American Journal of Educational Research. 2018, 6(12), 1593-1599
DOI: 10.12691/education-6-12-1
Open AccessArticle
Vina Serevina1, , Wawan Andriana1 and Anan Fernandianto1
1Physics Education, State University of Jakarta, East Jakarta, Indonesia
Pub. Date: December 06, 2018
Cite this paper:
Vina Serevina, Wawan Andriana and Anan Fernandianto. Improving Creative Thinking Ability of Class X Students Public High School 59 Jakarta through Guided Inquiry Learning Model. American Journal of Educational Research. 2018; 6(12):1593-1599. doi: 10.12691/education-6-12-1
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to know whether guided inquiry learning model can improve student’s creative thinking ability of class X-1 Public High School 59 Jakarta. This research is a classroom action research according to Kurt Lewin model: (1) planning, (2) acting, (3) observing, and (4) reflecting. Research was conducted from January 2017 to June 2017 with 36 students at Public High School 59, class X-1, Jakarta, Indonesia as experiment subject. Data was collected through observation, written test and documentation. The result of student’s creative thinking ability obtained by 52,00% for fluency aspect in cycle 1 and 60,57% in cycle 2. Flexibility aspect increased from 44.29% in cycle 1 to 55.71% in cycle 2, originality aspect increased from 49, 52% in cycle 1 to 59,05% in cycle 2, and elaboration aspect increased from 45,71% in cycle 1 to 58,57% in cycle 2. According to the obtained data, it can be concluded that guided inquiry learning model can improve student’s creative thinking ability in fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration aspects.Keywords:
creative thinking ability guided inquiry learning model
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
References:
[1] | Bono, E. D. (2007). Revolusi Berpikir. Bandung: Kaifa. |
|
[2] | Poerwadarminta, W. J. (1976). Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PN Balai Pustaka. |
|
[3] | Johnson, E. B. (2006). Contextual Teaching and Learning Menjadikan Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar Mengasyikkan dan Bermakna. Bandung: MCC. |
|
[4] | Amien, M. (1987). Mengajarkan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA) dengan Menggunakan Metode Discovery atau Inquiry. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. |
|
[5] | Munandar, U. (1999). Mengembangkan Bakat dan Kreativitas Anak Sekolah Penuntun Bagi Guru dan Orang Tua. Jakarta: PT Grasindo. |
|
[6] | Munandar, U. (2009). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. |
|
[7] | Kuhlthau, C. C., Leslie, M. K., & Caspary, A. K. (2007). Guided Inquiry: Learning in The 21st Century. London: Libraries Unlimited. |
|
[8] | Trianto. (2007). Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher. |
|
[9] | Sumarsono, J. (2009). Fisika Untuk SMA/MA Kelas X. Jakarta: Depdiknas. |
|
[10] | Halliday, R. (2014). Fundamental Physics. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
|
[11] | Cutnell, J. (2014). Physics th9 Edition. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
|
[12] | Drafting Team. (2017). Modul Pembelajaran Fisika SMA Kelas X. Jakarta: PPG SM-3T Fisika Universitas Negeri Jakarta. |
|
[13] | Suyanti, R. D. (2010). Strategi Pembelajaran Kimia. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu. |
|