Influence of the Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Mentor Teachers and College Tutors to Classroom Practice of Student Teachers

James Awuni Azure^1,

¹Department of Biology Education, University of Education, Winneba

Cite this paper:
James Awuni Azure. Influence of the Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Mentor Teachers and College Tutors to Classroom Practice of Student Teachers. American Journal of Educational Research. 2015; 3(10):1216-1223. doi: 10.12691/education-3-10-2

Abstract

The study surveyed student teachers (n = 130) from two Colleges of Education in northern and southern Ghana who reported a significantly greater influence by school-based mentors on their teaching practice when they had been with them for 10 weeks. The study is correlational that employed a questionnaire that sought the opinions of student teachers on the influence of school mentors and college tutors on their classroom practice. Descriptive and correlational data analyses were performed on the data collected. Independent t-test was used to test the null hypothesis of research question 3 at .05 level of significance. The results of the study revealed that the correlations between student teachers’ perceptions of their school mentors’ PCK in planning and preparation of lessons, cordial relationship with the student teacher, feedback received, and methods of teaching and how these influenced their classroom practice were all statistically significant at p = < .05. The results also revealed that the correlations between student teachers’ perceptions of their college tutors’ PCK in planning and preparation of lessons, cordial relationship with the student teacher, feedback received, and methods of teaching and how these influenced their classroom practice were all statistically significant at p = < .05. However, t-test results indicated that student teachers related well with their school mentors than college tutors. The difference in this cordial relationship was statistically significant (t = 6.045, p < .01). The student teachers also perceived that they received more feedback from their school mentors than from their college tutors during their internship. The difference was again statistically significant (t = 4.565, p< = .01). These findings have important implications as they suggest a greater transfer of learning from the school to the classroom than from the college, producing student teachers who are willing to incorporate and implement school-based practices in a new context. Colleges of education need to have closer links with partnership schools than it is now. There is a growing need to rethink of student teaching and how to tightly link the university with the school system for effective and qualitative training of student teachers.

Keywords:
mentor teacher college tutor teaching practice student-teacher classroom behaviour

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Allsopp, H. D., DeMarie, D., Alvarez-Hatton, P., & Doone, E. (2006). Bridging the gap between theory and practice: Connecting courses with field experiences. Teacher education quarterly, 3(4), 19-35
[2]	Anamuah-Mensah, J. & Asabere-Ameyaw, A. (2009). Science and mathematics in Basic schools in Ghana. Accra: University of Education, Winneba.
[3]	Anamuah-Mensah, J., Mereku, D. K., & Ampiah-Ghartey (2008). Ghana Junior Secondary School students’ achievement in mathematics and science: Results from Ghana’s participation in 2007 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. Accra: MOEYS.
[4]	Anderson, A., Hamilton, R. J., & Hattie, J. (2004). Classroom climate and motivated behaviour in secondary schools. Learning environmental research, 7, 211-225.
[5]	Asplin, K.N & Marks, M. J. (2013). Increasing the influence of university supervisors during student teaching. Teaching and teacher education, 37(1), 237-342.
[6]	Azure, J. A. (2013). Stakeholders’ perceptions of the internship programme of the Department of Science Education, of the University of Education, Winneba. Unpublished PhD Thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies, UEW, Winneba.
[7]	Bates, A. J., & Burbank, M. D. (2008). Effective student teacher supervision in the era of No Child Left behind. The professional Educator, 32(2). Retrieved from http://www.theprofessionaleducator.org/articles/combinedfall.pdf.
[8]	Cares, S., Almeida, L. S. (2007). Positive aspects of the teacher training supervision: The student teacher perspectives. European journal of psychology of education, 22, 515-528.
[9]	Cares, S., Almeida, L. S., & Martins, C. (2010). The socio-emotional experiences of student teachers during practicum: A case of reality shock? The journal of educational research, 103, 17-27.
[10]	Centre for Teacher Development and Action Research (CETDAR, 2009). Student internship handbook: A guide for students, supervisors and partnership schools and colleges. Accra: Asante & Hittscher printing Press Ltd,
[11]	Eshun, V. (2014). Science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and its exhibition in classroom practice: A case study in the Accra Metropolis. Unpublished PhD Thesis Submitted to School of Graduate Studies, UEW, Winneba.
[12]	Farrell, T. (2003). Reflective thinking: The principles and practices. English teaching FORUM, 4, 14-40.
[13]	Fernandez, M. L. & Erbilgin, E. (2009). Examining the supervision of mathematics student teachers through analysis of conference communications. Educational studies in mathematics, 72, 93-110.
[14]	Glen, W. J. (2006). Model versus mentor: defining the necessary qualities of the effective cooperating teacher. Teacher education quarterly, 33, 85-95.
[15]	Goh, S. C., & Khine, M. S. (Eds.) (2002). Studies in educational learning environment: A international perspective. Singapore: World Scientific.
[16]	Hudson, P. M. (2007). Examining mentors’ practices for enhancing preservice teachers’ pedagogical development im mathematics and science. Mentoring and tutoring, 15(2), 207-217.
[17]	Hudson, P. M., Usak, M., & Savran-Gencer, P. (2010). Bench marking practices: A case study in Turkey. Eurasia journal of mathematics, science and technology education, 6(4), 254-252. Retrieved January 15, 2014 from http://www.tandfroline.com/loi/cete20.
[18]	Kane, R. G. & T. R. (2005). Reconstructing knowledge-in-action: learning from the authority of experience as a first-year teacher. In D. Beijaard, P. C. Meijer, G. Morine-Dershimer and T. Tillema (Eds.), Teacher professional development in changing conditions, p. 133-148.
[19]	Kelly. S. & Tannehill, D. (2012). The mentoring experience of an irish student teacher on his physical education teaching practicum. Graduate journal of sport, exercise and physical education research, 1, 4-64.
[20]	Kiggundu, E. (2007). Teaching practice in the Greater Vaal Triangle Area: The student teacher experience. Journal of college teaching and learning, 4(6), 25-36.
[21]	Landrum, T. J., & Kauffman, J. M. (2006). Behavioural approaches to classroom management. In C.M. Everton & C.S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[22]	Le, P. T. A., & Vasquez, C. (2011). Feedback in teacher education: mentor discourse and intern perceptions. Teacher development, 15(4), 453-470.
[23]	Marks, M. J. (2002). From coursework to classroom: a qualitative study on the influences of pre-service teacher socialization. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Cincinnati, OH.
[24]	McKinney, S. E., Haberman, M., Stafford-Johnson, D., & Robinson, J. (2008). Developing teachers for high poverty schools: The role of the internship experience. Urban education, 43, 68-82.
[25]	Moore, D. A., Leamon, M. H., Cox, P. D., & Servis, M. E. (2002). Teaching implications of different educational theories and approaches. The veterinary teacher, 29(2), 117-123.
[26]	Musingafi, C. C. M., & Mafumbate, R. (2014). Challenges and prospects for school of student teachers in Zimbabwe: Academics, mentees and mentors perceptions. Asian journal of economics and empirical research, 1 (2), 32-39.
[27]	NCATE Institutional Report (2010). Cooperating teachers and university supervisors quality summary. Colorado: University of Colorado.
[28]	Odom, A. L., Stoddard, E. R., & LaNasa, S. M. (2007). Teacher Practices and Middle school Science Achievements. Internal journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1329-1346
[29]	Oppong, C. A. (2013). Supervisors’ remarks in teaching practice: the perspectives of history student teachers. Journal of education and practice, 4(17), 154-161.
[30]	Park, S., Jang, J. Y., Chen, Y. & Jung, J. (2010). Is pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) necessary for reformed science teaching? Evidence from an empirical study. Research in science education, 41(2), 245-260.
[31]	Silva, D. Y. (2000). Triad journaling as a tool for recoceptualising supervision in the professional development school. National association for research and science teaching. Retrieved April 4, 2013, from www://nasrst.org.
[32]	Su, J. Z. X. (1992). Sources of influence in preservice teacher socialization. Journal of education for teaching, 18, 239-258.
[33]	Tsui, A. B. M.,Lopez-Real, F., Law, Y. K., Tang, R., & Shun, M. S. K.(2001). Roles and relationships in tripartite supervisory conferencing processes. Journal of curriculum and supervision, 16, 322-344.
[34]	Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[35]	Waghorn, A., & Raths, K. (1996). Communication between theory and practice: how student teachers develop theories of teaching. Australian journal of teacher education. Retrieved 03/09/15 from http://dx.doi.org/10.14221.
[36]	Wei, S. L., & Elias, H. (2011). Relationship between students’ perceptions of classroom environment and their motivation in learning English language. International journal of humanities and social sciences, 1(21), 240-250.
[37]	Wilder, A., & Croker, D. L. (1999). How can we better train our student teachers? English journal, 88, 17-21
[38]	Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
[39]	Zanting, A. (2001). Mining the mentor’s mind: the elicitation of mentor teachers’ practical knowledge by prospective teachers. ICLON Graduate School of Education, University of Leiden: The Netherlands.
[40]	Zeichner, K. M. (2002). Beyond traditional structures of student teaching. Teacher education quarterly, 29, 59-64.
[41]	Zheng, B. & Webb, L. (2000). A new model of student teacher supervision: Perceptions of supervising teachers. Mid-South Education Research Association, Bowling Green, KY.