Teachers’ Preparedness on Pedagogical Practices in K-12 Science Education: Foundations for Crafting an Effective Science Program

Wilfredo B. Baniqued^{1, 2,} and Romiro G. Bautista³

¹Graduate School, University of La Salette, Inc., Santiago City, Philippines

²College of Engineering, Quirino State University, Cabarroguis, Quirino, Philippines

³International Relations Department, Quirino State University, Diffun, Quirino, Philippines

Cite this paper:
Wilfredo B. Baniqued and Romiro G. Bautista. Teachers’ Preparedness on Pedagogical Practices in K-12 Science Education: Foundations for Crafting an Effective Science Program. American Journal of Educational Research. 2024; 12(8):291-297. doi: 10.12691/education-12-8-1

Abstract

This study investigates the implications and future works to bolster the preparedness of teachers to pedagogical practices in science teaching. Using a descriptive survey, data were collected from a diverse sample of science teachers to assess their readiness in implementing contemporary pedagogical techniques. The results indicate a sub-optimal level of preparedness among respondents, highlighting significant gaps in their pedagogical practices. The findings suggest a critical need for targeted professional development programs to enhance teachers' skills in modern pedagogical techniques, technology integration, and updated scientific knowledge. Revisions in teacher education curricula, emphasizing practical training and hands-on experiences, are essential to address these gaps. Longitudinal research studies are recommended to monitor the impact of the improved practices on student outcomes and to identify specific barriers faced by the teacher-respondents in science. Additionally, mentorship and collaboration initiatives, along with the integration of educational technology tools, are proposed to support teachers in optimizing their practices. The results draw implications along impacting student learning outcomes, teacher confidence, and retention. Enhancing pedagogical preparedness can bridge achievement gaps, promote educational equity, and lead to policies mandating ongoing professional development. This, in turn, contributes to global competitiveness in STEM fields that fosters a scientifically literate society. Addressing these gaps is crucial for the holistic development of students, teachers, and the broader educational system.

Keywords:
Effective Science Program K-12 Curriculum Science Pedagogical Practices science teaching

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2016). Inquiry-based science instruction—What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474-496.
[2]	Guerreo, JS., & Bautista, RG. (2023). Inquiry-based teaching in secondary science. International Journal ofSocial Sciences and Humanities, 8(2), 146-154.
[3]	Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 600-620). Routledge.
[4]	Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
[5]	Lin, X., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Lan, Y.-J. (2019). Using Inquiry-Based Learning to Enhance Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(5), 566-589.
[6]	Anoling, KM., Abella, CRG., Cagatao, PPS., & Bautista, RG. (2024). Critical Perspectives, Theoretical Foundations, Practical Teaching, Technology Integration, Assessment and Feedback, and Hands-on Practices in Science Education.” American Journal of Educational Research, vol. 12, no. 1 (2024): 20-27.
[7]	Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252-275.
[8]	Adinda, Arlin, Husniyyah., Erman, Erman., Tarzan, Purnomo., Mohammad, Budiyanto. (2023). Scientific Literacy Improvement Using Socio-Scientific Alegado, E. T. (2017). Culturally responsive teaching: A Philippine perspective. Journal of Southeast Asian Education, 18(1), 1-12.
[9]	Stevenson, R. B. (2016). Sense of place in the practice and assessment of place-based science teaching. Science Education, 95(6), 1042-1057.
[10]	Luft, J. A., Roehrig, G. H., & Patterson, N. C. (2014). Getting to the heart of science teacher professional development: A focus on the relationship between science teachers and their professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(1), 51-73.
[11]	National Research Council. (2013). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
[12]	Scalise, K., Timms, M., Moorjani, A., Clark, L., Holtermann, K., & Irvin, P. S. (2017). Student learning in science simulations: Design features that promote learning gains. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(9), 1050-1078.
[13]	Fabiola, Talavera-Mendoza. (2023). Science and inquiry-based teaching and learning: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education.
[14]	Wang, J., Shen, J., Huang, C., Wu, S., & Mao, C. (2017). Science curriculum reform in China: Perspectives from the literature. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 187-206.
[15]	Yerushalmy, M. (2017). Professional development of science teachers: Analysis of the literature and practical recommendations. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 133-166.
[16]	Lusterio-Rico, A. J. D., Gange, A. C., & Fortunado, A. L. (2016). Science laboratory facilities and resources in Philippine high schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 693(1), 012043.
[17]	Aviso, K. B., & Manzano, R. P. (2018). Engaging high school students through inquiry-based science education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1049(1), 012084.
[18]	Francisco, P. F., & Amparo, C. A. (2020). Culturally relevant pedagogy in science education: A perspective from the Philippines. International Journal of Science Education, 42(4), 553-570.
[19]	Rosel, L. L., Valdez, R. A., Bautista, A. S., & Dimaano, N. S. (2019). Assessment practices in science education: An exploration in Philippine schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1407(1), 012006.
[20]	Sonia C. Pagbilao, Pauline Anne Therese M. Pfeifer, Sherly C. Cainguitan, Felimendo M. Felipe, Madelyn L. Macalling, Cheryl R. Ramiro, Hermenegildo F. Samoy, Jr, and Romiro G. Bautista, “Building a Community of Practice in a Sustained Culture of Lesson Study: The Case of Saguday, Philippines.” American Journal of Educational Research, vol. 11, no. 12 (2023): 783-791.
[21]	Romiro G. Bautista, Hermenegildo F. Samoy, Jr., Dakila Carlo E. Cua, Cynthia R. Indunan, & Karen Grace N. Celestino. (2023). LESSON STUDY AND ITS IMPACT ON PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF QUIRINO PROVINCE, PHILIPPINES. International Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities (IJSSH), 8(2), 73–86. Retrieved from http:// ijssh.ielas.org/ index.php/ijssh/article/view/69
[22]	Magdalena U. Aquino, and Romiro G. Bautista, “Impact of Lesson Study Practice on the Teaching Practices of Teachers in a Schools District of Quirino, Philippines.” American Journal of Educational Research vol. 11, no. 11 (2023): 746-751.
[23]	Taber, K. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273-1296.
[24]	Nadelson, L. S., & Seifert, A. (2017). Teacher beliefs and practices about NGSS aligned instruction: A case study of a middle school science teacher. Science Educator, 25(2), 126-139.
[25]	Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education. Horizon Research, Inc.
[26]	Lee, O., & Buxton, C. A. (2017). Diversity and equity in science education: Theory, research, and practice. Multicultural Education Series. Teachers College Press.
[27]	Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. (2013). Two views about explicitly teaching nature of science. Science & Education, 22(9), 2109-2139.
[28]	Reyes, M. (2015). Proficiency level of teachers in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Education, 94(2), 1-22.
[29]	Discipulo, LG., & Bautista, RG. (2022). Students’ cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies towards hands-on science. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(2), 658-664.
[30]	Ligado, FNG., Guray, ND., & Bautista, RG. (2022). Pedagogical Beliefs, Techniques, and Practices towards Hands-on Science.” American Journal of Educational Research, vol. 10, no. 10, 584-591.
[31]	Tadem, T. E. (2019). Educational governance and policy in the Philippines: A critical discourse. Journal of Philippine Policy Studies, 23(1), 4-25.
[32]	Michael C. Bagay, Robie Rose R. Ursua, May Ann A. Abellera, Roselyn Joyce G. Baldovino, Rose Ann P. Concepcion, Vilma S. Galapon, and Romiro G. Bautista, “Problem-based Learning in Teaching Science.” Journal of Innovations in Teaching and Learning, vol. 3, no. 1 (2023): 7-14.