World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
ISSN (Print): 2474-1426 ISSN (Online): 2474-1434 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/wjssh Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 2021, 7(1), 23-33
DOI: 10.12691/wjssh-7-1-4
Open AccessArticle

Opportunities and Challenges in Using Information from Zambia’s Government Monitoring and Evaluation System

Vincent Kanyamuna1, , Moonga Hangoma Mumba1, Augustine Mkandawire1, Mulonda Munalula1 and Valentine Kalonje1

1School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Development Studies, University of Zambia, Zambia

Pub. Date: January 28, 2021

Cite this paper:
Vincent Kanyamuna, Moonga Hangoma Mumba, Augustine Mkandawire, Mulonda Munalula and Valentine Kalonje. Opportunities and Challenges in Using Information from Zambia’s Government Monitoring and Evaluation System. World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 2021; 7(1):23-33. doi: 10.12691/wjssh-7-1-4

Abstract

To ascertain the opportunities and challenges in using information from Zambia’s whole-of-government monitoring and evaluation system (WoGM&ES) was the main aim of this research study. The study is premised on the conviction that the acquisition and use of information from M&E is what lacks in key development decision- and policy- making development processes. Thus, the Zambian government would do well to strengthen the M&E function and improve its culture of using results across the public sector. The research approach taken was investigatory and descriptive. Two analysis tools were employed for data collection, collation, discussion, drawing of conclusions and recommendations as well as presentation—a diagnostic tool and the LEADS scoring system. While Zambia’s public sector system for M&E was in place, it was found to be weak in many ways. Efforts to improve the system were acknowledged by several stakeholders but clearly, the M&E gaps still left much to be desired if the country’s use of evidence to inform development processes was to match expected local and global standards. Using results from the diagnostic checklist and the LEADS scoring system, useful insights critical to assist the Government of Zambia and other stakeholders have been identified and espoused. Thus, national and decentralised level-government structures, civil society, parliament, academia, donors and other key stakeholders have been identified to be crucial partners towards enhancing the demand and use of information from M&E within and outside government. Collaborations by these stakeholders will lead to a strengthened WoGM&ES for Zambia’s public sector.

Keywords:
M&E Outputs monitoring evaluation whole-of-government monitoring and evaluation system diagnostic checklist LEADS scoring system good governance results-based evidence-based Zambia

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Kusek, J. Z. & Rist, R. C. Ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation Systems. A Handbook for Development Practitioners. The World Bank. Washington D.C., 2004.
 
[2]  Lahey, R. The Canadian Monitoring and Evaluation System. Prem Notes, Special series on the Nuts and Bolts of M&E systems. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., 2011.
 
[3]  Mackay, K. Institutionalizing of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems to Improve Public Sector Management, ECD Working Paper Series No. 15. IEG World Bank, Washington D.C., 2006.
 
[4]  Manning, R. Using indicators to encourage development: lessons from the millennium development goals (IDS Bulletin No.1)., 2009.
 
[5]  Naidoo, I. Monitoring and Evaluation in South Africa. Many purposes, multiple systems. In M. Sergone (Ed.). From Policies to Results: Developing capacities for country monitoring and evaluation systems, 2010. New York: UNICEF: pp. 303-320.
 
[6]  Segone, M. (Ed.). Country-led Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: Better evidence, better policies, better development results. UNICEF, Geneva, 2009.
 
[7]  Kusek, J.Z. Assessing Country Readiness for Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation to support Results Informed Budgeting. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., 2011.
 
[8]  Valadez, J. & Bamberger. M. Organizational and Management Issues in Programme Evaluation. In Monitoring and Evaluating Social Programmes in Developing Countries: A Handbook for Policymakers, Managers and Researchers. J. Valadez & M. Bamberger (Eds.). Washington D.C., 1994. The World Bank: pp. 403-441.
 
[9]  Mackay, K. How to Build M&E Systems to Support Better Government. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and World Bank. The World Bank, Washington D.C., 2007.
 
[10]  Kanyamuna, V., Kotzé, D. A. & Phiri, M. “Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: The Missing Strand in the African Transformational Development Agenda.” World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2019. 5(3): 160-175.
 
[11]  May, E., Shand, D., Mackay, K., Rojas, F. & Saavedra, J. (Eds.). Towards the Institutionalization of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Latin America and the Caribbean: Proceedings of a World Bank Conference. The World Bank, Washington D.C., 2006.
 
[12]  Kanyamuna, V., Katowa, T., Mubita, A., Kanenga, H., Simui, F., & Kotze, D. A. (2020). Analysis of Structural and Organisational Arrangements of Monitoring And Evaluation Status For The Public Sector In Zambia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(6) 504-527.
 
[13]  GRZ. Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock (MAL - Zambia). Agriculture Strategic Plan: 2013-2016, Lusaka: Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, 2013.
 
[14]  Holvoet, N. & Renard, R. Putting the New Aid Paradigm to Work, Challenges for Monitoring and Evaluation, Discussion Paper No. 2. Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, 2005.
 
[15]  World Bank. Participation in Monitoring and evaluation of PRSPs. A document review of trends and approaches emerging from 21 full PRSPs. Washington, D.C., The World Bank, Social Development Department, The participation and civic engagement group. The World Bank, Washington D.C., 2003.
 
[16]  Trucano, M. (ed.). Monitoring and Evaluation of ICT in Education projects: A Handbook for Developing Countries. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., 2005.
 
[17]  World Bank. Assessing country readiness for results-based monitoring and evaluation systems. Prem Notes, Special series on the Nuts and Bolts of M&E systems. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., 2004.
 
[18]  Tania, A., & Ronette, E. Implementing a government wide monitoring and evaluation system in South Africa, 2010.
 
[19]  OECD/DAC Working Party on Aid Evaluation. 2000. Donor Support for Institutional Capacity Development in Environment: Lessons Learned. Paris.
 
[20]  Mupeta, S., Muleya, G., Kanyamuna, V., & Simui, F. (2020). Imperial Districts Civic Entrepreneurship: The Implementation of Civic Innovations in the Governance of the University of Zambia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(7) 674-685.
 
[21]  GRZ. Ministry of National Development Planning. 2015 Annual Progress Report for the Revised Sixth National Development Plan 2013-2016: People Centred Economic Growth and Development. Lusaka: Ministry of National Development Planning, 2016.
 
[22]  Kanyamuna, V. Sector Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in the context of Poverty Reduction Strategies: A comparative case study of Zambia’s Health and Agriculture sectors. MSc-dissertation, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, 2013.
 
[23]  Mackay, K. Evaluation Capacity Development: A Diagnostic Guide and Action Framework, ECD Working Paper Series No. 6. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., 1999.
 
[24]  Mackay, K. (Ed.). 1998. Public Sector Performance - The Critical Role of Evaluation: Selected Proceedings from a World Bank Seminar. The World Bank, Washington D.C.
 
[25]  GRZ. Ministry of National Development Planning. 2013 Annual Progress Report for the Sixth National Development Plan 2011-2015: Sustainable Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction. Lusaka: Ministry of National Development Planning, 2014.
 
[26]  Hlatshwayo, N. & Govender, K. Monitoring and Evaluation in the Public Sector: A Case Study of the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform in South Africa. Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research, 2015. 2(2): 91-99.
 
[27]  GRZ. Ministry of National Development Planning. Seventh National Development Plan (7NDP 2017-2021), Accelerating Development Efforts towards Vision 2030 without Leaving Anyone Behind (Vol. 1). Lusaka: Ministry of National Development Planning, 2017.
 
[28]  GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. National Planning and Budgeting Policy: Responsive, transparent, accountable and results-oriented Development Planning and Budgeting processes. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning, 2014.
 
[29]  GRZ. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives (MAL - Zambia). Agriculture Strategic Plan: 2006-2010, Lusaka: Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, 2006.
 
[30]  Kanyamuna, V., Mubita, A., & Kotzé, D. A. Is the policy environment for Zambia supportive of a thriving whole-of-government monitoring and evaluation system? Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2020. 7(1) 542-554.
 
[31]  Estrella, M. & Gaventa, J. Who Counts Reality? Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation: A Literature Review. International Workshop on Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation (Vol. 53). IDS Working Paper 70. 1997.
 
[32]  Ostrom, E., Gibson, C., Shivakumar, S. & Andersson, K. Aid, Incentives, and Sustainability: An Institutional Analysis of Development Cooperation, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University, Sida Studies in Evaluation 02/01, 2002.
 
[33]  Republic of South Africa. 2008. Basic Concepts in Monitoring and Evaluation. Public Service Commission, Pretoria, South Africa.
 
[34]  Kanyamuna, V., Mulonda, M. & Mulele, C.S. Monitoring and Evaluation Legislation in Zambia-Gap Analysis. International Journal of Humanities, Art and Social Studies, 2019. 4(1): 15-25.
 
[35]  Zambia Monitoring and Evaluation Association. National Evaluation Advocacy and Strategy-2018-2021. Lusaka, 2018.
 
[36]  GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. Fifth National Development Plan 2006-2010: Broad based wealth and job creation through citizenry participation and technological advancement, Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning, 2006.
 
[37]  GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. Report of the Final Evaluation of the Fifth National Development Plan 2006-2010. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning, 2014.
 
[38]  Kanyamuna, V., Mubita, A., Ng’andu, E., Mizinga, C. & Mwale, A. 2018. An Assessment of the Demand-Side of the Monitoring and Evaluation System of the Health Sector in Zambia. World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2018. 4(2): p. 75-86.
 
[39]  Kanyamuna, V. Analysis of Zambia’s Whole-of-Government Monitoring and Evaluation System in the context of National Development Plans. Doctorate Thesis. University of South Africa, 2019.
 
[40]  Mubita, A., Mulonda, M., Libati, M., Mwale, N. & Kanyamuna, V. Urban Informality and Small Scale Enterprise (SME) Development in Zambia: An Exploration of Theory and Practice, Journal of Behavioural Economics, Finance, Entrepreneurship, Accounting and Transport, 2017. 5(1): p.19-29.
 
[41]  World Bank. Improving the Quality of Public Expenditure through the use of Performance Information in Mexico. IEG, The World Bank, Washington, D.C., 2012.
 
[42]  GRZ. Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock (MAL - Zambia). 2012. Methodology to Design the Monitoring and Evaluation System for the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, Lusaka: Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock.
 
[43]  GRZ. Ministry of National Development Planning. National Monitoring and Evaluation Policy (2019-2023): Results-oriented, evidence-based, integrated and well-coordinated Government-wide Monitoring and Evaluation System for improved development results. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning, 2019.
 
[44]  World Bank. Institutionalising Impact Evaluation within the framework of a Monitoring and Evaluation System. IEG. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., 2009.
 
[45]  GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. National Planning and Budgeting Policy: Responsive, transparent, accountable and results-oriented Development Planning and Budgeting processes. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning, 2014.
 
[46]  OECD/DAC. 2002. Glossary of Key Terms in Evaluation and Results Based Management. Evaluation and Aid Effectiveness. Paris, OECD Publications.
 
[47]  GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. 2013. 2012 Annual Progress Report for the Sixth National Development Plan 2011-2015: Sustainable Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
 
[48]  Feinstein, O. 2011. National Evaluation Capacity: Lessons Learned and a Conceptual Scheme. In: National Evaluation Capacities. Proceedings from the International Conference on National Evaluation Capacities. 15-17 December 2009, Casablanca, Kingdom of Morocco. UNDP.
 
[49]  GRZ. Ministry of Health. Health Strategy (2017-2021). Lusaka: Ministry of Health.
 
[50]  Kanyamuna, V., Phiri, M., Kanenga, H. & Mulonda, M. (2020). “Role of Actors Outside Government in Strengthening the Country Monitoring and Evaluation System in Zambia.” World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, vol. 6, no. 1: 22-29.
 
[51]  Leftwich, A. Developmental states, effective states and poverty reduction: The primacy of politics-UNRISD Project on Poverty Reduction and Policy Regimes. University of York, 2008.
 
[52]  Republic of South Africa. Basic Concepts in Monitoring and Evaluation. Public Service Commission, Pretoria, South Africa, 2008.
 
[53]  Holvoet, N., Inberg, L. & Sekirime, S. Institutional analysis of monitoring and evaluation systems: Comparing M&E systems in Uganda's health and education sectors. Working Paprer, Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of Antwerp, 2013.
 
[54]  GRZ. Ministry of Health. 2017. Human Resources for Health Planning and Development Strategy Framework. Lusaka: Ministry of Health.
 
[55]  Holvoet, N., Inberg, L. & Sekirime, S. Institutional analysis of monitoring and evaluation systems: Comparing M&E systems in Uganda's health and education sectors. Working Paprer, Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of Antwerp, 2013.
 
[56]  GRZ. Ministry of National Development Planning. 2015 Annual Progress Report for the Revised Sixth National Development Plan 2013-2016: People Centred Economic Growth and Development. Lusaka: Ministry of National Development Planning, 2006.
 
[57]  GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. Fifth National Development Plan 2010 Annual Progress Review: Broad Based Wealth and Job Creation through Citizenry Participation and Technological Advancement. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning, 2011.
 
[58]  GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. 2012 Annual Progress Report for the Sixth National Development Plan 2011-2015: Sustainable Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning, 2013.
 
[59]  Mulonda, M., Kanyamuna, V. & Kanenga, H. State-Civil Society relationship in Zambia, International Journal of Humanities, Art and Social Studies, 2018. 3(4): p. 17-26.
 
[60]  Habanyati, H., Simui, F., Kanyamuna, V., & Muleya, G. (2020) Lived Experiences of Multi-Banked Bank Account Holders with a focus on Banks at Manda Hill Mall Lusaka, Zambia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(6) 208-223.