Challenges, Coping Mechanisms, Motivation, and Support Needs for Out-of-Field Science Teachers in Western Mindanao

Daril Jane B. Edulan¹ and Maria Teresa M. Fajardo^2,

¹School of Teacher Education, JH Cerilles State College, Zamboanga del Sur, Philippines

²Depeartment of Science Education, University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines

Cite this paper:
Daril Jane B. Edulan and Maria Teresa M. Fajardo. Challenges, Coping Mechanisms, Motivation, and Support Needs for Out-of-Field Science Teachers in Western Mindanao. American Journal of Educational Research. 2024; 12(7):271-281. doi: 10.12691/education-12-7-8

Abstract

Science education holds significant importance in helping students make sense of the world and develop critical scientific inquiry skills. This study aims to investigate the experiences of out-of-field teachers teaching high school science subjects in Western Mindanao, specifically exploring their challenges, motivation, coping mechanisms, and support needs. By understanding these factors, strategies and interventions can be developed to improve the teaching practices and performances of out-of-field teachers, ultimately enhancing science education in the Philippines. This study employed a qualitative research design, specifically, descriptive-phenomenological approach. Results revealed that the challenges non-science teachers encounter when teaching science courses range from a lack of resources and training to challenges regarding confidence and teaching efficacy. The coping mechanisms employed by non-science teachers demonstrate their resourcefulness and flexibility in handling difficulties related to teaching scientific subjects. By highlighting the reciprocal relationship between teacher motivation and student success and highlighting the significance of fostering professional development, nurturing passion, and creating supportive learning environments in science education, intrinsic rewards helped non-science teachers overcome challenges to teach science.

Keywords:
non-science teachers science education Philippine-education phenomenology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Wöbmann L, and Hanushek E., “The Role of Education Quality in Economic Growth: The Role of School Improvement in Economic Development,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2007, 4122:1-94, Available: http://econ.worldbank.org.
[2]	Idris, F., Hassan, Z., Ya’acob, A., Gill, S.K. and Awal, N.A.M., “The role of education in shaping youth's national identity,” in Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, pp.443-450. Oct 2012.
[3]	McGivney, E, and Winthrop, R., “Education’s impact on economic growth and productivity,” Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, July. Jul 2016.
[4]	OECD, "An OECD Learning Framework 2030," in The Future of Education and Labor, 23-35, 2019.
[5]	Astakhova, K.V., Korobeev, A.I., Prokhorova, V.V., Kolupaev, A.A., Vorotnoy, M.V. and Kucheryavaya, E.R., “The role of education in economic and social development of the country,” International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(1S), 2016. Available: http:www.econjournals.com.
[6]	Fuente, J.A.D., “Driving Forces of Students’ Choice in specializing science: a science education context in the Philippines Perspective,” The Normal Lights, 13(2), Dec 22, 2019.
[7]	Acido, J.V. and Caballes, D.G., “Assessing educational progress: A comparative analysis of PISA results (2018 vs. 2022) and HDI correlation in the Philippines,” World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), pp.462-474. 2024.
[8]	SEI-DOST and UP NISMED, “Science framework for philippine basic education,” SEI-DOST & UP NISMED, Manila, 2011.
[9]	Pinto, T. and Teixeira, A.A., “The impact of research output on economic growth by fields of science: a dynamic panel data analysis, 1980–2016,” Scientometrics, 123(2), pp.945-978, May 2020.
[10]	OECD, “PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education,” PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2023.
[11]	Yoo, J.H., “The effect of professional development on teacher efficacy and teachers’ self-analysis of their efficacy change,” Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(1), pp.84-94, June 2016.
[12]	UNESCO, “Global Report on Teachers,” United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France, 2024, Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000388832.
[13]	Kilag, O.K.T., Zarco, J.P., Zamora, M.B., Caballero, J.D., Yntig, C.A.L., Suba-an, J.D. and Sasan, J.M.V., “How Does Philippines's Education System Compared to Finland's?,” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION IN NONFORMAL EDUCATION, 3(6), pp.11-20. June 2023. Available: http:// inovatus.es/ index.php/ejine/article/view/1769.
[14]	PBED, “State of Philippine Education Report 2023,” Philippines Business for Education, 2023. Available: Inc.https:// www.pbed.ph/blogs/47/PBEd/State%20of%20Philippine%20Education%20Report%202023.
[15]	Abaño, G.A.O., MAN, R., Balanga, G.J., Inghug, D.C., Orbeta, M., MPM, J.T.A., Collander, E. and RPsyc, J.R.B., “An educator’s odyssey: a phenomenological analysis of the lived experience of out-of-field teachers,” Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, 32(3), 2021.
[16]	Caldis, S., “Transitioning into the profession with an out-of-field teaching load,” in Out-of-field teaching across teaching disciplines and contexts, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 261-283, February 2022.
[17]	Creswell, J.W. and Poth, C.N., Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications, December 2016.
[18]	Edwards, R. and Holland, J., “What is qualitative interviewing?” Bloomsbury Academic, 2013, 128. Available: https:// library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/58752/1/9781849668026. pdf.
[19]	Bevan, M.T., “A method of phenomenological interviewing” Qualitative Health Research, 24(1), pp.136-144, January 2014.
[20]	Lambert, S.D. and Loiselle, C.G., “Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness,” Journal of advanced nursing, 62(2), pp.228-237, April 2008.
[21]	Krueger, R.A., “Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research,” Sage publications, August 2014.
[22]	Sundler, A.J., Lindberg, E., Nilsson, C. and Palmér, L., “Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology,” Nursing Open, 6(3), pp.733-739, July 2019.
[23]	OECD, “Education at a Glance 2020: OECD Indicators,” OECD Publishing, 2020.
[24]	UNESCO, “Global Education Monitoring Report 2021/2: Non-state actors in education: Who chooses? Who loses?,” UNESCO Publishing, 2021.
[25]	World Bank, “World Development Report 2022: The Role of Teachers in Transforming Education,” World Bank Publications, 2022.
[26]	Brown, A., and Jones, B., “Financial Constraints and Educational Resource Access: A Case Study,” Journal of Educational Research, 55(3), 321-335, 2021.
[27]	National Center for Education Statistics, “Condition of Education 2019,” U.S. Department of Education, 2019.
[28]	Pew Research Center, “Educational Funding Survey: Personal Financial Contributions in Schools,” 2020.
[29]	Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., and Gardner, M., “Effective Teacher Professional Development,” Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. Available: https:// learningpolicyinstitute.org/ product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report.
[30]	Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Malzahn, K. A., Plumley, C. L., Gordon, E. M., and Hayes, M. L., “Report of the 2018 NSSME+: Status of K-12 Science and Mathematics Education in the United States,” Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc. Available: https://www.horizon-research.com/2018-nssme/research/.
[31]	Nakhleh, M. B., “Why Some Chemistry Teachers Struggle: Challenges and Professional Development Needs,” Journal of Chemical Education, 96(2), 215-224, 2019.
[32]	National Research Council, “Science Teachers' Learning: Enhancing Opportunities, Creating Supportive Contexts,” The National Academies Press, 2021.
[33]	Bandura, A., Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company, 2021.
[34]	Woolfolk Hoy, A., and Spero, R. B., “Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures,” Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 343-356, 2005.
[35]	Amasha, H., Al-Emran, M., Muliawan, R., and Kwak, D., “Teachers' use of YouTube for professional development: A systematic review,” Computers & Education, 170, 104249, 2021.
[36]	Aguirre, J., and Mertz, K., “Supporting the learning of all students in chemistry: Developing and scaling high-leverage practices,” Journal of Chemical Education, 96(5), 1043-1048, 2019.
[37]	Aguirre, J., and Mertz, J., “Exploring teacher motivation: A mixed-methods study,” Educational Researcher, 48(5), 293-311, 2019.
[38]	Thompson, E. “YouTube as an educational tool: A review of its effectiveness in enhancing student learning,” Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 234-249, 2021.
[39]	Smith, E.K. and Kaya, E. Online university teaching at the time of COVID-19 (2020): An Australian perspective. IAFOR Journal of Education. 2021.
[40]	Johnson, R. T. Beginning Teachers' Technology Integration Self-Efficacy Based on Level of Technology Infusion in the Undergraduate Program. 2020
[41]	Smith, J., and Johnson, P., “Professional Development and Its Impact on Teacher Effectiveness in Science Education,” Education and Science, 45(4), 512-529, 2020.
[42]	Smith, A., and Johnson, B., “Teacher-student relationships and academic achievement: A meta-analysis,” Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 267-299, 2020.
[43]	Huang, C., and Hsu, L., “Impact of professional development on teacher efficacy and teaching practices: A longitudinal study,” Journal of Education and Learning, 8(4), 1-15, 2019.
[44]	Smith, J., and Lewis, P., “Professional development and teacher enthusiasm: Renewing the passion for teaching,” Educational Research Review, 33, 1-11, 2021.
[45]	Varela, D. G., and Fedynich, L. V., “Innovation in the classroom: Exploring the impact of technology on student engagement,” Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(3), 337-353, 2020.
[46]	Johnson, S., & Card, K., “The power of feedback: How teacher reflection and student input drive professional growth. Journal of Teacher Education, 73(2), 150-167, 2022.
[47]	Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 61, 101860. 2020.
[48]	Kang, J., & Kim, J. Exploring the predictiveness of curiosity and interest in science learning in and after class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2023.
[49]	Guo, Q., Samsudin, S., Yang, X., Gao, J., Ramlan, M. A., Abdullah, B., & Farizan, N. H. Relationship between perceived teacher support and student engagement in physical education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(7), 6039. 2023.
[50]	Klassen, R. M., and Tze, V. M. C., “Teachers' self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis,” Educational Research Review, 12, 59-76, 2019.
[51]	Day, C., and Gu, Q., “Resilient teachers, resilient schools: Building and sustaining quality in testing times,” Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(1), 65-82, 2020.
[52]	Lee, J., and Chen, Y., “The impact of laboratory equipment on student achievement in science education,” Journal of Educational Research, 114(3), 345-359, 2021.
[53]	Desimone, L. M., and Garet, M. S., “Best practices in teachers' professional development in the United States,” Psychology, Society, & Education, 12(1), 1-11, 2020.
[54]	Jones, M., & McLean, K. Personalising learning in teacher education. Springer. 2018.
[55]	Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. Best practicies in teachers' professional evelopment in the United States. Psychology, Scoeity and Educaiton, 7(3), 252–263. 2015.
[56]	Han, S., and Weiss, S., “The impact of mentorship on new teacher retention and development: A literature review,” Journal of Education and Learning, 9(1), 54-63, 2020.
[57]	Wang, J., and Odell, S. J., “Supporting beginning teachers: The role of mentor teachers,” Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103405, 2021.
[58]	Zhang, G., and Liu, J., "Equitable distribution of technical assistance and support in educational settings," Educational Research Review, 56(6), 805-823, 2022.
[59]	Brooks, J., and King, N., “Professional development and teacher enthusiasm: Renewing the passion for teaching,” Educational Research Review, 33, 1-11, 2021.