Effects of Different Drying Methods on the Properties of Lactoferrin

Xuena Dong^{1, 2}, Yu Liu^{1, 2}, Shengbo Yu¹, Zhao Li¹, Chunyu Wu¹, Yun Chen², ZengLi Gao² and Zhishen Mu^{1, 2,}

¹Institute of Dairy Science Research, Inner Mongolia Mengniu Dairy (Group) Co., Ltd., Hohhot, Nei mongolia, P.R.China

²Inner Mongolia Enterprise Key Laboratory of Dairy Nutrition, Health & Safety, Hohhot, Nei mongolia, P.R.China

Cite this paper:
Xuena Dong, Yu Liu, Shengbo Yu, Zhao Li, Chunyu Wu, Yun Chen, ZengLi Gao and Zhishen Mu. Effects of Different Drying Methods on the Properties of Lactoferrin. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research. 2026; 14(1):38-44. doi: 10.12691/jfnr-14-1-5

Abstract

Lactoferrin powder was produced using three different methods: freeze-drying, spray-drying, and electrostatic spray-drying, with fresh liquid lactoferrin obtained from the industry as the raw material. The study evaluated the effects of these drying methods on the antioxidant capacity, antibacterial activity, degree of denaturation, and secondary structure characteristics of lactoferrin powder. Additionally, the physical and chemical properties of the lactoferrin powders, such as moisture content, particle size distribution, and iron saturation, were examined. The findings indicated that compared to lactoferrin solution, the electrostatic spray-dried (ESDLF) and spray-dried (SDLF) powders exhibited greater denaturation and conformational changes. The α-helix content increased, and the conformation became more stable, which might result in a significant loss of functional properties. In contrast, the denaturation and conformational changes in freeze-dried lactoferrin (FDLF) powder were minimal. Moreover, FDLF powder demonstrated remarkable antibacterial and anti-inflammatory capabilities compared to ESDLF powder and SDLF powders. Notably, at a sample concentration of 10%, the antibacterial efficacy of FDLF powder reached as high as 99%. This study has revealed that the freeze-drying process was the optimal method for minimizing the denaturation rate of lactoferrin and preserving the activity of lactoferrin powder.

Keywords:
Lactoferrin Freeze-drying Spray-drying Electrostatic spray-drying Drying methods

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

References:

[1]	Z.-S. Liu, P.-W. Chen. Featured Prebiotic Agent: The Roles and Mechanisms of Direct and Indirect Prebiotic Activities of Lactoferrin and Its Application in Disease Control. Nutrients 2023, 15 (12), 2759.
[2]	S.G. Anema. Acidification of lactoferrin-casein micelle complexes in skim milk. Int. Dairy J. 2019, 99, 104550.
[3]	E. Levy, V. Marcil, S. Tagharist Ép Baumel, et al. Lactoferrin, Osteopontin and Lactoferrin–Osteopontin Complex: A Critical Look on Their Role in Perinatal Period and Cardiometabolic Disorders. Nutrients 2023, 15 (6), 1394.
[4]	P.P. Ward, E. Paz, O.M. Conneely. Lactoferrin: Multifunctional roles of lactoferrin: a critical overview. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005, 62 (22), 2540–2548.
[5]	B. Wang, Y.P. Timilsena, E. Blanch, B. Adhikari. Lactoferrin: Structure, function, denaturation and digestion. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59 (4), 580–596.
[6]	M. Tomita, H. Wakabayashi, K. Shin, et al. Twenty-five years of research on bovine lactoferrin applications. Biochimie 2009, 91 (1), 52–57.
[7]	B. Liu, X. Zhou. Freeze-drying of Proteins. In Cryopreservation and Freeze-drying Protocols; Wolkers, W. F., Oldenhof, H., Eds.; Methods in Molecular Biology; Springer New York, New York, NY, 2015; Vol. 1257, pp 459–476.
[8]	V. Prosapio, E. Lopez-Quiroga. Freeze-drying Technology in Foods. Foods 2020, 9 (7), 920.
[9]	M. Tomita, H. Wakabayashi, K. Yamauchi, S. Teraguchi, H. Hayasawa. Bovine lactoferrin and lactoferricin derived from milk: production and applications. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2002, 80 (1), 109–112.
[10]	B. Wang, Y.P. Timilsena, E. Blanch, B. Adhikari. Characteristics of bovine lactoferrin powders produced through spray and freeze drying processes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 95, 985–994.
[11]	P. Jayaprakash, A. Maudhuit, C. Gaiani, S. Desobry. Encapsulation of bioactive compounds using competitive emerging techniques: Electrospraying, nano spray drying, and electrostatic spray drying. J. Food Eng. 2023, 339, 111260.
[12]	B. Demircan, Y.S. Velioglu, A.M. Giuffrè. Comparison of different drying methods for bergamot peel: Chemical and physicochemical properties. J. Food Sci. 2024, 89 (3), 1498–1516.
[13]	Q. Ma, R.K. Santhanam, Z. Xue, et al. Effect of different drying methods on the physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities of mulberry leaves polysaccharides. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 119, 1137–1143.
[14]	C. Conesa, L. Sánchez, C. Rota, et al. Isolation of lactoferrin from milk of different species: Calorimetric and antimicrobial studies. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2008, 150 (1), 131–139.
[15]	S.J. Gaspard, A.V. Sunds, L.B. Larsen, et al. Influence of desialylation of caseinomacropeptide on the denaturation and aggregation of whey proteins. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103 (6), 4975–4990.
[16]	S.C.T. Nicklisch, J.H. Waite. Optimized DPPH assay in a detergent-based buffer system for measuring antioxidant activity of proteins. MethodsX 2014, 1, 233–238.
[17]	H. Bokkhim, N. Bansal, L. GrØndahl, B. Bhandari. Physico-chemical properties of different forms of bovine lactoferrin. Food Chem. 2013, 141 (3), 3007–3013.
[18]	D.A. Goulding, J. O’Regan, L. Bovetto, N.M. O’Brien, J.A. O’Mahony. Influence of thermal processing on the physicochemical properties of bovine lactoferrin. Int. Dairy J. 2021, 119, 105001.
[19]	C. Conesa, L. Sánchez, M.-D. Pérez, M. Calvo. A Calorimetric Study of Thermal Denaturation of Recombinant Human Lactoferrin from Rice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55 (12), 4848–4853.
[20]	A. Sreedhara, R. Flengsrud, T. Langsrud, et al. Structural characteristic, pH and thermal stabilities of apo and holo forms of caprine and bovine lactoferrins. BioMetals 2010, 23 (6), 1159–1170.
[21]	J. Kong, S. Yu. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopic Analysis of Protein Secondary Structures. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2007, 39 (8), 549–559.
[22]	Y.P. Timilsena, R. Adhikari, C.J. Barrow, B. Adhikari. Physicochemical and functional properties of protein isolate produced from Australian chia seeds. Food Chem. 2016, 212, 648–656.
[23]	Š. Gruden, N.P. Ulrih. Diverse Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Activities of Lactoferrins, Lactoferricins, and Other Lactoferrin-Derived Peptides.
[24]	P.M. Hwang, N. Zhou, X. Shan, C.H. Arrowsmith, H.J. Vogel. Three-Dimensional Solution Structure of Lactoferricin B, an Antimicrobial Peptide Derived from Bovine Lactoferrin. Biochemistry 1998, 37 (12), 4288–4298.
[25]	B.J. Appelmelk, Y.Q. An, M. Geerts, et al. Lactoferrin is a lipid A-binding protein. Infect. Immun. 1994, 62 (6), 2628–2632.
[26]	S. Farnaud, R.W. Evans. Lactoferrin—a multifunctional protein with antimicrobial properties. Mol. Immunol. 2003, 40 (7), 395–405.
[27]	E. Elass-Rochard, A. Roseanu, D. Legrand, et al. Lactoferrin-lipopolysaccharide interaction: involvement of the 28-34 loop region of human lactoferrin in the high-affinity binding to Escherichia coli 055B5 lipopolysaccharide. Biochem. J. 1995, 312 (Pt 3), 839–845.
[28]	A. Bernhardt, M. Wehrl, B. Paul, et al. Improved Sterilization of Sensitive Biomaterials with Supercritical Carbon Dioxide at Low Temperature. PLOS ONE 2015, 10 (6), e0129205.