Design and Development of DASIG NAME: A Gamified Reviewer Application for BS Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering Students

Sean Honey Jane B. Odal^{1, 2,} and Laila S. Lomibao¹

¹Department of Mathematics Education, University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines

²University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Jasaan, Philippines

Cite this paper:
Sean Honey Jane B. Odal and Laila S. Lomibao. Design and Development of DASIG NAME: A Gamified Reviewer Application for BS Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering Students. Journal of Innovations in Teaching and Learning. 2026; 6(1):31-36. doi: 10.12691/jitl-6-1-5

Abstract

This study aimed to designed and developed Dasig NAME, a gamified reviewer on Integral Calculus. The developed reviewer was assessed by 20 Mathematics and IT experts. Descriptive analysis using mean and standard deviation were employed to analyze the expert assessments. Inter-rater reliability using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were also used to assess the level of agreement between experts. The mathematics experts evaluated the gamified reviewer based on two categories: content, and instructional quality. While The IT experts evaluated the gamified reviewer on its usability, based on three categories: system usefulness, information quality, and interface quality. Results shows that mathematics experts rated the DASIG NAME as very highly acceptable for each indicator. ICC results also suggest a moderate agreement between the mathematics experts. IT experts’ evaluation showed that the gamified reviewer demonstrates good system usefulness and information quality, while interface quality emerges as an area for improvement. However, the low level of agreement among IT experts highlights the need for further refinement to enhance overall usability and strengthen expert consensus.

Keywords:
gamification Integral Calculus gamified reviewer

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

References:

[1]	Akakpo, G. The Role and Relevance of Mathematics in the Maritime Industry: A Literature Study.
[2]	Amanonce, J.-C. T. (2020). Mathematics college readiness of grade 12 students: Basis for instructional enhancement. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 8(3).
[3]	Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5).
[4]	De Jesus, M. J. T., & Balahadia, F. F. (2022). I-LETyouReview: Gamifying Philippines’ Licensure Examination for Teachers Reviewer. Proceedings - 2022 2nd International Conference in Information and Computing Research, ICORE 2022.
[5]	Alan, F., American, T. M.-, & 2022, undefined. (2022). Inquiry-Based Online General Education Mathematics (GEM) Reviewer Promoting Mock Licensure Examination for Teachers Performance. Article.Scieducationalresearch.Com, 10(5), 276–281. http:// article. scieducationalresearch.com/pdf/EDUCATION-10-5-2.pdf.
[6]	Angeles, M. R., Deocaris, C. C., Co, C. B., & Arenas, S. U. (2014). “Make-It-ECE”, a Mathematics Learning Management System (LMS) for Engineering Students in the Philippines. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(9).
[7]	Toda, A. M., Klock, A. C. T., Oliveira, W., Palomino, P. T., Rodrigues, L., Shi, L., Bittencourt, I., Gasparini, I., Isotani, S., & Cristea, A. I. (2019). Analysing gamification elements in educational environments using an existing Gamification taxonomy. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1).
[8]	Moore, G. T., & Piaget, J. (1971). Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. Journal of Architectural Education (1947-1974), 25(4).
[9]	Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. In Harvard University Press.
[10]	Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2).
[11]	Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A Social Cognitive View of Self-Regulated Academic Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3).
[12]	Cajandig, A. J. S. , & Lomibao, L. S. (2020). 5I’s Learning Path with Cultural Approach Embedded to CAI on Student’s Conceptual Understanding. American Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 772-778.
[13]	Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2016). Quantifying the User Experience: Practical Statistics for User Research, Second Edition. In Quantifying the User Experience: Practical Statistics for User Research, Second Edition.
[14]	Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information and Management, 42(1).