Unveiling the Determinants of Underperformance in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA): A Systematic Literature Review

Paul John E. Calam^1, and Maria Antonieta A. Bacabac¹

¹University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines

Cite this paper:
Paul John E. Calam and Maria Antonieta A. Bacabac. Unveiling the Determinants of Underperformance in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA): A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Innovations in Teaching and Learning. 2024; 4(1):44-47. doi: 10.12691/jitl-4-1-7

Abstract

The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) provides a crucial benchmark for evaluating educational systems worldwide, yet numerous countries consistently underperform, necessitating an in-depth examination of the underlying factors. To address the gap, this systematic review of the literature was conducted. Six (6) scientific databases were employed to execute systematic reviews: Scopus, Frontiers, Eric, Springer, Academia, and Semantic Scholar. The researcher only considers research from 2014–2024 in the publication dates. This systematic literature review aims to unveil the determinants of underperformance in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Through thematic analysis of existing research, three major themes emerged as critical factors: socio-economic status, teacher quality and training, and educational system and policies. Socioeconomic status significantly affects student performance, as lower socio-economic backgrounds are associated with limited access to educational resources, financial stress, and inadequate parental support. The educational system and policies also play a crucial role, with outdated curricula, inequitable resource distribution, and ineffective policy implementation creating environments that hinder student learning. Teacher quality and training are essential, as effective teaching depends on deep subject knowledge, strong pedagogical skills, and ongoing professional development. Insufficiently trained or unsupported teachers struggle to meet diverse student needs, leading to poorer outcomes. This review underscores the need for holistic interventions addressing these determinants to improve PISA performance and ensure equitable education for all students.

Keywords:
PISA educational underperformance socio-economic factors teacher quality educational policies systematic review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	OECD. (2018). PISA 2018 Results. Combined Executive Summaries. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689-1699.
[2]	OECD. (2022). PISA 2022 Results. https:// www.oecd.org/ publication/pisa-2022-results/country-notes/philippines-a0882a2d/.
[3]	Özer, M. (2020). What Does PISA Tell Us About Performance of Education Systems?. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 9(2), 217-228.
[4]	Perera, L. D. H., & Asadullah, M. N. (2019). Mind the gap: What explains Malaysia’s underperformance in Pisa?. International Journal of Educational Development, 65, 254-263.
[5]	AlAli, R. & Wardat, Y. (2024). Empowering education through digital transformation: Confronting educational wastage in basic education schools in Jordan. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies. 7, 3 (May 2024), 1148–1162.
[6]	Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
[7]	Alshalhoub, S., et al. (2021). The Economic and Social Situation and Its Impact on Students' Performance in Mathematics In The PISA 2018 International Study In The Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia. Ilkogretim Online, 20(6).
[8]	Flores-Mendoza, C., et al. (2021). General Intelligence and Socioeconomic Status as strong predictors of student performance in Latin American Schools: Evidence from PISA items. Front. Educ. 6:632289.
[9]	Wang, X., et al. (2023). Factors Predicting Mathematics Achievement in PISA: A Systematic Review. Large-scale Assessments in Education, v11 Article 24. Eric.
[10]	Alshalawi, A. S., & Alqurashi, H. S. (2022). Factors Affecting Saudi Students’ Achievement In Reading Literacy In Light Of PISA 2018. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(10), 1815-1829.
[11]	Avendano, R., et al. (2016). Understanding student performance beyond traditional factors: Evidence from PISA 2012. OECD Development Centre Working Papers, (331), 1.
[12]	Barger, B. (2014). A quantitative study of educational poverty, school location, and student achievement measured by the program for international student assessment (PISA). Lindenwood University.
[13]	Karakolidis, A., Pitsia, V., & Emvalotis, A. (2016). Mathematics low achievement in Greece: A multilevel analysis of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012 data. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 9(1), 3-24. https:// www.learntechlib.org/p/173602/
[14]	Huang, H., & Sebastian, J. (2015). The role of schools in bridging within-school achievement gaps based on socioeconomic status: a cross-national comparative study. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45(4), 501-525.
[15]	Jin, S., et al. (2022). Factors associated with academic resilience in disadvantaged students: An analysis based on the PISA 2015 BSJG (China) sample. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 846466.
[16]	Gutiérrez-de-Rozas, B., & López-Martín, E., & Carpintero Molina, E. (2022). Defining the profile of students with low academic achievement: A cross-country analysis through PISA 2018 data. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 7, p. 910039). Frontiers.
[17]	Rughoonauth, N. (2021). The impact of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) on aspects of education policy reform in Germany. https://osf.io/preprints/edarxiv/upd5n
[18]	Lin, S., et al. (2021). Taiwan: Performance in the Programme for International Student Assessment. Improving a Country’s Education: PISA 2018 Results in 10 Countries, 203-226.
[19]	Zhang, H. (2018). Individual cognitive and contextual factors affecting Chinese students’ mathematical literacy: a hierarchical linear modeling approach using Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012 (Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University). http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9629-6405
[20]	DepEd (2021). DepEd launches the Professional Development Program on Assessment and Emerging Literacies with focus on PISA. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2021/10/26/deped-launches-the-professional-development-program-on-assessment-and-emerging-literacies-with-focus-on-pisa/
[21]	Schleicher, A. (2012). Preparing Teachers and Developing School Leaders for the 21st Century: Lessons from around the World. OECD Publishing.