Journals A-Z
All Subjects
Free Journals
sciepub.com
World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
ISSN (Print): 2474-1426 ISSN (Online): 2474-1434 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/wjssh Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Issue 3, Volume 7
Article Metrics
  • 5332
    Views
  • 6421
    Saves
  • 0
    Citations
  • 2
    Likes
Export Article
World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 2021, 7(3), 83-105
DOI: 10.12691/wjssh-7-3-2
Open AccessArticle

Towards Building a Functional Whole-of-Government Monitoring and Evaluation System for Zambia: The Demand Side

Vincent Kanyamuna1,

1School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Development Studies, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

Pub. Date: August 16, 2021
View Full Text Full Text PDF (532 KB) Full Text ePUB(585 KB)

Cite this paper:
Vincent Kanyamuna. Towards Building a Functional Whole-of-Government Monitoring and Evaluation System for Zambia: The Demand Side. World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 2021; 7(3):83-105. doi: 10.12691/wjssh-7-3-2

Abstract

Every monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system is comprised of two sides—the supply side and the demand side. This study focused on the demand side of Zambia’s whole-of-government M&E system (WoGM&ES). It investigated the gaps that characterised the public sector system for M&E and proposed a new model for improving the demand side. Primary and secondary sources were used to collect data for the study. Questionnaires and interview guides are the instruments employed to collect information. Essentially, Zambia’s WoGM&ES was found to be very weak on the demand side. The system lacked a unified arrangement for demanding and utilising M&E information. Government and non-government structures and institutions such as the presidency, parliament, line ministries, civil society, the academia and cooperating partners remained fragmented and uncoordinated in the manner they demanded for M&E information to feed into their internal development processes. The general public too had no clear means of engaging the public sector on development issues that affected them. In many cases, M&E reports were not in the reach of the public, making it difficult to engage. More so, political championship at the level of the Presidency and Cabinet ministers as well as at several technical levels across the public sector lacked in Zambia. To address the gaps, this paper is a proposed blueprint for consideration by the Government of Zambia. The model proposes that Government implements the following to build and sustain the demand side: transform the Presidency and top government positions (political and technical) into M&E champions; promote the use of M&E information by the Presidency; link M&E to planning, budgeting and policy processes; promote the use of M&E information by parliament, civil society, academia, media and donors. Decentralised structures of government as well as the general public will also need to be stimulated on the acquisition and use of M&E information. Equally, Government would need to incentivise the strategic users of M&E information across the country. Another similar study has been conducted on the supply side of Zambia’s WoGM&ES. Evidence on both sides will be useful for building and sustaining Zambia’s WoGM&ES going forward!

Keywords:
whole-of-government monitoring and evaluation system monitoring evaluation monitoring and evaluation system LEADS diagnostic checklist demand-side supply-side good governance Zambia

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Republic of South Africa. 2007. Policy Framework for the Government-Wide Monitoring and Evaluation System. The Presidency, Pretoria, South Africa.
 
[2]  GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. 2006. Fifth National Development Plan 2006-2010: Broad based wealth and job creation through citizenry participation and technological advancement, Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
 
[3]  Hardlife, Z. & Zhou, G. 2013. Utilisation of monitoring and evaluation systems by development agencies: The case of the UNDP in Zimbabwe. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(3): 70-83.
 
[4]  Bamberger, M. 2008. Enhancing the utilisation of evaluations for evidence-based policy- making. In M. Segone (Ed.). Bridging the Gap. Switzerland: UNICEF.
 
[5]  Abraham, I.J. & Torres, M.M. 2004. Mainstreaming Empowerment in the Bolivia PRSP monitoring and evaluation at the Municipal Level. Special series on social accountability in Latin America and the Caribbean. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[6]  Republic of South Africa. 2008. Basic Concepts in Monitoring and Evaluation. Public Service Commission, Pretoria, South Africa.
 
[7]  Edmunds, R. & Marchant, T. 2008. Official Statistics and Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Developing Countries: Friends or Foes?, (October): 1-43.
 
[8]  Adrien, M.H. 2003. Evaluation Capacity Development: Guide to Conducting Reviews of Organisations Supplying M&E Training, ECD Working Paper Series No. 9, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[9]  Kanyamuna, V., Phiri, M., Kanenga, H. & Mulonda, M. (2020). “Role of Actors Outside Government in Strengthening the Country Monitoring and Evaluation System in Zambia.” World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, vol. 6, no. 1: 22-29.
 
[10]  Ahmad, R. 2008. Governance, Social Accountability and the Civil Society. JOAAG, Vol.3. No.1.
 
[11]  GRZ. Ministry of National Development Planning. 2014 Annual Progress Report for the Revised Sixth National Development Plan 2013-2016: People Centred Economic Growth and Development. Lusaka: Ministry of National Development Planning.
 
[12]  Ostrom, E., Gibson, C., Shivakumar, S. & Andersson, K. 2002. Aid, Incentives, and Sustainability: An Institutional Analysis of Development Cooperation, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University, Sida Studies in Evaluation 02/01.
 
[13]  Akhtar, T., Ebrahimian, E., Prasad, B., and Tavera, C. (Eds.). 2005. Partners for Change. Experiences from UNDP’s work with civil society organizations through the Global Environment Facility.
 
[14]  Alzate, R. D. E. 2000. Monitoring and evaluating local development through community participation: The experience of the Association of Indigenous Cabildos of Northern Cauca, Columbia. In M. Estella, J. Blauert, D. Campilian, J. Gaventa, J. Gonsalves, I. Guijt, D. Johnson, & R. Riacafort (Eds.), Learning from change: Issues and experiences in participatory monitoring and evaluation (pp. 95-108). Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
 
[15]  GRZ. Ministry of National Development Planning. 2016. 2015 Annual Progress Report for the Revised Sixth National Development Plan 2013-2016: People Centred Economic Growth and Development. Lusaka: Ministry of National Development Planning.
 
[16]  Arora, D. 2013. Good Governance: A Study of the Concept in Indian Context–Origin of the Concept of Good Governance, Good Governance, 37(1): 1-16.
 
[17]  Booth, D. 2005. Missing links in the politics of development: Learning from the PRSP experiment, ODI Working Paper No. 256. Overseas Development Institute, London.
 
[18]  Brousselle, A. & Champagne, F. 2011. Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(1): 69-78.
 
[19]  Castro, M. F. 2009. Insider Insights: Building a Results-Based Management and Evaluation System in Colombia. ECD Working Paper 18, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[20]  Castro, M.F., Lopez-Acevado, G.,Busjeet, G.B. & Ardonez, X.F. 2009. Mexico's M&E System: Scaling up from the sectoral to the National Level. Evaluation Capacity Development. IEG. The Word Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[21]  Chabane, C. 2013. The Role of Monitoring and Evaluation in the Public Service, Republic of South Africa—The Presidency Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation. Pretoria, South Africa.
 
[22]  Chambers, R. 1994. Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Challenges, potentials, and paradigm. World Development, 22(1): 1437–1454.
 
[23]  Eberlei, W. & Henn, H. 2003. Parliaments in Sub-Sahara Africa: Actors in poverty reduction? Eshborn: Deutsche Geschellschaft fu¨r Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ).
 
[24]  El Baradei, L. Abdelhamid, D. & Walley, N. 2014. Institutionalising and streamlining development monitoring and evaluation in post-revolutionary Egypt: A readiness Primer. African Evaluation Journal, 2(1): 1-16.
 
[25]  Engela, R. & Ajam, T. 2010. Evaluation Capacity Development: Implementing a Government-Wide Monitoring and Evaluation System in South Africa, Working Paper Series No. 21 No. 21. OED, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[26]  Gomez, R., Olivera, M. & Velasco, M. 2009. Implementing a Subnational Results-oriented Management and Budgeting System: Lessons from Medellin, Colombia. Evaluation Capacity Development. IEG. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[27]  Görgens, M. & Kusek, J. 2009. Making Monitoring and Evaluation Systems Work: A Capacity Development Toolkit. IBRD World Bank, Washington DC.
 
[28]  GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. 2002. Zambia poverty reduction strategy paper (2002-2004), March 2002. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
 
[29]  GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. 2009. Mid-Term Review of the Fifth National Development Plan 2006-2010: Broad based wealth and job creation through citizenry participation and technological advancement. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
 
[30]  Adato, M. 2011. Combining Quantitative and Qualitative methods for Program Monitoring and Evaluation: Why are mixed method designs best? Prem Notes. Special series on the Nuts and Bolts of M&E systems. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[31]  GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. 2014. National Planning and Budgeting Policy: Responsive, transparent, accountable and results-oriented Development Planning and Budgeting processes. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
 
[32]  GRZ. Ministry of National Development Planning. National Monitoring and Evaluation Policy (2019-2023): Results-oriented, evidence-based, integrated and well-coordinated Government-wide Monitoring and Evaluation System for improved development results. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning, 2019.
 
[33]  Kusek, J.Z., Rist, R.C. & White, E.M. 2004. How will we know Millennium Development Results when we see them? Building a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System to Give us the Answer. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[34]  GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning (MOF–Zambia). 2013. Report on the Performance of the Sector Advisory Groups (SAGs), Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
 
[35]  Ahem, M., Beard, V.A., Gueorguieva, A.I. & Sri Handini, R. 2012. Using M&E to support Performance Based Planning and Budgeting in Indonesia. Prem Notes, Special series on the Nuts and Bolts of M&E systems. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[36]  Hickey, S. & Mohan, G. 2008. The Politics of Establishing Pro Poor Accountability: What can Poverty Reduction Strategies Achieve? Review of International Political Economy, 15(2): 234-258.
 
[37]  Holvoet, N., Gildemyn, M. & Inberg, L. 2012. Taking Stock of Monitoring and Evaluation Arrangements in the Context of Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers: Evidence from 20 Aid-Dependent Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Development Policy Review, 30(6): 749-772.
 
[38]  Holvoet, N., Inberg, L. & Sekirime, S. 2013. Institutional analysis of monitoring and evaluation systems: Comparing M&E systems in Uganda's health and education sectors. Working Paprer, Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of Antwerp.
 
[39]  Zambia Monitoring and Evaluation Association. National Evaluation Advocacy and Strategy–2018-2021. Lusaka, 2018.
 
[40]  Holvoet, N. & Renard, R. 2005. Putting the New Aid Paradigm to Work, Challenges for Monitoring and Evaluation, Discussion Paper No. 2. Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of Antwerp, Antwerp.
 
[41]  Holvoet, N. & Rombouts, H. 2008. The challenge of monitoring and evaluation under the new aid modalities: Experiences from Rwanda. Journal of Modern African Studies, 46(4): 577-602.
 
[42]  Holvoet, N. & Rombouts, H. 2008. The Denial of Politics in PRSP’s Monitoring and Evaluation: Experiences from Rwanda, Discussion Paper. Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of Antwerp, Antwerp.
 
[43]  GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. 2010. Sixth National Development Plan 2011-2015: Sustained Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
 
[44]  Hwang, H. 2014. Building Monitoring and Evaluation Capacity in young systems: The experiences of Rwanda, Vietnam and Yemen. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[45]  Kanyamuna, V. 2013. Sector Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in the context of Poverty Reduction Strategies: A comparative case study of Zambia’s Health and Agriculture sectors. MSc-dissertation, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
 
[46]  Kanyamuna, V., Mubita, A., Ng’andu, E., Mizinga, C. & Mwale, A. 2018. An Assessment of the Demand-Side of the Monitoring and Evaluation System of the Health Sector in Zambia. World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(2): 75-86.
 
[47]  Mubita, A., Mulonda, M., Libati, M., Mwale, N. & Kanyamuna, V. Urban Informality and Small Scale Enterprise (SME) Development in Zambia: An Exploration of Theory and Practice, Journal of Behavioural Economics, Finance, Entrepreneurship, Accounting and Transport, 2017. 5(1): p.19-29.
 
[48]  Kanyamuna, V., Mulonda, M. & Mulele, C.S. 2019. Monitoring and Evaluation Legislation in Zambia–Gap Analysis. International Journal of Humanities, Art and Social Studies, 4(1): 15-25.
 
[49]  GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. 2011. Fifth National Development Plan 2010 Annual Progress Review: Broad Based Wealth and Job Creation through Citizenry Participation and Technological Advancement. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
 
[50]  Kusek, J. Z. & Rist, R. C. 2004. Ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation Systems. A Handbook for Development Practitioners. The World Bank. Washington D.C.
 
[51]  Laguna, M. 2011. Chile's Monitoring and Evaluation System (1994-2010). Prem Notes, Special series on the Nuts and Bolts of M&E systems. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[52]  Lopez-Acevedo, G., Rivera, K., Rivera, L. 2010. Challenges in Monitoring and Evaluation: An Opportunity To Institutionalize M&E Systems. Fifth Conference of the Latin America and the Caribbean Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Network.
 
[53]  Mupeta, S., Muleya, G., Kanyamuna, V., & Simui, F. (2020). Imperial Districts Civic Entrepreneurship: The Implementation of Civic Innovations in the Governance of the University of Zambia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(7) 674-685.
 
[54]  Lopez-Acevedo, G., Krause, P. & Mackay, K. (Eds.). 2012. Building Better Policies. Washington, D.C. The World Bank.
 
[55]  Mackay, K. 1999. Evaluation Capacity Development: A Diagnostic Guide and Action Framework, ECD Working Paper Series No. 6. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[56]  Mackay, K. 2007. How to Build M&E Systems to Support Better Government. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and World Bank. The World Bank, Washington D.C.
 
[57]  Bamberger, M. 2006. Evaluation Capacity Building, In: Segone and Ocampo (Ed.), Creating and Developing Evaluation Organizations) – Lessons learned from Africa, Americas, Asia, Australasia and Europe.
 
[58]  GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. 2014. Report of the Final Evaluation of the Fifth National Development Plan 2006-2010. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
 
[59]  Bedi, T., Coudouel, A., Cox, M., Goldstein, M. & Thornton, N. 2006. Beyond the numbers : Understanding the institutions for monitoring poverty reduction strategies. The World Bank. Washington, D.C.
 
[60]  Mackay, K. 2010. Conceptual Framework for Monitoring and Evaluation. The Nuts & Bolts of M&E Systems—The World Bank, 1, 8.
 
[61]  Mackay, K. 2011. The Australian Government’s Performance Framework, ECD Working Paper No. 25. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[62]  Mackay, K. 2006. Institutionalizing of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems to Improve Public Sector Management, ECD Working Paper Series No. 15. IEG World Bank, Washington D.C.
 
[63]  GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. 2014. Revised Sixth National Development Plan 2013-2016: People Centred Economic Growth and Development – Volume I. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
 
[64]  Mark, M. M. 2008. Building a better evidence base for evaluation theory: Beyond general calls to a framework of types of research on evaluation. In N. Smith & P. R. Brandon (Eds.), Fundamental issues in evaluation (pp. 111-134). New York: Guilford.
 
[65]  Booth, D. & Lucas, H. 2002. Good Practice in the Development of PRSP Indicators and Monitoring Systems, ODI Working Paper 172. Overseas Development Institute, London.
 
[66]  May, E., Shand, D., Mackay, K., Rojas, F. & Saavedra, J. (Eds.). 2006. Towards the Institutionalization of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Latin America and the Caribbean: Proceedings of a World Bank Conference. The World Bank, Washington D.C.
 
[67]  Holvoet, N. & Renard, R. Putting the New Aid Paradigm to Work, Challenges for Monitoring and Evaluation, Discussion Paper No. 2. Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, 2005.
 
[68]  Mehrotra, S. 2013. The Government Monitoring and Evaluation System in India: A Work in Progress, ECD Working Paper series 28. IEG, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[69]  Kanyamuna, V., Phiri, M., Kanenga, H. & Mulonda, M. (2020). “Role of Actors Outside Government in Strengthening the Country Monitoring and Evaluation System in Zambia.” World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, vol. 6, no. 1: 22-29.
 
[70]  Kusek, J.Z. 2011. Assessing Country Readiness for Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation to support Results Informed Budgeting. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[71]  Kanyamuna, V., Mumba, M.H., Mkandawire, A., Munalula, M. & Kalonje, V. (2021). “Opportunities and Challenges in Using Information from Zambia’s Government Monitoring and Evaluation System”. World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, vol. 7, no. 1: 23-33.
 
[72]  Morra Imas, L. G. & Rist, R. C. 2009. The Road to Results: Designing and Conducting Effective Development Evaluations. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[73]  Mosse, R. & Sontheimer, L. 1996. Performance Monitoring Indicators Handbook. World Bank Technical Paper No. 334. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[74]  Mulonda, M., Kanyamuna, V. & Kanenga, H. 2018. State–Civil Society relationship in Zambia, International Journal of Humanities, Art and Social Studies, 3(4): 17-26.
 
[75]  Bamberger, M. 2008. Enhancing the utilisation of evaluations for evidence-based policy- making. In M. Segone (Ed.). Bridging the Gap. Switzerland: UNICEF.
 
[76]  Naidoo, I. 2011. The role of monitoring and evaluation in promoting good governance in South Africa : A case study of the Department of Social Development: PhD–Thesis submitted to the Graduate School of Public & Development Management in fulfilment of the requirements for doctorate degree. University of Witwatersrand.
 
[77]  Kanyamuna, V., Mulonda, M. & Mulele, C.S. Monitoring and Evaluation Legislation in Zambia–Gap Analysis. International Journal of Humanities, Art and Social Studies, 2019. 4(1): 15-25.
 
[78]  Nelson, C. 2016. Exploring Monitoring and Evaluation within a Good Governance perspective: A case study of Stellenbosch Municipality, March, 2016.
 
[79]  OECD/DAC. 2005. Aid Effectiveness 2005-10 : Progress in Implementing the Paris Declaration. Paris.OECD Publications.
 
[80]  Porter, S. & Goldman, I. 2013. A Growing Demand for Monitoring and Evaluation in Africa. African Evaluation Journal.1(1): 1-9.
 
[81]  Porter, S. 2012. ‘The Growing Demand for Monitoring and Evaluation in Africa’, in Centre for Learning on Evaluation and Results CLEAR (ed.), African Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: Exploratory Case Studies (Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand).
 
[82]  Raimondo, E. 2016. What Difference Does Good Monitoring and Evaluation Make to World Bank Project Performance? Policy Research Working Paper. IEG. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[83]  Kanyamuna, V., Mubita, A., Ng’andu, E., Mizinga, C. & Mwale, A. 2018. An Assessment of the Demand-Side of the Monitoring and Evaluation System of the Health Sector in Zambia. World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2018. 4(2): p. 75-86.
 
[84]  Schiavo-Campo, S. 2005. Evaluation Capacity Development—Building Country Capacity for Monitoring and Evaluation in the Public Sector: Selected Lessons of International Experience, Working Paper Series No. 13, OED, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[85]  Segone, M. (Ed), 2010. From policies to results. Developing capacities for country monitoring and evaluation systems. UNICEF, DevInfo, IDEAS, ILO, IOCE, UNDP, UNIFEM, WFP and World Bank.
 
[86]  Shepherd, G. 2011. Conducting Diagnosis of M&E systems and Capacities. Prem Notes, Special series on the Nuts and Bolts of M&E systems. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[87]  Smith, P. C., Nutley, S. M., Davies, H. T. O., Nutley, S. M. & Smith, P. C. 2009. What works?: evidence-based policy and practice in public services. What works?: evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol: The Policy Press.
 
[88]  Kanyamuna, V. Sector Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in the context of Poverty Reduction Strategies: A comparative case study of Zambia’s Health and Agriculture sectors. MSc–dissertation, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, 2013.
 
[89]  Srivastava, J., Kampen, J., Baker, G., Byerlee, D. & Sehya, M. 2003. Good practices in Monitoring and Evaluation and Management Information Systems for competitive Grant Progams in ECA Countries. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[90]  Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. 2012. Theory-Based Approaches to Evaluation: Concepts and Practices.
 
[91]  Trucano, M. (ed.). 2005. Monitoring and Evaluation of ICT in Education projects: A Handbook for Developing Countries. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[92]  UNAIDS. 2009. 12 Components of Monitoring and Evaluation System Assessment: Guidelines to Support Preparation, Implementation and Follow-up Activities. Geneva.
 
[93]  UNDP. 2009a. Handbook on Planning, Monitoring and Evaluating for Development Results. United Nations Development Programme, New York.
 
[94]  Kanyamuna, V., Kotzé, D. A. & Phiri, M. “Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: The Missing Strand in the African Transformational Development Agenda.” World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2019. 5(3): 160-175.
 
[95]  GRZ. Ministry of National Development Planning. 2017. Seventh National Development Plan (7NDP 2017-2021), Accelerating Development Efforts towards Vision 2030 without Leaving Anyone Behind (Vol. 1). Lusaka: Ministry of National Development Planning.
 
[96]  White, H. 2009. Theory-Based Impact Evaluation: Principles and Practice (Impact Evaluation Working Paper 3). International Initiative for Impact Evaluation, Working Paper 3. New Delhi.
 
[97]  Wong, C. 2012. Toward Building Performance – Oriented Management in China: The critical role of Monitoring and Evaluation and the Long road Ahead (ECD Working Paper No. 27). The World Bank, Washington D.C.
 
[98]  Kanyamuna, V., Katowa, T., Mubita, A., Kanenga, H., Simui, F., & Kotze, D. A. (2020). Analysis of Structural and Organisational Arrangements of Monitoring And Evaluation Status For The Public Sector In Zambia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(6) 504-527.
 
[99]  World Bank. 2004. Assessing country readiness for results-based monitoring and evaluation systems. Prem Notes, Special series on the Nuts and Bolts of M&E systems. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[100]  World Bank. 2007. A Diagnosis of Colombia's National M&E System, SINERGIA. Evaluation Capacity Development. Working Paper Series No. 17. IEG. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[101]  World Bank. 2009. Institutionalising Impact Evaluation within the framework of a Monitoring and Evaluation System. IEG. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[102]  Segone, M. 2008. “Evidence-based policy-making and the role of monitoring and evaluation within the new aid environment”. In: Bridging the gap. The role of monitoring and evaluation in evidence-based policy-making. UNICEF, DevInfo, IDEAS, MICS, The World Bank.
 
[103]  World Bank. 2012. Designing a Results Framework for achieving Results: A How-To-Guide. IEG, Washington, DC.
 
[104]  Mulonda, M., Kanyamuna, V. & Kanenga, H. State–Civil Society relationship in Zambia, International Journal of Humanities, Art and Social Studies, 2018. 3(4): p. 17-26.
 
[105]  World Bank. 2012. Improving the Quality of Public Expenditure through the use of Performance Information in Mexico. IEG, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[106]  World Health Organisation. 2012. Monitoring and Evaluation Indicators for Integrated Vector Management. WHO, Geneva.
 
[107]  Wotela, K. 2017. A proposed Monitoring and Evaluation Curriculum based on a model that institutionalises monitoring and evaluation. African Evaluation Journal, 5(1): 1-8.
 
[108]  Mackay, K. 2008. Helping countries build government monitoring and evaluation system. World Bank contribution to evidence-based policy making. In M. Segone (Ed.). Bridging the Gap. Switzerland: UNICEF.
 
[109]  Lopez-Acevedo, G., Krause, P. & Mackay, K. (Eds.). 2012. Building Better Policies: The Nuts and Bolts of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
 
[110]  Zaltsman, A. 2006. Experience with Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems In Five Latin American Countries: Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Uruguay (ECD Working Paper 16 No. 16). Washington, D.C. The World Bank.
 
[111]  Kanyamuna, V., Mubita, A., & Kotzé, D. A. Is the policy environment for Zambia supportive of a thriving whole-of-government monitoring and evaluation system? Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2020. 7(1) 542-554.
 
[112]  Zambia Monitoring and Evaluation Association. 2018. National Evaluation Advocacy and Strategy–2018-2021. Lusaka.
 
[113]  Kusek, J. Z. & Rist, R. C. 2002. Building Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: Assessing Developing Countries Readiness. Zeitschrift Für Evaluation, 1 (1): 151-158.
 
[114]  Kanyamuna, V. Analysis of Zambia’s Whole-of-Government Monitoring and Evaluation System in the context of National Development Plans. Doctorate Thesis. University of South Africa, 2019.
 
[115]  Segone, M. (Ed.). 2009. Country-led Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: Better evidence, better policies, better development results. UNICEF, Geneva.
 
[116]  GRZ. Ministry of National Development Planning. 2017a. 2016 Annual Progress Report for the Revised Sixth National Development Plan 2013-2016: People Centred Economic Growth and Development. Lusaka: Ministry of National Development Planning.
 
Manuscript template