American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2017, 5(1), 63-68
DOI: 10.12691/education-5-1-10
Open AccessReview Article

A Systematic Review on the Most Effective Method Teaching Dentistry to Dental Students Compared to Video Based Learning

Vidhya. Gopinath1, and Deepak. Nallaswamy1

1Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India

Pub. Date: January 17, 2017

Cite this paper:
Vidhya. Gopinath and Deepak. Nallaswamy. A Systematic Review on the Most Effective Method Teaching Dentistry to Dental Students Compared to Video Based Learning. American Journal of Educational Research. 2017; 5(1):63-68. doi: 10.12691/education-5-1-10

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the recent years, the use of assessment or adjunct tools as a part of teaching has become more wide spread across medical and dental schools. Educators have sought different methods of teaching in the dental curriculum The present curriculum has changed from teacher-centred approaches to more student learner approaches. Lectures, discussions, computer assisted learning, audiovisual source, video based learning, demonstration and role play are different teaching methods employed in educational institutions. Of which, video based learning is a major contributor in dental education. But still there is no clear summary for the evidence for the most effective method of teaching. The aim of this study was to assess the most effective method of teaching dentistry to dental students when compared to video based education. SEARCH METHODOLOGY: The database search yielded 40 articles out of which only 28 articles were selected after title exclusion.Full texts were obtained for the remaining 14 articles. 10 articles were selected based on the inclusion criteria and 4 articles were excluded based on the abstract. The finally selected 10 articles were subjected to data extraction. Results: Overall the studies included in this systematic review, there appears to be no difference in the effectiveness of the teaching method over the others. But video based teaching has proved better outcome as an adjunct with the other teaching methods.

Keywords:
video based learning teaching methods dental students systematic review

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Playdon, M. 1997. "Promoting Health in Hospitals.." Australian nursing journal (July 1993) 4(7): 18-19.
 
[2]  Kneller, G F. 1961. Education, Knowledge, and the Problem of Existence. Harvard Educational Review.
 
[3]  Dolhenty, J. n.d. What Is Wrong with Locke's Philosophy. The Radical Academy.
 
[4]  Basal, Ahmet. 2015. "The Implementation of a Flipped Classroom in Foreign Language Teaching." Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 0(0): 28-37.
 
[5]  Albanese, Mark A. and Susan Mitchell. 1993. "Problem-Based Learning: a Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues." Academic medicine 68(1): 52.
 
[6]  Koh, Gerald C.-H., Hoon E. Khoo, Mee L. Wong, and David Koh. 2008. "The Effects of Problem-Based Learning During Medical School on Physician Competency: a Systematic Review.." Canadian Medical Association Journal 178(1): 34-41.
 
[7]  Khatami, S and M I. MacEntee. 2011. Evolution of Clinical Reasoning in Dental Education. Journal of dental education.
 
[8]  Bligh, J. 2000. "Developing Research Capacity.." Medical education 34(1): 2-3.
 
[9]  Field, M J. 1995. Dental Education at the Crossroads: Challenges and Change. Washington DC: Institute of Medicine, Committee on the Future of Dental Education.
 
[10]  Ludwick, Ruth, Barbara C. Dieckman, Sherron Herdtner, Mary Dugan, and Molly Roche. 1998. "Documenting the Scholarship of Clinical Teaching Through Peer Review." Nurse Educator 23(6): 17.
 
[11]  Cowen, D L., G L. Davis, and S E. Bird. 1976. "Peer Review in Medical Education." Academic medicine 51(2): 130.
 
[12]  Farrell, John J., Richard S. Moog, and James N. Spencer. 1999. "A Guided-Inquiry General Chemistry Course." Journal of Chemical Education 76(4): 570.
 
[13]  Ruder, S M. and S S. Hunnicutt. 2008. POGIL in Chemistry Courses at a Large Urban University: a Case Study. ACS symposium series.
 
[14]  Spraggs, Gerry, Louisa Peaver, Phil Jones, and Peter Ede. 2015. "Re-Construction of Historic Drought in the Anglian Region (UK) Over the Period 1798-2010 and the Implications for Water Resources and Drought Management." Journal of Hydrology 526: 231-52.
 
[15]  Prince, M and R Felder. 2007. "The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning." Journal of College Science Teaching.
 
[16]  Vygotsky, L S. 1978. Mind in Society: the Development of Higher Mental Functions. Cambridge.
 
[17]  Ackerman, M N., W E. Acree, and S Pandey. 1998. "Abney, JR; Scalettar, BA Saving Your Students' Skin. Undergraduate Experiments That Probe UV Protection by Sunscreens and Sunglasses. June, 757-760." Journal of Chemical ¡­.
 
[18]  Nestel, Debra and Tanya Tierney. 2007. "Role-Play for Medical Students Learning About Communication: Guidelines for Maximising Benefits." 7(1): 3.
 
[19]  Brophy, Jere E. and Thomas L. Good. 1970. "Teachers¡® Communication of Differential Expectations for Children's Classroom Performance: Some Behavioral Data.." Journal of Educational Psychology 61(5): 365-74.
 
[20]  Trigwell, Keith, Elaine Martin, Joan Benjamin, and Michael Prosser 2010. "Scholarship of Teaching: a Model." Higher Education Research and Development 19(2): 155-68.
 
[21]  Trigwell, Keith and Michael Prosser. 1996. "Congruence Between Intention and Strategy in University Science Teachers' Approaches to Teaching." Higher Education 32(1): 77-87.