Blended Learning Simulation Based Model Development

Sri Rahayu Surtiningtyas^1,

¹Department of Educational Technology, Postgraduate Program Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia

Cite this paper:
Sri Rahayu Surtiningtyas. Blended Learning Simulation Based Model Development. American Journal of Educational Research. 2017; 5(11):1114-1119. doi: 10.12691/education-5-11-1

Abstract

This paper presents the formative evaluation for an instructional model for Aerodrome Flight Information training development. The developed instructional model was a blending of e-briefing with face-to-face role-play simulation and debriefing. The aim of this study was to improve the effectiveness of the developed instructional model. This study employed a formative evaluation by Tessmer (2013) with used both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The respondent of field test is 22 students of the 2016-2017 academic years. The formative evaluation was consisted of expert review, one-to-one, small group, and field test. This research was carried out at Indonesia Civil Aviation Institute. The data were collected through open-end interview, questionnaire, and field observation. The data analysis used descriptive statistic method. The finding indicates that the blended learning simulation based model increased learning outcome (+12.55); students and instructors were more satisfy when they implemented this model (4.47); and the model increased student’s attention level (4.5). Based on the findings, the proposed instructional model can be implemented in this institution.

Keywords:
blended learning simulation instructional model

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Branch , R. M., Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach, New York: Springer, 2009, p. 1.
[2]	Tessmer, M., Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluations Improving the Quality of Education and Training, Oxon: Routledge, 2013, p. 12.
[3]	Dick, W., Carey, L., and Carey, J. O., The Systematic Design of Instruction, New York: Pearson, 2015, pp. 284-285.
[4]	Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P. and Borg, W. R., Educational Research, 8th ed., Boston: Pearson, 2007, p. 590.
[5]	Kearns, S. K., e-learning In Aviation, Burlington: Ashgate, 2010, p. 154.
[6]	Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P. and Borg, W. R., Educational Research, 8th ed., Boston: Pearson, 2007, p. 591.
[7]	Vesper, J. L., Kartoglu, U., Herrington, J. and Reeves, T. C., “Incorporating risk assessment into the formative evaluation of an authentic e-learning program,” British Journal of Educational Technology, p. 5, 2015.
[8]	Tessmer, M., Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluations Improving the Quality of Education and Training, Oxon: Routledge, 2013, p. 35.
[9]	Dick, W., Carey, L., and Carey, J. O., The Systematic Design of Instruction, New York: Pearson, 2015, pp. 260-310.
[10]	Saphiro, S. and Wilk, M., “An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples),” Biometrika, pp. 602, 608, 1965.
[11]	Bordens, K. S. and Abbott, B. B., Research Design and Methods, New York: Mc. Graw Hill, 2014, p. 450.
[12]	Triantafillou, E., Pomportsis, A. and Demetriadis, S., “The design and the formative evaluation of an adaptive educational system based on cognitive styles,” Computers & Education, vol. 41, pp. 87-103, 2003.