American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2024, 12(12), 527-531
DOI: 10.12691/education-12-12-5
Open AccessArticle

Teaching and Researching Complex Cognitive Thinking Skills and Social Skills: A Constructivist Lens

Nancy Maynes1, and Nipissing University2

1Nipissing University

2Jennifer M. Straub, Wilfred Laurier University

Pub. Date: December 29, 2024

Cite this paper:
Nancy Maynes and Nipissing University. Teaching and Researching Complex Cognitive Thinking Skills and Social Skills: A Constructivist Lens. American Journal of Educational Research. 2024; 12(12):527-531. doi: 10.12691/education-12-12-5

Abstract

Research into constructivist approaches to learning from a qualitative perspective can be difficult because of the tendency to try to measure learning or economic outcomes. Qualitative studies use more individualized approaches to research that are sensitive to nuance and perspectives. However, qualitative researchers need to think carefully about what they are considering when they examine situations through a constructivist lens. Opinions and perspectives may not represent the rich possibilities that more focused studies can provide. This paper outlines a readily adaptable, flexible way to examine a broad range of topics in public school educational contexts to ensure deep learning is examined using topic elaboration in the context of emerging social skills deconstructed to get rich data in a variety of learning and research contexts. The paper outlines how constructivist approaches can be used to ensure greater trustworthiness when exploring the ways that complex skills and social interaction are taught within school contexts.

Keywords:
Constructivist research methodologies complex thinking skills social skills work habits

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Kellerman, J. (1996). The Web. Ballantine Books/ Random House.
 
[2]  Peterson, C., Park, N., Pole, N., D’Andrea, W., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2016).
 
[3]  Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2012). The miniature guide to critical thinking: Concepts and tools.
 
[4]  Pallinscar, A S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345-375.
 
[5]  Tekkumru-Kise, M. & Stein, M. K. (2015). A framework for analyzing cognitive demand and content-practices integration: Task analysis guide in Science, JRST, 52(5), 659-685.
 
[6]  Unlu, S. (2018). Curriculum development study for teacher education supporting critical thinking. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 18(76), 165-185.
 
[7]  Brooks, B. A., Floyd, F., Robins, D. L., & Chan, W. Y. (2015). Extracurricular activities and the development of social skills in children with intellectual and specific learning disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 59(7), 678–687.
 
[8]  Wong, C., Odom, S. L., Hume, K. A., Cox, A. W., Fettig, A., Kucharczyk, S., . . . Schultz,
 
[9]  Powell K. C., & Kalina C. J. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 130, 241-250.
 
[10]  Armbruster, P., Patel, M., Johnson, E., & Weiss, M. (2017). Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology. CBE: Life Sciences Education, 8(3).
 
[11]  Maynes, N. (1990). An exploratory study of the self-directed learner. [unpublished EdD dissertation, OISE, University of Toronto].
 
[12]  Maynes, N., & Scott, J. (2011). Modeling in the classroom: What approaches are effective to improve students’ writing? in education, 17(1), 14-28.
 
[13]  Zimmerman, B. J. & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
 
[14]  Mezerow, J. 2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspective on theory in progress. Jossey- Bass.
 
[15]  Slavitch, G., & Zimbardo, P. (2012), Transformational teaching: Theoretical underpinnings, basic principles, and core values, Educational Psychological Review, 569-606.
 
[16]  Taylor, E, & Cranton, P. (2012). The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Jossey-Bass.
 
[17]  Hawkins, R. (1991). Is social validity what we are interested in? Argument for a functional approach. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 205-213.
 
[18]  Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328-375). Macmillan.
 
[19]  Demaray, M., Ruffalo, S., Carlson, J., Busse, R., Olson, A., McManus, S., & Leventhal, A. (1995). Social skills assessment: A comparative evaluation of six published rating scales. School Psychology Review, 24, 648-671.
 
[20]  Gresham, F. M. (1983). Social validity in the assessment of children's social skills: Establishing standards for social competency. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1, 297-307.
 
[21]  Gresham, F. M. (1986). Conceptual issues in the assessment of social competence in children. In P. Strain, M. Guralnick, & H. Walker (Eds.), Children's social behavior: Development, assessment and modification (pp. 143-179). Academic Press.
 
[22]  Gresham, F. M. (1998). Social skills training with children. In T. S. Watson & F.M.
 
[23]  Gresham (Eds.), Handbook of child behavior therapy (pp. 475-497). Plenum Press.
 
[24]  Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S.N. (1990). Social skills rating system. American Guidance.
 
[25]  Newcomb, A., Bukowski, W., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children's peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average children. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99-128.
 
[26]  Walker, H., & McConnell, S. (1995). Walker-McConnell scale of social competence and school adjustment. Singular Press.
 
[27]  Tellier, M. (2022). The Impact of Online Learning on the Responsibility Skills of
 
[28]  Schunk, D. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review, 1(3), 173–208.
 
[29]  Staddon, John E. R., & Niv, Y. (2008), Scholarpedia, 3(9):2318 http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Operant_conditioning
 
[30]  ATLASti (n. d.). Conceptual Framework. https:// atlasti.com/guides/qualitative-research-guide-part-1/conceptual-framework
 
[31]  Growing Success (2010). Ontario Ministry of Education. https://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/policyfunding/growsuccess.pdf
 
[32]  School Mental Health Ontario (n.d.), https://smho-smso.ca/
 
[33]  Vygotsky, L., & Cole, M. Trans (1978). Mind in Society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
 
[34]  Vygotsky, L., & Cole, M, Trans. (1986). Thought and language. MIT Press.