmont. M (2012), “La résolution d'un problème de multi colinéarité au sein des études portant sur les déterminants d'une publication volontaire d'informations ”, Comptabilités et innovation, Grenoble, France. pp.cd-rom. hal-00691156.
 
[9]  Breschi S. et Lissoni F. (2001), “Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey”, Industrial & Corporate Change, Vol. 10, n°4, p.975-1005.
 
[10]  Djeflat A. (2004), “National Systems of Innovation in the Mena Region”, World Bank Institute Report, Washington
 
[11]  El Elj, M, (2009). “R&D and Innovation Empirical Analysis for Tunisian Firms,” MPRA Paper 18128, University Library of Munich, Germany.
 
[12]  El Elj.M et Abdelsalem.H, (2011), ”Innovation in Tunisia: sectorial analysis”, Journées de Micro Economie Appliquée, Tunisie.
 
[13]  Feldman M.P. et Audretsch D.B. (1999), “Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition”, European Economic Review, Vol. 43, n°2, p.409-429.
 
[14]  Feldman M.P. et Florida R. (1994), “The Geographic Sources of Innovation: Technological Infrastructure and Product Innovation in the United States”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 84, n°2, p.210-229.
 
[15]  Gabsi.F, Hatem.M and Karim.K, (2008), “Innovation determiants in emrging countries: an empirical study at the Tunisian firms level”. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development (IJTLID). MPRA Paper No. 17940.
 
[16]  Hamdouch A et Depret MH. (2009), “Surveing the litterature on territorial innovation systems : a suggested interpretation framework”, SSRN, working paperss series December.
 
[17]  Harrell, F. E. (2001), Regression modeling strategies: With applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis, Springer-Verlag, New York
 
[18]  Markoff.J, (1999), “Influx of new immigrants found in Silicon Valley”, NYT, january 10.
 
[19]  Marshall A. (1920), “Industry and Trade. A Study of industrial technique and business organization and of their influences on the condition of various classes and nations”, Macmillan and Co. (1932, pour la réimpression de la 3ème édition), Londres, 874 pages.
 
[20]  Pecqueur B. (2008), “Pôles de compétitivité et spécificité de la ressource technologique : une illustration grenobloise”, Géographie, économie, société, Vol. 10, n°3, p.311-326.
 
[21]  Plunket A. et Torre A. (2009), “Les pôles de compétitivité ou le retour ambigu des déclinaisons locales de la politique industrielle française”, Economia e politica industriale, Vol. 3, p.159-177.
 
[22]  Porter M.E. (1990), “The competitive advantage of nations”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.n°Mars-Avril, p.p.73-91.
 
[23]  Porter M.E. (1998), “Clusters and the new economics of competition”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76, n°6, p.77-90.
 
[24]  Porter M.E. (2003), “The Economic Performance of Regions”, Regional Studies, Vol. 37, n°6/7, p.549-578.
 
[25]  Porter M.E. (2004), “La concurrence selon Porter”, Village Mondial, Paris.
 
[26]  Porter M.E. et Stern S. (2001), “Innovation: location matters”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 42, n°4, p.28-36.
 
[27]  Rahmouni M, Yildizoglu, (2011),”Motivations et déterminants de l’innovation technologique : un survol théorique modernes’’, document de travail GreQam, N2011-09.
 
[28]  Rahmouni, M. Ayadi, M. & Yildizoglu, M. (2007), “Sectoral Patterns of Innovation in a Developing Country: The Tunisian Case”, Working Papers of GREThA, 2007-19.
 
[29]  Rahmouni, M. Ayadi, M. & Yildizoglu, M. (2009), “Determinants of the Innovation Propensity in Tunisia: the Central Role of External Knowledge Sources”, Document de Travail du GREQAM (N° 2009-05).
 
[30]  Rallet A. et Torre. (2001), “Proximité géographique ou proximité organisationnelle ? une analyse spatiale des coopérations technologiques dans les réseaux localisés d’innovation », Économie appliquée, Tome LIV, n°1, pp. 17-29.
 
[31]  Schiliro, D, (2012). “Knowledge-Based Economies And The Institutional Environment,” Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields, ASERS Publishing, vol. 0(1), pages 42-50.
 
[32]  Tlili.A, Chkir.A, (2011), “Une analyse binomial et multinomiale de l’innovation dans un échantillon d’entreprises tunisiennes’’, ERF,17th Annual Conference :politic and economic developpement,March 20-22, Antalya, Turkey.