Addressing Pedagogical Training Needs of Teaching Staff: Lessons from Makerere University Short Professional Development Programs 2006 - 2010

Betty Akullu Ezati^1, , Charles Opolot-Okurut¹ and Proscovia Namubiru Ssentamu²

¹Makerere University

²Uganda Management Institute

Cite this paper:
Betty Akullu Ezati, Charles Opolot-Okurut and Proscovia Namubiru Ssentamu. Addressing Pedagogical Training Needs of Teaching Staff: Lessons from Makerere University Short Professional Development Programs 2006 - 2010. American Journal of Educational Research. 2014; 2(12):1190-1198. doi: 10.12691/education-2-12-9

Abstract

In Uganda, university teachers are recruited on the strength of their class of degree rather than pedagogical content knowledge and skill. Given the frequent changes in technology with resultant paradigm shifts from teacher to learner-centered education and competence-based approaches, increasing demand of accountability from society, and demand for quality, among others, university teaching can no longer be left to subject expertise alone. Effective teaching and quality graduates requires university teachers to possess a combination of content and pedagogical knowledge. Using data collected through an interview guide and end-of-workshop evaluation questionnaire for a four-year training period (2006 – 2010), this article focused on the lessons learnt from a series of pedagogical training workshops offered by Makerere University management to her teaching staff. Findings show that the main training needs among the teaching staff include assessment and grading of students, managing large classes, and using ICT in teaching and learning. Overall, the staff appreciated the workshop methodology, the co-teaching approach and the sharing of experiences. However, there were concerns about the timing of the trainings and inability to implement what is learned due to institutional constraints. The study underpins the importance of undertaking needs assessment before designing any staff training program. Rather than claim that addressing individual training needs will improve quality, staff pedagogical training should be combined with institutional changes so that institutional constraints that hinder utilization of knowledge and skills acquired during training are concurrently addressed. In addition, training approaches should transcend the deficit model of continuous professional development commonly used to the use of a variety of models including the cascaded model. Through the cascade model the capacity of academic staff could be built, these would continue to learn from each other, thereby developing a critical mass at faculty or academic unit level.

Keywords:
pedagogical content knowledge pedagogical training needs university teaching teachers continuous professional development models

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Armstrong, M., A handbook of human resource management practice, (10th ed.), Kogan Page, London 2006.
[2]	Brent, R. R., Recognizing that everyone in the institution is a teacher. Pursuing excellence in higher education. Eight fundamental challenges Jossey-Bass San Francisco, 2004.
[3]	Briggs, S., “Changing roles and competencies of academics” in Active Learning in Higher Education The Higher Education Academy and SAGE Publications (London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi) Vol. 6(3): 256–268, 2005.
[4]	Briggs, S. & Tang, C., Teaching for Quality Learning at University 4th Edition; Society for Research into Higher Education, 2014.
[5]	Bryman, A., Social Research Methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
[6]	Cahn, S. M., Scholars who teach. The art of college teaching. Chicago: Nelson- Hall, 1978.
[7]	Cowan, J., On becoming an innovative teacher: reflection in action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1998.
[8]	Davis, M., Barriers to reflective practice: The changing nature of higher education Active Learning in Higher Education 4(243) SAGE 6(3), 256-268, 2003.
[9]	Delvin-Scherer, R. & Sardone, N. B., “Collaboration as a Form of Professional Development: Improving Learning for Faculty and Students”. College Teaching Vol. 61 (Issue 1), 2013, pages 30 – 37.
[10]	Du Plessis, J. & Muzaffar. I., Professional Learning Communities in the Teachers’ College A Resource for Teacher Educators USAID Educational Quality Improvement Program 1 (EQUIP1), 2010.
[11]	Driel Van J. H. & Berry A.,“Teacher Professional Development Focusing on Pedagogical Content Knowledge” Educational Researcher, 2012, Available at http://edr.sagepub.com/content/41/1/26 Retrieved on 21/10/2014.
[12]	Eraut, M., Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence. London: Falmer Press, 1994.
[13]	Freire, P., Pedagogy of the oppressed. NY: Herder & Herder, 1975.
[14]	Haycock, K., ”Good Teaching matters a lot: How well qualified teachers can close the gap”, Thinking K16 Vol. 3 (Issue 2), 1998. The Education Trust.
[15]	Healey, M., “Developing the scholarship of teaching in higher education: a discipline-based approach”, Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 169-189, July 1, 2000.
[16]	Hoekstra, A. and Korthagen, F., “Teacher learning in a context of educational change: Informal learning versus systematically supported learning” Journal of Teacher Education, 61(76), 2011.
[17]	Hughes, P., “Teachers on Society, Teachers Professional Development”, Journal of Learning Disabilities 37 (3) 248-55, 1991.
[18]	Kasozi, A.B. K., African universities’ capacity to participate in global higher education supply and production, 2003, Unpublished Manuscript.
[19]	Kasozi, A.B. K., Musisi, N., Katunguka, S. & Asimwe, D., Decentralization and tertiary institutions of learning in Uganda, Report to the Rockefeller Foundation, 2002.
[20]	Kennedy, A., “Models of Continuing Professional Development: a framework for analysis”, Journal of In-service Education, Volume 31, Number 2, 2005.
[21]	Knowles, M., The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy, 2nd ed. Chicago: Follett 1980.
[22]	Koring, B., Das Theorie-Praxis-Verhältnis in Erziehungswissenschaft und Bildungstheorie. In: J. Petersen & G. O. Reinert Bildung und Erziehung Donauwörth: Auer, 1997.
[23]	Makerere University, ICT Policy/Master Plan (2010 - 2014), Makerere University printer, Kampala (2010).
[24]	Makerere University, Report of the Teaching and Learning Subcommittee of Senate, Makerere University printer, Kampala, 2010.
[25]	Makerere University, Quality assurance policy framework, Makerere University printer, Kampala (2007).
[26]	Makerere University, Strategic Plan 2008/09 -2018/19 Makerere University printer, Kampala.
[27]	Makerere University Planning and Development, Unit cost per faculty at Makerere University: A study to analyze the consequences of expansion in terms of cost of developing and maintaining academic standards. Makerere University printer, Kampala, 2003.
[28]	Makerere University, Report of the Quality Assurance Task Force, Makerere University printer, Kampala, 2006.
[29]	Mamdani, M., Scholars in the marketplace. Dilemmas of neo-liberal reform at Makerere (1989 -2005). Kampala: Fountain Publishers, 2007.
[30]	McCrickerd, J., “Understanding and Reducing Faculty Reluctance to Improve Teaching,” College Teaching, Vol. 60, Issue 2, pages 6-64, 2012.
[31]	Merriam, S.B, Qualitative research and case study applications in education, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1998.
[32]	Middleton, S., Educating feminist: Life history study, In S. Acker, (Ed). Teachers, Gender and Career, New York: Falmer Press, 1989.
[33]	Mohamedbhai, G., “Massification in higher education institutions in Africa: Causes, consequences, and responses,” in International Journal of African Higher Education, Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 59-83, 2014.
[34]	Monk, M., In Service for Teacher Development in Sub-Saharan Africa - A Review of Literature Published between 1983-1997 - Education Research Paper No. 30, 64 p. Department for International Development, 1997.
[35]	Namubiru, S. P., “Opportunities and threats to learning: lessons from a pedagogical workshop for faculty at a higher education institution,” in Journal of Education and Training Studies, Vol. 2, No. 1.
[36]	Namubiru, S. P., The Theory-Practice Discourse in Initial Teacher Education: Perspectives, Problems and Opportunities, a published PhD Thesis of Bayreuth University, Bayreuth African Studies, Germany, 2006.
[37]	New Vision Daily Newspaper, Do the best students always make good lecturers. The Education Vision, February 23rd 2008.
[38]	Pew, S., Andragogy and pedagogy as foundation theory for student motivation in higher education, Student Motivation 19 (3) 250-273, 2007
[39]	Reynolds. J., Caley, L., & Mason, R. How do people learn? London: CIPD. 2002.
[40]	Rhodes, C. & Beneicke, S., Professional Development Support for Poorly Performing Teachers: challenges and opportunities for school managers in addressing teacher learning needs, Journal of In-service Education, 29, pp. 123-140, 2003.
[41]	Rogers, C.R. Freedom to learn. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill, 1983.
[42]	Schön, D.A., The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith, 1983.
[43]	Seidman, I., Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press, 1998.
[44]	Shulman, L.S., Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Education review 57. 1-22, 1987.
[45]	Sparks, D., How to use this e-news letter, Transforming Professional learning 1, 1-2
[46]	Strike, A. K., Is Teaching a Profession: How Would We Know? In: R. L. Schwab (Ed.): Research-Based Teacher Evaluation: A Special Issue of the Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education. Vol. 4, No. 1, Bolton: Kluver Academic Publishers, 91-117, 1990
[47]	Tizard, J., Minty, I., & Derek, N., Meeting the staff development challenges presented by creating a University. Active Learning in Higher Education, 2(164) SAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, 2001.
[48]	The University of East Africa Development Plan, (1967/70).
[49]	Truscott, D., Swars, S., Smith, S., Thornton-Reid, F., Zhao, Y., Dooley, C., Williams, B., Hart, L., & Mathews, M., A cross-disciplinary examination of the prevalence of mixed methods in educational research: 1995-2005. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(4): 317-328, 2009, Retrieved 4 November, 2013 from http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/section?content=a913708351&fulltext=713240928.
[50]	Vavrus, F. Thomas, M., and Bartlett, L., Ensuring quality by attending to inquiry: Learner-centered pedagogy in sub-Saharan Africa Fundamentals of Teacher Education Development for UNESCO-IICBA, 2011.