The Study of Second Language Acquisition Under Socio-Cultural Theory

Liang Aimin^1,

¹School of Foreign Languages, University of Jinan, Jinan City, China

Cite this paper:
Liang Aimin. The Study of Second Language Acquisition Under Socio-Cultural Theory. American Journal of Educational Research. 2013; 1(5):162-167. doi: 10.12691/education-1-5-3

Abstract

Socio-Cultural Theory, based on Vygotskian thought, is a theory about the development of human cognitive and higher mental function. The theory specially emphasizes the integration of social, cultural and biological elements in learning processes and stresses the socio-cultural circumstances’ central role in human’s cognitive development. Second Language Acquisition is concerned with the process of how a new language other than the native language is acquired and how much this is affected by other disciplines, among which is Socio-Cultural Theory. This theory facilitates reflection on some of the problems on second language acquisition from a new perspective. In addition, this new perspective provides some pedagogical implications for foreign language teaching. This article makes attempts to elucidate Social-Cultural Theory’s constructs, its influence on second language acquisition and the pedagogical implications for foreign language teaching.

Keywords:
socio-cultural theory second language acquisition higher mental function foreign language teaching

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Brown, H. D. Principles of language learning and teaching, Pearson Education Inc. New York 2007,30-36.
[2]	Bruner, J. Actual minds, possible worlds, Harvard University Press. Massachusetts, 1986,45-61.
[3]	Centeno-Cortés, B.. Private speech in the second language classroom: Its role in internalization and its link to social production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University. University Park, 2003,45-60.
[4]	Chaiklin, S. The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev, & S. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003, 39-64.
[5]	Chomsky, N. Language and mind, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, NY, 1968,78-94.
[6]	Cook, V. Second language learning and language teaching, Hodder Education. London, 2008, 54-60.
[7]	Davies, A. An introduction to applied linguistics: From practice to theory, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2007, 23-34.
[8]	Donato, R. Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In: J. P. Lantolf and G. Appel. (eds.), Vygostskian approaches to second language research. Ablex Publishing Corporation, N.J. 1994, 33-56.
[9]	Ehrich, J. F. Vygotskian inner speech and the reading process. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 6(3).12-25. Jun.2006.
[10]	Ellis, R. Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 6(3) .193-220. Jun.2000.
[11]	Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. Second language acquisition, Taylor & Francis, Routledge, Oxon, 2008, 30-34.
[12]	Gillette, B. The role of learner goals in L2 success: Sociocultural theory and children with special needs. In:J.P. Lantolf & G. Appel. (eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1994, 195-210.
[13]	Lantolf, J. P . Sociocultural theory and second language learning, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000, 34-35.
[14]	Lantolf, J. P. & Thorne, S. L Socio-cultural theory and the genesis of second language development, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006, 23-24.
[15]	Lantolf, J.P.Socio-cultural theory and second language development:State-of-the-art [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 54 ( 28). 67-109. Dce. 2006.
[16]	Lantolf, P. J. Sociocultural Theory: A unified approach to L2 learning and teaching .In J. Cummins & C. Davison.(eds.), International handbook of English language teaching, Springer Science Business Media, LLC, NY, 2007, 693-701.
[17]	Lauria,A.R. The making of mind. A personal account of Soviet psychology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA,1979,45-50.
[18]	Liwei. Thought and language, Beijing University Press, Beijing, 2010, 10-11.
[19]	Mitchell, R. Myles, F. Second language learning theories, Arnold, London, 2004, 4-6.
[20]	Parks, S. Same task, different activities: Issues of investment, identity and use of strategy. TESL Canada Journal, 17(2). 64-89. Feb.2000.
[21]	Ratner, C. Cultural psychology:theory and method, Kluwer/Plenum, New York, 2002,67-73.
[22]	Roebuch,R. Reading and recall in L1 and L2: a sociocultural approach, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Stamford, 1998,55-60.
[23]	Skinner, B.F. Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1957, 24-30.
[24]	Swain,M. The output hypothesis and beyond: mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In Lantolf,J.P.(ED). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000, 97-114.
[25]	Wen,W. Activity theory and second language acquisition. Sino-US English Teaching, 5(5), May 2008.[Online]. Available:http://www.linguist.org.cn/doc/su200805/su20080504.pdf.(accessed ).
[26]	Vygotsky, L. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1978, 56-58.
[27]	Vygotsky, L.S.. Problems of general psychology, In R. Reiber & A. Carton (Eds.) The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, Plenum Press, New York, 1987, 2.