Active Learning in the Japanese Efl University Classroom

Christian Burrows^1,

¹Department of Social System Design, Hiroshima Prefectural University, Hiroshima City, Japan

Cite this paper:
Christian Burrows. Active Learning in the Japanese Efl University Classroom. American Journal of Educational Research. 2023; 11(12):802-809. doi: 10.12691/education-11-12-4

Abstract

The educational goal of Hiroshima Prefectural University (henceforth, HU) states that first-year EFL students are to achieve CEFR level B2 (the English level of the majority of students was CEFR B1 at the beginning of the semester) upon completion of a three-month intensive English program (henceforth, IEP). Through an active learning instructional approach students are expected to develop the requisite language skills in addition to a set of key competencies fostered through the cooperative learning environment. The aim of the program is for students to improve their language proficiency in preparation for all-English content classes commencing in the subsequent semester. Active learning is defined by HU as a learner-focused approach in which core elements of collaborative, cooperative, and problem-based learning are developed. Adoption of the approach signifies a transition away from traditional knowledge transmission-based to teaching that more actively engages students in the learning process leading to more long-lasting, meaningful learning [61]. However, analysis of results from post testing show only moderate improvement in mean test scores as measured on the TOEFL ibt test. This paper critically examines expectations of the program, both in terms of language improvement and also for evidence of the effectiveness of active learning among Japanese EFL learners

Keywords:
active learning independent learning speaking proficiency

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
[2]	MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, 2018, June). Eigo kyouiku jisshi jyoukyou chousa (English translation: Survey on the implementation of English education). https://www.mext.go.jp/amenu/ kokusai/ gaikokugo/1415043.htm.
[3]	Aoki, M. (2017, April 6). Japan’s latest English-proficiency scores disappoint. The Japan Times. https://www.japantimes.co.jp.
[4]	Educational Testing Service. (2019). Report on test takers. TOEIC listening and reading test. https://www.ets.org.
[5]	Clare, B. (2007). Promoting deep learning: A teaching, learning and assessment endeavour. Social Work Education, 26(5), 433-46.
[6]	MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, 2013, June). Dai-ni kyouiku shinkou kihon keikaku (English translation: The second basic plan for the promotion of education). https://www.mext.go.jp/en/policy/education/lawandplan/title01/detail01/1373896.htm.
[7]	Sunaga, K. (2010). Several understandings and practical tasks of active learning: Focusing on the concept “activeness”. Journal of Kansai University Higher Education Research, 1, 1–11.
[8]	Brown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to pedagogy. Prentice Hall.
[9]	Willis, D., & Willis, J. (1996). Challenge and change in language teaching. Macmillan.
[10]	Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching & learning. Heinle, Cengage Learning.
[11]	University Educational Guidelines (2021). https://www.eikei.ac.jp/english/academics/curriculum/.
[12]	Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED336049.
[13]	Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. The American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19.
[14]	Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
[15]	Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Jossey-Bass.
[16]	Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs. Traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64.
[17]	Ruhl, K., Hughes, C. & Schloss, P. (1987) Using the pause procedure to enhance lecture recall. Teacher Education and Special Education, 10, 14-18.
[18]	Elmetaher, H. (2021). Developing English listening skills: Can active learning help? Japan MEXTESOL Journal, 3, 45-49.
[19]	Kusumoto, Y. (2018). Enhancing critical thinking through active learning. Language Learning in Higher Education, 8(1), 45-63.
[20]	Habib, M. (2021). Mechatronics: Experiential learning and the stimulation of thinking skills Education Sciences, 11, 46.
[21]	Yamada, H. (2021). An Implementation of project-based learning in an EFL context: Japanese students' and teachers' perceptions regarding team learning. TESOL Journal, 12(2).
[22]	Elam, J. R. (2018). Fostering intercultural competence through problem-based learning: A case study of a socioculturally modified curriculum in Japanese higher education. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5031.
[23]	Woodward, H. & Warrick A. (2020). Implementing online discussion forums based on principled approaches. In K.-M. Frederiksen, S. Larsen, L. Bradley & S. Thouësny (Eds), CALL for widening participation: short papers from EUROCALL 2020 (347-352). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED611133.pdf.
[24]	Ismailov, M. (2021). Virtual exchanges in an inquiry-based learning environment: Effects on intra-cultural awareness and intercultural communicative competence. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1-30.
[25]	Reid, J., & Gilardi, F. (2016). Transmedia teaching framework: from group projects to curriculum development. In C. Goria, O. Speicher, & S. Stollhans (Eds), Innovative language teaching and learning at university: enhancing participation and collaboration, 79-84. Dublin: Research-publishing. net.
[26]	Wood, D. J. (2014). Using still images for written English Communication. Journal of Chikushijogakuen University, 25-41.
[27]	Roy, D. (2017). Task-based EFL language teaching with procedural information design in a technical writing context. Cogent Education, 4-1.
[28]	Peraza, A. & Furumura, Y. (2022). Project-based learning to Develop Intercultural.
[29]	Matsuda, A. (2003). The ownership of English in Japanese secondary schools. World Englishes, 22(4), 483-496.
[30]	Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. Prentice Hall Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Longman
[31]	Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.
[32]	Burden, P. (2002). A cross sectional study of attitudes and manifestations of apathy. The Language Teacher, 26(3), 3-10.
[33]	Rausch, A. (2000). Improvement in English education from a learning perspective [Online version]. The Language Teacher, 24(6).
[34]	Dam, L. & Little, D. (1999). Autonomy in foreign language learning: From classroom practice to generalizable theory. In A. Barfield et al. (eds), Japan Association for Language Teaching 1998 Proceedings, 127–136.
[35]	Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford University Press.
[36]	Cutrone, P. (2009). Overcoming Japanese EFL learners’ fear of speaking. University of Reading’s Language Studies Working Papers, 1(1), 55-63.
[37]	Guilford J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
[38]	Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14-26.
[39]	Iwai, C. (2004). Instructional effects of communication strategies. Proceedings of JALT 2003, 162-174.
[40]	Corrales, O., & Call, M. E. (1989). At a loss of words: The use of communicative strategies to convey lexical meaning. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 227-240.
[41]	Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
[42]	Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(3), 301-320.
[43]	Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage Publications.
[44]	Kenna, P., & Lacy, S. (1994). Business Japan: A practical guide to understanding Japanese business culture. Passport Book.
[45]	Townsend, J., & Danling, F. (1998). Quiet students across cultures and Continents. English Education, 31(1), 4-25.
[46]	Harumi, S. (2001). Japanese learners of English and their use of silence. https: //eastasianleamer.org/JLarchive/Best_of contents/papers/23pdf.
[47]	Dwyer, E., & Heller-Murphy, A. (1996). Japanese learners in speaking classes. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 7, 46-55.
[48]	Matsumoto, M., & Boye Lafayette, D. (2000). Japanese nuance in plain English. Kodansha.
[49]	Nakamichi, T. (2000). Cross-cultural communication breakdown: Japanese students' pragmatic failure in Canada. JABAET, 4, 15-42.
[50]	Andersen, P. (1988). Explaining intercultural differences in nonverbal communication. In L. A. Samovar & R. E. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader, 229-239.
[51]	Ishii, S., & Bruneau, T. (1994). Silence and silences in cross-cultural perspective: Japan and the United States. In L. A. Samovar & R. E. Porter (eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader, 246-251.
[52]	Koreo, K. (1988). Language habits of the Japanese. English Today, 15, 19-25.
[53]	Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Anchor Books.
[54]	Burrows, C. (2009). The shyness myth. ESL Magazine, 68, 22-26.
[55]	Poyatos, F. (2002). Nonverbal communication across disciplines (vol. 2.).
[56]	Ross, S. (1998). Divergent frame interpretations in oral proficiency interview interaction. In R. Young & A.W. He (Eds.) Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency, 333-353, John Benjamins.
[57]	Meisel, J. M. (1983). Transfer as a second-language strategy. Language & Communication, 3(1), 11–46.
[58]	Cutrone, P. (2010). Helping Japanese ESL/EFL learners overcome difficulties in intercultural communication. Journal of the Faculty of Global Communications, University of Nagasaki, 11, 11-22. http://reposit.sun.ac.jp/dspace/handle/10561/661.
[59]	Burrows, C. (2008). An evaluation of task-based learning (TBL) in the Japanese Classroom. English Today, 24(4), 11-16.
[60]	Yamada, H. (2015). Yappari, as I thought: Listener talk in Japanese communication. Global Advances in Business and Communication Conference & Journal, 4(1). https://commons.emich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=gabc.
[61]	Elwood, K. (2001). Getting along with the Japanese. Ask Publishing.
[62]	Kagawa, H. (1997). The inscrutable Japanese. Kodansha.
[63]	Duff, P. (1986). Another look at inter-language talk: Taking task to task. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn, 147-181. Newbury House.
[64]	Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA in Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287-318). Cambridge University Press.
[65]	McVeigh, B. J. (2001). Higher education, apathy, and post-meritocracy. The Language Teacher, 25(10), 29-32.
[66]	Foss, K. & Reitzel, A. C (1988). A Relational model for managing second language anxiety Tesol Quarterly, 22(3), 437-454.
[67]	Drake, J. R. (2012). A critical analysis of active learning and an alternative pedagogical framework for introductory information systems courses. Journal of Information Technology Education, 39-52.
[68]	Seedhouse, P. (1999) Task-based interaction. ELT Journal 53(3), 149-156.
[69]	Crookes, G., & Schmidt, R. W. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41, 469-512.