Vincent Kanyamuna^1,, Moonga Hangoma Mumba¹, Augustine Mkandawire¹, Mulonda Munalula¹, Valentine Kalonje¹

To ascertain the opportunities and challenges in using information from Zambia’s whole-of-government monitoring and evaluation system (WoGM&ES) was the main aim of this research study. The study is premised on the conviction that the acquisition and use of information from M&E is what lacks in key development decision- and policy- making development processes. Thus, the Zambian government would do well to strengthen the M&E function and improve its culture of using results across the public sector. The research approach taken was investigatory and descriptive. Two analysis tools were employed for data collection, collation, discussion, drawing of conclusions and recommendations as well as presentation—a diagnostic tool and the LEADS scoring system. While Zambia’s public sector system for M&E was in place, it was found to be weak in many ways. Efforts to improve the system were acknowledged by several stakeholders but clearly, the M&E gaps still left much to be desired if the country’s use of evidence to inform development processes was to match expected local and global standards. Using results from the diagnostic checklist and the LEADS scoring system, useful insights critical to assist the Government of Zambia and other stakeholders have been identified and espoused. Thus, national and decentralised level-government structures, civil society, parliament, academia, donors and other key stakeholders have been identified to be crucial partners towards enhancing the demand and use of information from M&E within and outside government. Collaborations by these stakeholders will lead to a strengthened WoGM&ES for Zambia’s public sector.

M&E Outputs, monitoring, evaluation, whole-of-government monitoring and evaluation system, diagnostic checklist, LEADS scoring system, good governance, results-based, evidence-based, Zambia