Journal of Food and Nutrition Research
ISSN (Print): 2333-1119 ISSN (Online): 2333-1240 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/jfnr Editor-in-chief: Prabhat Kumar Mandal
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Journal of Food and Nutrition Research. 2022, 10(4), 293-298
DOI: 10.12691/jfnr-10-4-5
Open AccessArticle

Effect of Acetylated Wheat Starch on Metabolic Indices in High-Fat Diet-induced Obese and Hyperglycemic Mice

Thi Thu Hien Chu1, Hai Thuy Nguyen2, Thi Hoa Phu2, Huu Dung Tran2 and Manh Hung Tran3,

1Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Buon Ma Thuot University, Buon Ma Thuot, Vietnam

2Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam

3Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, 41 Dinh Tien Hoang Street, Ben Nghe ward, district 1, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam

Pub. Date: April 10, 2022

Cite this paper:
Thi Thu Hien Chu, Hai Thuy Nguyen, Thi Hoa Phu, Huu Dung Tran and Manh Hung Tran. Effect of Acetylated Wheat Starch on Metabolic Indices in High-Fat Diet-induced Obese and Hyperglycemic Mice. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research. 2022; 10(4):293-298. doi: 10.12691/jfnr-10-4-5

Abstract

Resistant starches are commercially available as food ingredients for diabetic and obese patients; however, the effects of acetylated wheat starch on digestive enzymes and the glucose-insulin response both in vitro and in vivo require additional evidence. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of acetylated wheat starch (AWS) on blood glucose and insulin responses in high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese and hyperglycemic mice. In vitro determination of α-amylase and amyloglucosidase resistance was performed according to AOAC 2002.02. Obese and hyperglycemic conditions were induced by HFD containing 52.1% fat. Postprandial blood glucose level, intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT), intraperitoneal insulin tolerance test (IPITT), homeostatic model assessment, and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were performed to evaluate the effects of AWS on glucose-insulin response after a single dose or repeated dose of AWS treatment and compared with normal wheat starch (NWS). The results showed that AWS contained a higher ratio of resistant starch (32.11 ± 0.99%) in comparison to NWS (7.36 ± 0.65%) (p < 0.05). The HFD induced significant metabolic alterations, including obesity and-, increased blood glucose (≥ 8.3 mmol/L), triglyceride (≥ 30% vs. control), and insulin levels. In the single-dose treatment protocol in obese, hyperglycemic mice, both postprandial blood glucose and its area under curve (AUC)0-120min values were significantly lower in the AWS-fed group than in the control (NWS-fed) group (p < 0.05). Long-term (8-week) treatment with AWS in obese, hyperglycemic mice significantly lowered body weight, blood glucose levels, and AUC values compared with those of the NWS group (p < 0.05). There was a significant decrease in the HOMA-IR index and AUC value during IPGTT and IPITT in the AWS-treated groups. This study demonstrated that AWS exerted more beneficial effects than NWS in obese and hyperglycemic mice, including weight loss, improved glucose-, and insulin tolerance, and reduced insulin resistance.

Keywords:
acetylated wheat starch obesity diabetes glucose insulin mice

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Arathuzik, G.G. and Goebel-Fabbri, A.E, “Nutrition therapy and the management of obesity and diabetes: an update”, Current Diabetes Reports, 11(2). 106-110. Apr 2011.
 
[2]  Blüher, M, “Obesity: global epidemiology and pathogenesis”, Nature Review Endocrinology, 15(5). 288-298. May 2019.
 
[3]  Englyst, K. N., Liu, S. and Englyst, H.N, “Nutritional characterization and measurement of dietary carbohydrates”, European journal of clinical nutrition, 61(Suppl 1). S19-39. Dec 2007.
 
[4]  Raigond, P., Dutt, S. and Singh, B, Resistant Starch in Food, Springer, Switzerland, 2019, 815-846.
 
[5]  Nawaz, H., Waheed, R., Nawaz, M. and Shahwar, D, Physical and Chemical Modifications in Starch Structure and Reactivity, IntechOpen, London, 2020.
 
[6]  Wanikar, R. and Kotwal, S, Resistant Starch: A Promising Functional Food Ingredient, IntechOpen, London, 2021.
 
[7]  Magallanes-Cruz, P.A., Flores-Silva, P.C. and Bello-Perez L.A, “Starch structure influences its digestibility: A review”, Journal of Food Science, 82(9). 2016-2023. Jul 2017.
 
[8]  Björck, I.M., Gunnarsson, A. and Östergård, K, “A study of native and chemically modified potato starch. Part II: Digestibility in the rat intestinal tract”, Starch-starke, 41. 128-134. 1989.
 
[9]  Chung, H.J., Shin, D.H. and Lim, S.T, “In vitro starch digestibility and estimated glycemic index of chemically modified corn starches”, Food Research International, 41(6). 579-585. Jul 2008.
 
[10]  Takahashi, S., Maningat, C.C. and Seib, P.A, “Acetylated and hydroxypropylated wheat starch: Paste and gel properties compared with modified maize and tapioca starches”, Cereal Chemistry, 66(6). 499-506. 1989.
 
[11]  Pham, V.H. and Morita, N, “Effects of granule sizes on physicochemical properties of cross-linked and acetylated wheat starches”, Starch-starke, 57(9). 413-420. Sep 2005.
 
[12]  Gunaratne, A. and Corke, H, “Influence of prior acid treatment on acetylation of wheat, potato and maize starches”, Food Chemistry, 105(3). 917-925. Dec 2007.
 
[13]  Ačkar, D., Subarić, D., Babić, J., Miličević, B. and Jozinović, A, “Modification of wheat starch with succinic acid/acetanhydride and azelaic acid/acetanhydride mixtures. II. Chemical and physical properties”, Journal of food science and technology, 51(8). 1463-1472. Aug 2014.
 
[14]  McCleary, B.V. and Monaghan, D.A, “Measurement of Resistant Starch”, Journal of AOAC International, 85(3). 665-675. May 2002.
 
[15]  Karasawa, H., Nagata-Goto, S., Takaishi, K. and Kumagae, Y, “A novel model of type 2 diabetes mellitus based on obesity induced by high-fat diet in BDF1 mice”, Metabolism, 58(3). 296-303. Mar 2009.
 
[16]  Hariri, N. and Thibault, L, “High-fat diet-induced obesity in animal models”, Nutrition Research Review, 23(2). 270-299. Oct 2010.
 
[17]  Allison, D.B., Paultre, F., Maggio, C., Mezzitis, N. and Pi-Sunyer, F.X, “The use of areas under curves in diabetes research”, Diabetes Care, 18(2). 245-250. Feb 1995.
 
[18]  Antunes, L.C., Elkfury, J.L., Jornada, M.N., Foletto, K.C. and Bertoluci, M.C, “Validation of HOMA-IR in a model of insulin-resistance induced by a high-fat diet in Wistar rats”, Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 60(2). 138-142. Apr 2016.
 
[19]  Sahnoun, M., Ismail, N. and Kammoun R, “Enzymatically hydrolysed, acetylated and dually modified corn starch: physico-chemical, rheological and nutritional properties and effects on cake quality”, Journal of Food Science and Technology, 53(1). 481-490. Jan 2016.
 
[20]  Code of Federal Regulations. Food additives permitted in food for human consumption. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA, Title 21, Chapter 1. Part 172: Section 172.892, Food Starch, 1994.
 
[21]  Iacovou, M., Lim, J., Maningat, C.C., Bogatyrev, A., Ly, E., Dhital, S., Gidley, M.J., Shi, Y.C., Muir, J. and Seib, P.A, “ In vivo digestibility of cross-linked phosphorylated (RS4) wheat starch in ileostomy subjects”, Bioactive Carbohydrates and Dietary Fibre, 12. 25-36. Oct 2017.
 
[22]  He, J., Liu, J. and Zhang, G, “Slowly digestible waxy maize starch prepared by octenyl succinic anhydride esterification and heat-moisture treatment: glycemic response and mechanism”, Biomacromolecules, 9(1). 175-184. Jan 2008.
 
[23]  Ranaweera, S.A., Bamunuarachchi, K.K.D.S. and Gunaratne, A, “Effect of hydroxypropylation on functional properties of different cultivars of sweet potato starch in Sri Lanka”, International Journal of Food Science”, 2014. 1-8. 2014.
 
[24]  Yang, Q., Graham, T.E., Mody, N., Preiner, F., Peroni O.D., Zabolotny, J.M., Kotani, K., Quadro, L. and Kahn, B.B, “Serum retinol-binding protein 4 contributes to insulin resistance in obesity and type 2 diabetes”, Nature 436. 356-362. Jul 2005.
 
[25]  Shimotoyodome, A., Suzuki, J., Fukuoka, D., Tokimitsu, I. and Hase T, “RS4-type resistant starch prevents high-fat diet-induced obesity via increased hepatic fatty acid oxidation and decreased postprandial GIP in C57BL/6J mice”, American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism, 298(3). E652-E662. Dec 2009.
 
[26]  Si, X., Zhou, Z., Strappe, P. and Blanchard, C, “A comparison of RS4-type resistant starch to RS2-type resistant starch in suppressing oxidative stress in high-fat-diet-induced obese rats”, Food Function, 8(1). 232-240. Jan 2017.
 
[27]  Lee, K.Y., Yoo, S.H. and Lee, H.G, “The effect of chemically-modified resistant starch, RS type-4, on body weight and blood lipid profiles of high fat diet-induced obese mice”, Starch/Starke, 64(1). 78-85. Jan 2012.
 
[28]  Lim, S. M., Choo, J. M., Li, H., O'Rielly, R., Carragher, J., Rogers, G. B., Searle, I., Robertson, S. A., Page, A. J. and Muhlhausler, B, “A High Amylose Wheat Diet Improves Gastrointestinal Health Parameters and Gut Microbiota in Male and Female Mice”, Foods, 10(2). 220. Jan 2021.
 
[29]  Mandaliya, D.K. and Seshadri, S, “Short Chain Fatty Acids, pancreatic dysfunction, and type 2 diabetes”, Pancreatology, 19(2). 280-284. Jan 2019.