Unveiling the Untold Stories of Acquiring a PhD Using Structural Equation Modelling: Ghanaian Perspective

Mary Ann Yeboah¹, Kwame Annin¹, Francis Yaw Anyan^1, , Ama Pokuah Obeng², Rosemary Abayase³ and Elizabeth Serwaa Koomson⁴

¹Department of Statistical Sciences, Kumasi Technical University, Box 854, Kumasi, Ghana

²Department of Computer Science, Kumasi Technical University, Box 854, Kumasi, Ghana

³Department of Hotel, Catering and Institutional Management, Kumasi Technical University, Box 854, Ksi., Ghana

⁴Department of Procurement and Supply Chain Management, Kumasi Technical University, Box 854, Kumasi, Ghana

Cite this paper:
Mary Ann Yeboah, Kwame Annin, Francis Yaw Anyan, Ama Pokuah Obeng, Rosemary Abayase and Elizabeth Serwaa Koomson. Unveiling the Untold Stories of Acquiring a PhD Using Structural Equation Modelling: Ghanaian Perspective. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. 2025; 13(1):14-23. doi: 10.12691/ajams-13-1-2

Abstract

Abstract The study examines the relationship between challenging factors and remedial factors effect on attainment of PhD by Ghanaian using structural equation modelling (SEM). The results showed that the majority of the PhD holders acquired a PhD to enhance their careers, specifically to fulfil job requirements. It was also observed that lack of commitment from supervisors, personal problems, and financial limitations were found to be major barriers to attainment of a PhD. These difficulties impair PhD students’ mental and physical health, which invariably impedes their academic progress. It was also discovered that although remedial factors such as a positive outlook, effective communication, and supervisory assistance are vital in reducing these difficulties, the quality of the academic and research environment has a major impact on students’ PhD achievement. This suggests that a resource-rich and encouraging environment is necessary for PhD programs to be completed on time. These findings are significant for PhD applicants and students as they embark on a PhD academic journey.

Keywords:
PhD doctorate challenges mental health academia SEM

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

References:

[1]	Leonard, D. (2001). A woman's guide to doctoral studies. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
[2]	Gopaul, B. (2011). Distinction in doctoral education: Using Bourdieu’s tools to assess the socialization of doctoral students. Equity & Excellence in Education, 44(1), 10-21.
[3]	Urquhart, A., & Zhang, H. (2021). PhD CEOs and firm performance. European Financial Management, 28(2), 433–481.
[4]	Thompson, G. & Anderson, C. (2022). The pursuit of doctoral degrees: Personal fulfillment and intellectual challenge. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 13 (4), 320-336.
[5]	Hancock, C. N., & Roush, J. R. (2023). Doctoral degrees as gateways to academic careers: Motivations and aspirations. Higher Education Quarterly, 77(1). 58-74.
[6]	Mensah, P. K. (2019). Exploring the impact of doctoral education on local knowledge and development: A Ghanaian perspective. Ghana Social Science Journal, 16(1), 45-62.
[7]	Owusu-Ansah, J. & Gyamfi, A. (2020). PhD research in Ghana: Contributions to policy and societal development. African Educational Research Journal, 8(2), 123-135.
[8]	Keeley, B., & House, A. (2013). The role of higher education in promoting social mobility: A comparative analysis. Higher Education Policy, 26(2), 201-220.
[9]	Baker, V. L., & Lattuca, L. R. (2010). Developmental networks and learning: Toward an interdisciplinary perspective on identity development during doctoral study. Studies in Higher Education, 35 (7), 807-827.
[10]	Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At Cross Purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. The Pew Charitable Trusts.
[11]	Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(8), 3157-3162.
[12]	Cech, E. A., & Blair-Loy, M. (2019). The Changing Career Trajectories of New Parents in STEM. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(10), 4182-4187.
[13]	Elsevier. (2020). The researcher journey through a gender lens: An examination of research participation, career progression and perceptions across the globe. Elsevier. https:// www.elsevier.com/ research-intelligence/resource-library/gender-report-2020.
[14]	Ampofo A. A., & Boateng, J. (2019). Gender and academic leadership in Ghana: A critical reflection. Africa Sociology Review, 23(1), 50-69.
[15]	Atkinson, C., Briner, R. B., & Litchfield, P. (2022). The impact of doctoral study on mental health and wellbeing: A systematic review, Higher Education Research & Development, 41(4), 757-773.
[16]	Bluntz, C. (2020). The emerging focus on mental health in doctoral education: A critical review. Journal of Graduate Education, 42(2), 123-140.
[17]	Barry, K. M., Woods, M., Warnecke, E., Stirling, C., & Martin, A. (2018). Psychological health of doctoral candidates, study-related challenges and perceived performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(3), 468-483.
[18]	Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice-Hall.
[19]	Cole, D. A., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Manifest variable path analysis: Potentially serious and misleading consequences due to uncorrected, measurement error. Psychological Methods, 19(2), 300-315.
[20]	National Science Foundation. (2023). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2023. National Centre for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). https://ncses,nsf,gov/pubs/nfs23300/.
[21]	UNESCO. (2020). Global Education Monitoring Report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. UNESCO Publishing.
[22]	Gardner, S. K. (2009). Student and faculty attributions of attrition in high and low-completing doctoral programs in the United States. Higher Education, 58(1), 97-112.
[23]	Kasworm, C. E. (2010). Adult learners in a research university: Negotiating undergraduate student identity. Adult Education Quarterly, 60(2), 143-160.
[24]	Austin, A. E., & McDaniels, M. (2006). Preparing the professoriate of the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 21, 397-456.
[25]	Pyhältö, K., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2009). Developing scholarly communities as learning environments for doctoral students. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(3), 221-232.
[26]	Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267-281.
[27]	Halse, C., & Malfroy, J. (2010). Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 79-92.
[28]	Pearson, M., & Brew, A. (2002). Research training and supervision development. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 135-150.
[29]	Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
[30]	Stubb, J., Pyhältö, K., & Lonka, K. (2011). Balancing between inspiration and exhaustion: PhD students’ experienced socio-psychological well-being. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 33-50.
[31]	Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., Van der Heyden, J., & Gisle, L. (2017). Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students. Research Policy, 46(4), 868-879.
[32]	Evans, T. M., Bira, L., Gastelum, J. B., Weiss, L. T., & Vanderford, N. L. (2018). Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education. Nature Biotechnology, 36(3), 282-284.
[33]	Mullins, G., & Kiley, M. (2002). ‘It’s a PhD, not a Nobel Prize’: How experienced examiners assess research theses. Studies in Higher Education, 27(4), 369-386.
[34]	Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Erlbaum.
[35]	Cheung, G.W., Cooper-Thomas, H.D., Lau, R.S., Wang, L.C. (2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 41, 745–783.
[36]	Yu, M., Lin, H., Wang, G. G., Liu, Y., & Zheng, X. (2021). Is too much as bad as too little? The S-curve relationship between corporate philanthropy and employee performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management.