Journal of Business and Management Sciences
ISSN (Print): 2333-4495 ISSN (Online): 2333-4533 Website: Editor-in-chief: Heap-Yih Chong
Open Access
Journal Browser
Journal of Business and Management Sciences. 2021, 9(4), 205-214
DOI: 10.12691/jbms-9-4-6
Open AccessArticle

Taiwanese People’s Decision to Vaccinate against COVID-19: The Impact of Information Source on Vaccination Decisions

Ching-Fang Wu1, Shih-Chieh Fang1, and Ching Ying Huang1

1Department of Business Administration, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

Pub. Date: December 07, 2021

Cite this paper:
Ching-Fang Wu, Shih-Chieh Fang and Ching Ying Huang. Taiwanese People’s Decision to Vaccinate against COVID-19: The Impact of Information Source on Vaccination Decisions. Journal of Business and Management Sciences. 2021; 9(4):205-214. doi: 10.12691/jbms-9-4-6


The success of the vaccination program depends on the coverage rate of the group. However, vaccination decision-making is a complex and dynamic issue that is affected by various factors. In addition to personal knowledge and attitudes about viruses and vaccines, it is also affected by the social environment, such as how the media describe the pandemic changes and the effectiveness of vaccines in news. The main purpose of this study is as follows. (1) To evaluate the decision-making of people in Taiwan to receive the COVID-19 vaccine and its influencing factors when a vaccine is available during the Level 3 alert period. (2) To understand whether the type of public access to COVID-19 information is related to the COVID-19 vaccine decision. This is a cross-sectional study. The study period is from June 30 to July 30, 2021, which is the Level 3 alert period in Taiwan. The subjects of the study are over 18 years old and live in Taiwan. Eventually 1,108 participants were included in the analysis. Chi-square, odds ratio, and binary logistic regression were used for the analysis. Overall, 88.62% of the participants expressed their willingness to receive the vaccine. The results of the study found that the willingness of vaccination has nothing to do with socio-demographic factors. The factors related to the willingness of vaccination are the degree of chronic disease, whether there is currently a vaccination insurance or anti-pandemic insurance, and attitudes and beliefs about COVID-19. For every 1-point increase in the Attitudes and Belief Scale scores, the odds of being willing to be vaccinated increase by 1.7 times. In addition, the type of information source is also related to the vaccination willingness, especially from official information, including the “Press Conference of the Department of Disease Control”, “Ministry of Health and Welfare website, Facebook or LINE”, “President’s Facebook or LINE”, “The Facebook or LINE of the heads of counties and cities.” After controlling the attitudes and beliefs about COVID-19, the degree of chronic disease and the availability of related insurance, participants who came into contact with the CDC press conference were 1.539 times more likely to be willing to be vaccinated than other participants, and those who came into contact with the Facebook or LINE of the heads of counties and cities were 2.401 times more likely than other participants.

COVID-19 vaccination decision information dissemination binary logistic regression analysis

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  Statement on the second meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005). Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). (2005, 0921). WHO Statement on the Second Meeting of the International Health Regulations. Retrieved from -international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-outbreak-of-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov)?fbclid=IwAR3lxTaKfkB5MZnLDYKbHIB3xbfSfxJBfzvpP_p1vR34EOGQxMZQUIzUF0k%3 futm_source%3dnewhomesdirectory&gclid=Cj0KCQiAhZT9BRDmARIsAN2E-J20WPs-v8jute-Od8QQJFA-FGFbAkRdeUEeX_r9y65nd2nRoD_GE3EaAq0cEALw_wcB&utm_campaign=newhomesdirectory_listings&utm_
[2]  Summers, J., Cheng, H. Y., Lin, H. H., Barnard, L. T., Kvalsvig, A., Wilson, N., & Baker, M. G. (2020). Potential lessons from the Taiwan and New Zealand health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Reg Health West Pac, 4, 100044.
[3]  Which Countries Have Protected Both Health and the Economy in the pandemic? (2020, 2021/09/27). Our World Data. Retrieved from
[4]  Randolph, H. E., & Barreiro, L. B. (2020). Herd Immunity: Understanding COVID-19. Immunity, 52(5), 737-741.
[5]  Kumar, D., Chandra, R., Mathur, M., Samdariya, S., & Kapoor, N. (2016). Vaccine hesitancy: understanding better to address better. Isr J Health Policy Res, 5, 2.
[6]  Benin, A. L., Wisler-Scher, D. J., Colson, E., Shapiro, E. D., & Holmboe, E. S. (2006). Qualitative Analysis of Mothers' Decision-Making About Vaccines for Infants: The Importance of Trust. Pediatrics, 117(5), 1532-1541.
[7]  Opel, D. J., Mangione-Smith, R., Taylor, J. A., Korfiatis, C., Wiese, C., Catz, S., & Martin, D. P. (2011). Development of a survey to identify vaccine-hesitant parents. Human Vaccines, 7(4), 419-425.
[8]  Organization, W. H. (2015). Report of the SAGE working group on Vaccine Hesitancy. 2014. Paper presented at the Available on: http://www. who. int/immunization/sage/meetings/2014/october/SAGE_working_group_revised_report_vaccine_hesitancy. pdf [Last accessed: 2017, Mar 21].
[9]  Salmon, D. A., Dudley, M. Z., Glanz, J. M., & Omer, S. B. (2015). Vaccine hesitancy: Causes, consequences, and a call to action. Vaccine, 33 Suppl 4, D66-71.
[10]  Paul, E., Steptoe, A., & Fancourt, D. (2021). Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: Implications for public health communications. Lancet Reg Health Eur, 1, 100012.
[11]  Lazarus, J. V., Ratzan, S. C., Palayew, A., Gostin, L. O., Larson, H. J., Rabin, K., . . . El-Mohandes, A. (2021). A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nat Med, 27(2), 225-228.
[12]  Malik, A. A., McFadden, S. M., Elharake, J., & Omer, S. B. (2020). Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in the US. EClinicalMedicine, 26, 100495.
[13]  Sherman, S. M., Smith, L. E., Sim, J., Amlôt, R., Cutts, M., Dasch, H., . . . Sevdalis, N. (2021). COVID-19 vaccination intention in the UK: results from the COVID-19 vaccination acceptability study (CoVAccS), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. Hum Vaccin Immunother, 17(6), 1612-1621.
[14]  Wong, M. C. S., Wong, E. L. Y., Huang, J., Cheung, A. W. L., Law, K., Chong, M. K. C., . . . Chan, P. K. S. (2021). Acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine based on the health belief model: A population-based survey in Hong Kong. Vaccine, 39(7), 1148-1156.
[15]  Tsai, F. J., Yang, H. W., Lin, C. P., & Liu, J. Z. (2021). Acceptability of COVID-19 Vaccines and Protective Behavior among Adults in Taiwan: Associations between Risk Perception and Willingness to Vaccinate against COVID-19. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18(11).
[16]  Schwarzinger, M., Watson, V., Arwidson, P., Alla, F., & Luchini, S. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a representative working-age population in France: a survey experiment based on vaccine characteristics. Lancet Public Health, 6(4), e210-e221.
[17]  Larson, H. J., Clarke, R. M., Jarrett, C., Eckersberger, E., Levine, Z., Schulz, W. S., & Paterson, P. (2018). Measuring trust in vaccination: A systematic review. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 14(7), 1599-1609.
[18]  Gangarosa, E. J., Galazka, A. M., Wolfe, C. R., Phillips, L. M., Gangarosa, R. E., Miller, E., & Chen, R. T. (1998). Impact of anti-vaccine movements on pertussis control: the untold story. Lancet, 351(9099), 356-361.
[19]  Babalola, S. (2011). Maternal reasons for non-immunisation and partial immunisation in northern Nigeria. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 47(5), 276-281.
[20]  Babalola, S., & Lawan, U. (2009). Factors predicting BCG immunization status in northern Nigeria: a behavioral-ecological perspective. Journal of Child Health Care, 13(1), 46-62.
[21]  Patra, N. (2009). A Probe into the Ways to Stimulate Childhood Immunisation in India: Findings from NFHS-III. Available at SSRN 1117614.
[22]  Rahman, M., & Obaida-Nasrin, S. (2010). Factors affecting acceptance of complete immunization coverage of children under five years in rural Bangladesh. Salud pública de méxico, 52, 134-140.
[23]  Chen, M.-F., Wang, R.-H., Schneider, J. K., Tsai, C.-T., Jiang, D. D.-S., Hung, M.-N., & Lin, L.-J. (2011). Using the Health Belief Model to Understand Caregiver Factors Influencing Childhood Influenza Vaccinations. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 28(1), 29-40.
[24]  Morin, A., Lemaître, T., Farrands, A., Carrier, N., & Gagneur, A. (2012). Maternal knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding gastroenteritis and rotavirus vaccine before implementing vaccination program: which key messages in light of a new immunization program? Vaccine, 30(41), 5921-5927.
[25]  FIND/Technical Office of the Ministry of Economic Affairs. (2016). More than 80% of Taiwanese love to use Facebook and Line to be the leader of social networking sites. One person has an average of 4 social accounts. Young people love YouTube and IG more. 2016)/ Service System Drives Emerging Business R&D Plans (2/4). Retrieved from
[26]  DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Newbury Park: CA: Sage Publications.
[27]  Banerji, A., Wickner, P. G., Saff, R., Stone, C. A., Jr., Robinson, L. B., Long, A. A., . . . Blumenthal, K. G. (2021). mRNA Vaccines to Prevent COVID-19 Disease and Reported Allergic Reactions: Current Evidence and Suggested Approach. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 9(4), 1423-1437.
[28]  Ozawa, S., & Stack, M. L. (2013). Public trust and vaccine acceptance--international perspectives. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 9(8), 1774-1778.
[29]  Survey Report on Digital Opportunities of Individual Households in 108 years. (2019). Survey report on digital opportunities (gap) over the years. Retrieved from
[30]  Taiwan Centers for Disease Control. In response to the continuing severity of the local pandemic, the command center will raise the national pandemic alert to the third level from now until May 28. All localities have simultaneously tightened and increased pandemic prevention restrictions and strictly adhered to community defense lines. Press release. Retrieved from