American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2023, 11(11), 752-760
DOI: 10.12691/education-11-11-4
Open AccessArticle

Research on Vocational College Students’ Perceived Blended ESP Learning Based on Gender and Prior Experiences

Jianyun Xiao1,

1Cabin Attendant Department, Shanghai Civil Aviation College, Shanghai, China

Pub. Date: November 07, 2023

Cite this paper:
Jianyun Xiao. Research on Vocational College Students’ Perceived Blended ESP Learning Based on Gender and Prior Experiences. American Journal of Educational Research. 2023; 11(11):752-760. doi: 10.12691/education-11-11-4

Abstract

With blended learning (BL) approach becoming increasingly popular in course delivery of tertiary education in China, it remains a significant research area to investigate learners’ experiences and feelings to improve teaching quality. This study aims to develop an effective BL model for a first-year compulsory ESP (English for Special purpose) course. After investigating 361 cabin service and security majors including 157 males and 204 females, it also examines students’ perceptions and opinions of the application of blended mode in the course. A questionnaire of three parts was developed as the research instrument. The results revealed that most learners had positive perceptions toward the blended learning approach, and variables such as gender and prior experiences with BL were correlated with students’ perceptions. Female students had more favorable feedback of BL than males, and having prior experiences was not a significant factor in students’ perceived learning effectiveness, but learners with BL experiences show better perceptions with respect to perceived usefulness, learning autonomy and overall satisfaction. The study presents pedagogical implications for improving and polishing the course in the BL environment in the future, and in particular provides instructional directions of fine-tuning of teaching when students’ gender and prior BL experiences are taken into consideration.

Keywords:
Blended Learning learner perceptions gender differences prior BL experiences

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  C. Chapelle, English Language Learning and Technology, Lectures on Applied Linguistics in the Age of Information and Communication Technology, vol. 7, 2003.
 
[2]  N. Wang, J. Chen, M. Tai, and J. Zhang, “Blended learning for Chinese university EFL learners: learning environment and learner perceptions,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, no.3, 1-27, 2009.
 
[3]  R. Graham, "Emerging practice and research in blended learning," Handbook of distance education, vol. 3, 333-350, 2013.
 
[4]  M. Oliver and K. Trigwell, “Can ‘Blended Learning’ be redeemed?” ELearning and Digital Media, 2, no.1, 17–26, 2005.
 
[5]  P. L. Smith and C. L. Dillon, “Comparing distance learning and classroom learning: Conceptual considerations,” The American Journal of Distance Education, 13 (2).6-23, 1999.
 
[6]  S.Y.Yoon and C. H. Lee, “The perspectives and effectiveness of blended learning in L2 writing of Korean university students,” Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 13(2).177–204, 2010.
 
[7]  L.Z. He, “Requirements for College English Teaching in the New Era – “Guiding Principles and Key Points of Guidelines for College English Teaching,” Foreign Language World, no. 04. 13-18, 2020.
 
[8]  A. Norberg, C. D. Dziuban, and P. D. Moskal, “A time-based blended learning model,” On the Horizon, 19(3). 207–216, 2011.
 
[9]  H. S. Wu and S.J.Luo, “Integrating MOOCs in an Undergraduate English Course: Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions of Blended Learning,” SAGE Open, 12 (2). 2022.
 
[10]  R. Zhang. “Blended Course Evaluation in the Context of English for Specific Purposes: Accountability and Development”, Sage Open,10 (29). 1-15, 2021.
 
[11]  X.Y. Feng, Y.W.Sun, J.T. Cao, “Hybrid learning in the era of ‘Internet plus’: learning fundamentals of theory and pedagogy,” Distance Education in China, no.2.7-16+92, 2019.
 
[12]  M.C. Bueno-Alastuey and M.V. López Pérez, “Evaluation of a blended learning language course: students’ perceptions of appropriateness for the development of skills and language areas,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, no.6, 2014.
 
[13]  R. Ayres, “Learner Attitudes Towards the Use of CALL,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15 (3). 241-249.
 
[14]  A. Strambi, “Learners' perceptions of a web-enhanced learning environment: insights from a longitudinal study,” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. series s, no.18. 81-96, 2004.
 
[15]  S. Al-Fadhli, “Students' Perceptions of E-Learning in Arab Society: Kuwait University as a Case Study, E-Learning and Digital Media, 5(4).418-428, 2008.
 
[16]  J. S. Ch. Hsieh, W-Chi V. Wu and M. W. Marek, “Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2).1-21, 2017.
 
[17]  F. Bouilheres, Le Thi Viet Ha Le, S. McDonald, and L.J.-Montera, “Defining student learning experience through blended learning,” Education and Information Technologies, 25(4). 3049-3069, 2020.
 
[18]  C. Zhu, “University student satisfaction and perceived effectiveness of a blended learning course,” International Journal of Learning Technology., 12(1).66-83, 2017.
 
[19]  J. S. Yan and M. S. Yan, “Perceptions and Practices of Blended Learning in Foreign Language teaching at USIM,” European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 12(1). 170-176, 2018.
 
[20]  C. Deng, J. Peng & S. F. Li, “Research on the state of blended learning among college students – A mixed-method approach,” Frontiers in Psychology, 13.1-13, 2022.
 
[21]  V. Savara and S. Parahoo, “Unraveling determinants of quality in blended learning: are there gender-based differences?,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35(9).2035-2051, 2018.
 
[22]  J. Wongwuttiwat, V. Buraphadeja, and T. Tantontrakul, “A case study of blended e-learning in Thailand,” Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(2). 197-214, 2020.
 
[23]  Z.H. Cai, X.T. Fan, and J.X. Du, “Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis,” Computers & Education, 105(1). 1–13, 2017.
 
[24]  M. H. Vo, Z. Chang, A. N. Diep, “Students’ performance in blended learning: disciplinary difference and instructional design factors,” J. Comput. Educ. 7(4). 487-510, 2020.
 
[25]  N. Rajeh Alsalhi, “Blended Learning in Higher Education: A Study of Its Impact on Students’ Performance”, Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., 16(14). 249–268, Jul. 2021.
 
[26]  X. W. Song, “Investigation and analysis of gender differences in college students’ online autonomous learning,” Educ. Teach. Forum, no.2. 172–173, 2014.
 
[27]  A. Koohang, “Students’ perceptions toward the use of the digital library in weekly web-based distance learning assignments portion of a hybrid programme,” British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5). 617-626, 2004.
 
[28]  Naaj, M. A., Nachouki, M., & Ankit, “A. Evaluating student satisfaction with blended learning in a gender-segregated environment,” Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 11(1).185-200, 2012.
 
[29]  W. Zhang and C. Zhu, “Blended Learning as a Good Practice in ESL Courses Compared to F2F Learning and Online Learning,” International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), 12(1), 2020.
 
[30]  J.-barlow, E. M. and Lehnen, Carl, “A scoping review of the application of systematic instructional design models by academic librarians,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5), 2021.
 
[31]  X.Y. Feng and R.X. Wang, “The core goal-oriented Blended learning design model in the "Internet plus" era,” Distance Education in China, no. 07. 19-26+92-93, 2019.
 
[32]  A. Rianto, “Blended Learning Application in Higher Education: EFL Learners’ Perceptions, Problems, and Suggestions,” Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(1). 55-68, 2020.
 
[33]  R. Owston and D. N. York, “The nagging question when designing blended courses: Does the proportion of time devoted to online activities matter?,” The Internet and Higher Education, 36(1) . 22–32, 2018.
 
[34]  S. Vanslambrouck, “Students' motivation and subjective task value of participating in online and blended learning environments,” The Internet and Higher Education, 32(1). 33-40, 2018.
 
[35]  M. W. Barbosa, “Students’ perceptions of an extensive blended learning implementation: the effects of instructional design and interaction,” Interactive Learning Environments. 1-20, 2022.
 
[36]  H. Hu and Z. Du, “Web-based inquiry of autonomy in foreign language learning as an English major in higher vocational college,” Advanced Technology in Teaching, 163. 45-48, 2013.
 
[37]  L. Ma & C. S. Lee, “Investigating the adoption of MOOCs: a technology–user–environment perspective,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(1). 89-98, 2019.
 
[38]  Y. Dang, Y. Zhang, S. Ravindran, T. Osmonbekov, “Examining student satisfaction and gender differences in technology-supported, blended learning”, Journal of Information Systems Education, 27(2).119-130, 2016.
 
[39]  C. L. Zhang and L. J. Li, “An empirical study on improving the students’ online self-regulated learning in MOOC-based blended teaching,” Modern Distance Educ. 45–52, 2018.
 
[40]  A. Koutropoulos, M. S. Gallagher, S. C. Abajian, I. De Waard, R. J. Hogue, N. O. Keskin and C. O. Rodriguez, “Emotive vocabulary in MOOCs: Context & participant retention,” European Journal of Open, Distance and E‐Learning, 15(1). 1-23, 2012.