The Loss of the Modern Project of Future, Humanity and Individuality: The Philosophy of Education in the Plan of Immanence

Cestari Luiz Artur dos Santos¹ and Gouveia Gleidson^2,

¹Department of Philosophy and Human Sciences, University of Southwestern Bahia (UESB), Vitória da Conquista-BA, Brazil

²University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA

Cite this paper:
Cestari Luiz Artur dos Santos and Gouveia Gleidson. The Loss of the Modern Project of Future, Humanity and Individuality: The Philosophy of Education in the Plan of Immanence. American Journal of Educational Research. 2017; 5(7):747-751. doi: 10.12691/education-5-7-8

Abstract

This text aims to discuss a purpose to present a philosophy of education based on the arguments from Deleuze and Gutarri’s thinking, specifically about the concept of plan of immanence. Two tasks are playing at this context. First, the evaluation of modernity will put in debate three important notions from it: the modern project of future, the humanity and individuality. Then, it will point out the end of the modern promises as emancipatory discourses to be achieved in the future and consolidated during the history, as well as the process that have transformed at same time the human beings in subject and the individuality in individualism. At the second task, it will talk about the terms by which we can present a proposal to philosophize in immanence of life, thinking about how education can working as line of escape of the ephemeral capitalist socialization and discussing two concepts of Deleuze and Guatarri’s thinking: affections and perceptions.

Keywords:
humanity individuality plan of immanence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Michel Foucault. The subject and the power. The critical inquiry, n. 8 (summer 1982) pp. 777-795.
[2]	Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. The Philosophy of History. With Prefaces by Charles Hegel and the Translator, J. Sibree, M.A. Batoche Books Kitchener, Ontario Canada, 2001. http://www.efm.bris.ac.uk/het/hegel/history.pdf.Accessed 04/07/2017.
[3]	Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. The Philosophy of History. With Prefaces by Charles Hegel and the Translator, J. Sibree, M.A. Batoche Books Kitchener, Ontario Canada, 2001, p. 29.
[4]	Immanuel Kant. An answer to the question: What is Enligthenment? Transleted by James Schmidt. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996, p. 58.
[5]	Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno. Dialectic of enlightenment: philosophical fragments. Edited by Gunzelin Schmid Noerr; translated by Edmund Jephcott. Standford University press, 2002.
[6]	Theodor W. Adorno. Theory of Pseudo-Culture (1959). Telos – The critical theory of the contemporary - March 20, 1993 vol. 1993 no. 95 15-38.
[7]	Michel Foucault. The subject and the power. The critical inquiry, n. 8 (summer 1982) pp. 777-795.
[8]	Michel Foucault. The subject and the power. The critical inquiry, n. 8 (summer 1982) p.780.
[9]	Gilles Deleuze Postscript on the Societies of Control October, Vol. 59. (Winter, 1992), pp. 3-7.
[10]	Gilles Lipovetsky. The empire of fashion: dressing modern democracy. Transleted by Catarine Porter forworded by Richard Sennet. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1994, pp. 276.
[11]	Jean-François Lyotard. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Tanslation from the French by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi Foreword by Fredric Jameson. Theory and History of Literature, Volume 10 Manchester University Press, 1984.
[12]	Deleuze, G.; Guattari, F. O que é a filosofia? Trad. Bento Prado Jr. e Alberto Alonso Muñoz. Rio de Janeiro: Editora 34, 1992.
[13]	Gallo, S.. Deleuze & a Educação. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2003, p. 30.
[14]	Cestari, L.A.S. (2016). Educate and Philosophize at Yearbooks of EPENN’S Working Group 17 (WG17). American Journal of Educational Research, 4(15), 1072-1077.
[15]	Gallo, S.. Deleuze & a Educação. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2003, p. 30.
[16]	Deleuze, G. Vocabulaire de Deleuze. (réalisé par Raphaël Bessis), 2003. Avaialble: http://vadeker.net/humanite/philosophie/vocabulaire_deleuze.pdf Accessed 04/07/2017.