Students’ Perspective of Effective Supervision of Graduate Programmes in Ghana

James Awuni Azure^1,

¹University of Education, Winneba, Ghana

Cite this paper:
James Awuni Azure. Students’ Perspective of Effective Supervision of Graduate Programmes in Ghana. American Journal of Educational Research. 2016; 4(2):163-169. doi: 10.12691/education-4-2-4

Abstract

The study examined elements of effective supervision from Ghanaian graduate students’ perspective. One hundred and twenty-five graduate students of the Faculty of Science Education of the University of Education, Winneba, responded to two questionnaires. Descriptive statistics was used to describe the attributes of university supervisors of the graduate theses and Pearson chi-square test was employed to test students’ opinions on their supervisors, effective supervision and their relationships with six demographic factors. The results suggest that the three most important attributes of supervisors as perceived by graduate students were: supervisors should be friendly, approachable and flexible; knowledgeable and resourceful; and encourage students to work and plan independently. In addition, the results indicated that effective supervision means that supervisors are able to establish good and professional relationships with students; give support and guidance; and provide continuous motivation and inspiration. Using Pearson chi-square tests, it was found that there were no significant differences between attributes of supervisors and effective supervision based on programme, faculty, course structure, gender and semester. It is recommended that only senior and experienced faculty should be made to supervise graduate students. Also the quality of applicants should be one of the determining factors for admission to graduate programmes.

Keywords:
supervisors’ expertise effective supervision graduate students students’ perspectives

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Abiddin, N. Z. (2012). Postgraduate students’ perception on effective supervision: a case study at one public university in Malaysia. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects In Education (IJCDSE), 3(1), 635-639.
[2]	Abiddin, N. Z., Ishmael, A., & Ishmae l, A. (2012). Effective supervisory approach in enhancing postgraduate research studies. International journal of humanities and social science, 1(2), 206-217.
[3]	Abiddin, N. Z. & West, M. (2007). Supervision practices for foreign graduate research students. American journal of applied sciences, 4(6), 362-370.
[4]	Bak, N. (2004). Completing your thesis: A practical guide. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
[5]	Brown, G., & Atkins, M. (1988). Effective teaching in higher education. London: Methuen.
[6]	Buttrey, E. A., & Richter, E. M. (2006). An overview of elements that influence efficiency in postgraduate supervisory practice arrangements. International journal of educational management, 19(1), 7-26.
[7]	Cullen, D. J., Pearson, M., Sala, L. J., & Spear, R. H. (1994). Establishing effective PhD supervision. Canberra: Higher Education Division, Australia Government Publishing Service.
[8]	Drennan, J. (2008). Professional and academic destination of masters in nursing graduates: A national survey. Nurse Education Today 28, 751-759.
[9]	Gawe, E. C. (2015). The quality of MBA research supervision in Zimbabwean Universities. Global journal of educational studies, 1(1), 110-122.
[10]	Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. (2001). Questions to ask when thinking about pursuing a PhD. Retrieved on 15/08/2015 from http://www.phd-survey.org/advice.
[11]	Gupta, A. (2013). The best practices of graduate students. Retrieved on 20/10/15 from www.universityaffairs.ca/career.advice
[12]	Ismail, A., & Abiddin, N. Z. (2009). The importance of graduate students’ needs on supervisory contribution in a Malaysian public university. The Social Sciences, 4(4) 355-365.
[13]	Kimani, E. N. (2014). Challenges in quality control for postgraduate supervision. International journal of humanities, social sciences and education, 1(9), 63-70.
[14]	Lovitts, B.E. (2008). The transition to independent research: Who makes it, who doesn’t, and why. The Journal of Higher Education, 79, 296-325.
[15]	Mapesela, M. L. E, & Wilkinson, A. C. (2005). The pains and gains of supervising postgraduate students from a distance: The case of six students from Lesotho. South African Journal for Higher Education, 19: 1238-1254.
[16]	McAlpine, L, & Norton, J. (2006). Reframing our approach to doctoral programmes: an interactive framework for action and research. Higher Education Research and Development, 25 (1), 3-17.
[17]	McCulloch, A., (2007). ‘Improving PhD completion rates’, In suite 101, Retrieved 01 December 2015, from http://www.graduate-schools.suite101.com.
[18]	Metcalfe, J. (2000). The changing nature of doctoral programmes. Castle Park, Cambridge: CRAC Ltd.
[19]	Mutala, S. M. (2009). Building trust in supervisor–supervisee relationship: Case study of East and Southern Africa. Paper presented at PROLISSA Conference at UNISA, March 4-6, 2009.
[20]	Olibie, E. I., Agu, N. N., & Uzoechina, G.O. (2015). Characteristics of Post Graduate Education Research Mentoring in Universities in Nigeria: Curricula Enhancement Strategies. Curriculum and Teaching 4(1), 156-166.
[21]	Patton, M. O. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park: Sage.
[22]	Renske, A. de Kleijn, M., Meir, P. C., Pilot, A. & Brekelmans, M. (2014). The relationship between feedback perceptions and the supervisor-student relationship in a master’s thesis project. Teaching in Higher Education. Routledge,Taylor and Francis Group.
[23]	Roets, L., & Botma, Y. (2012). Cyclic efforts to improve completion rates of masters’ degree students in nursing. Curationis, 35 (1), 111-117.
[24]	Sinclair, M. (2 011).The pedagogy of good PhD supervision: A national cross-disciplinary investigation of PhD supervision. International journal of social sciences and humanities, 1(1), 15-29.
[25]	Sze, D. (2004). Effective Student-centred PhD Supervision from a Social Constructivist Viewpoint. Pharmacy Publication
[26]	UEW-19th Congregation (November, 2014). University of Education, Winneba: 19th Congregation Basic Statistics (First Session), page 41, Winneba: Publication Unit.
[27]	Wadesango, N., & Machingambi, S. (2011). Post graduate students’ experiences with research supervisors. Journal of sociology and social anthropology, 2(1), 31-37
[28]	Zaitun, A. B. (2010). Strategic cooperation to enhance quality in Doctoral supervision. Paper presented at the Third Conference on quality in university education in the Islamic World, Naif Arab University for Security Sciences (NAUSS), Riyadh, 20-11.