Integrating Design Thinking into Interdisciplinary Course with STEM-based Robotic Game <Frontier Guards>

Hsin-Yin Huang^1, and Ju-Ling Shih²

¹Department of Information and Learning Technology, National University of Tainan, Taiwan

²Graduate Institute of Network Learning Technology, National Central University, Taiwan

Cite this paper:
Hsin-Yin Huang and Ju-Ling Shih. Integrating Design Thinking into Interdisciplinary Course with STEM-based Robotic Game <Frontier Guards>. American Journal of Educational Research. 2022; 10(10):599-611. doi: 10.12691/education-10-10-3

Abstract

This study introduces an interdisciplinary course for STEM-based robotic game <Frontier Guards> integrating with the design thinking (DT) model and evaluates the effectiveness of students’ DT and STEM abilities. Students learned to design, assemble, test, and remodify their robotics by using the concept of DT, as well as learned to collaborate with team members. A room-size floor map was used to build the game scenario depicting an aboriginal region in Taiwan with terrains and obstacles on the routes for reliving a short piece of Tayal history. Students were assigned to role-play the two parties of frontier guards and learn the history, assess the confrontational situations, design and construct robotics, and iterate during the game sessions. Thirteen 6th-grade students were divided into two parties to design defensive fortifications and fighting vehicles that can be remotely controlled by using block programming for attacking, defending, and snatching the opponent’s objects and winning the game, as were fourteen 5th graders. This study investigated how DT facilitated the achievement of instructional goals by using learning sheets, DT and STEM questionnaires, and interviews. Discussions and reflections during the creation process and the strategic decisions in the game were observed to analyze students’ improvements in problem-solving skills. The result of the study can be proved that using the interdisciplinary robotic game with DT can enhance students' learning motivation, engagement, DT skills, and STEM performances, as well as problem-solving skills.

Keywords:
design thinking STEM game-based learning robotics interdisciplinary course

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Ulibarri, N., et al., Research as design: Developing creative confidence in doctoral students through design thinking. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 2014. 9: p. 249-270.
[2]	Stiftung, S., Design Thinking in STEM”: Education project combining STEM education, design-based education and the challenges addressed by the SDGs. Sustainable Development Goals Partnership Platform. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment. un. org/partnership, 2019.
[3]	Carroll, M., et al., Destination, imagination and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 2010. 29(1): p. 37-53.
[4]	Watson, A.D.J.A.E., Design thinking for life. 2015. 68(3): p. 12-18.
[5]	Lin, C.-H., et al. Game-Based Learning Effectiveness and Motivation Study between Competitive and Cooperative Modes. in 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT). 2017. IEEE.
[6]	Brown, T. and B. Katz, Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Vol. 20091. 2019: HarperBusiness New York, NY.
[7]	Gasparini, A. and D. Chasanidou. Understanding the role of design thinking methods and tools in innovation process. in ISPIM Conference Proceedings. 2016. The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM).
[8]	Afari, E. and M. Khine, Robotics as an educational tool: Impact of lego mindstorms. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 2017. 7(6): p. 437-442.
[9]	Breiner, J.M., et al., What Is STEM? A Discussion About Conceptions of STEM in Education and Partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 2012. 112(1): p. 3-11.
[10]	Honey, M., G. Pearson, and H. Schweingruber, STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Vol. 500. 2014: National Academies Press Washington, DC.
[11]	Li, Y., et al., Design and design thinking in STEM education. 2019, Springer.
[12]	Kelley, T.R. and J.G. Knowles, A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM education, 2016. 3(1): p. 1-11.
[13]	Wright, N. and C. Wrigley, Broadening design-led education horizons: Conceptual insights and future research directions. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2019. 29(1): p. 1-23.
[14]	McFadden, J. and G. Roehrig, Engineering design in the elementary science classroom: Supporting student discourse during an engineering design challenge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2019. 29(2): p. 231-262.
[15]	English, L.D., Learning while designing in a fourth-grade integrated STEM problem. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2019. 29(5): p. 1011-1032.
[16]	Group, E.C.S.W., Early STEM matters: Providing high-quality STEM experiences for all young learners. Chicago (IL): UChicago STEM Education and Erikson Institute, 2017.
[17]	Barak, M. and M. Assal, Robotics and STEM learning: Students’ achievements in assignments according to the P3 Task Taxonomy—practice, problem solving, and projects. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2018. 28(1): p. 121-144.
[18]	Bermúdez, A., et al., Drone challenge: A platform for promoting programming and robotics skills in K-12 education. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2019. 16(1): p. 1729881418820425.
[19]	Alimisis, D.J.T.i.S. and T. Education, Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges. 2013. 6(1): p. 63-71.
[20]	Balogh, R. Basic activities with the Boe-Bot mobile robot. in Proceedings of conference DidInfo. 2008.
[21]	Chetty, J. Lego© mindstorms: Merely a toy or a powerful pedagogical tool for learning computer programming? in ACSC. 2015.
[22]	Eguchi, A.J.R. and A. Systems, RoboCupJunior for promoting STEM education, 21st century skills, and technological advancement through robotics competition. 2016. 75: p. 692-699.
[23]	Park, J., et al., Learning to be better at the game: Performance vs. completion contingent reward for game-based learning. Computers & Education, 2019. 139: p. 1-15.
[24]	Hainey, T., et al., A systematic literature review of games-based learning empirical evidence in primary education. Computers & Education, 2016. 102: p. 202-223.
[25]	Apostolellis, P., et al. RaBit EscAPE: a board game for computational thinking. in Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children. 2014. ACM.
[26]	Curzon, P., et al., Developing computational thinking in the classroom: a framework. 2014.
[27]	Perrotta, C., et al., Game-based learning: Latest evidence and future directions. 2013.
[28]	Gee, J.P., What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 2003. 1(1): p. 20-20.
[29]	Dichev, C. and D.J.I.j.o.e.t.i.h.e. Dicheva, Gamifying education: what is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: a critical review. 2017. 14(1): p. 1-36.
[30]	Leonard, J., et al., Using robotics and game design to enhance children’s self-efficacy, STEM attitudes, and computational thinking skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2016. 25(6): p. 860-876.
[31]	Thanyaphongphat, J., et al. A game-based learning approach on robotics visualization for loops in programming concepts. in 2020 Joint International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology with ECTI Northern Section Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering (ECTI DAMT & NCON). 2020. IEEE.
[32]	Parsons, S. and E. Sklar. Teaching AI using LEGO mindstorms. in AAAI Spring Symposium. 2004.
[33]	Fagin, B.S., L.D. Merkle, and T.W. Eggers, Teaching computer science with robotics using Ada/Mindstorms 2.0. ACM SIGAda Ada Letters, 2001. 21(4): p. 73-78.
[34]	Altin, H. and M.J.J.o.b.s.e. Pedaste, Learning approaches to applying robotics in science education. 2013. 12(3): p. 365.
[35]	Williams, D., et al., A preliminary study exploring the use of fictional narrative in robotics activities. 2010. 29(1): p. 51-71.
[36]	Brown, T., Design thinking. Harvard business review, 2008. 86(6): p. 84.
[37]	Lor, R., Design thinking in education: A critical review of literature. 2017.
[38]	Lin, L., et al., From knowledge and skills to digital works: An application of design thinking in the information technology course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2020. 36: p. 100646.
[39]	Noel, L.-A., T.L.J.D. Liub, and T. Education, Using design thinking to create a new education paradigm for elementary level children for higher student engagement and success. 2017. 22(1): p. n1.
[40]	Rauth, I., et al. Design thinking: An educational model towards creative confidence. in DS 66-2: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on design creativity (ICDC 2010). 2010.
[41]	Dam, R. and T. Siang, What is design thinking and why is it so popular. Interaction Design Foundation, 2018: p. 1-6.
[42]	Grammenos, D. and M. Antona, Future designers: Introducing creativity, design thinking & design to children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2018. 16: p. 16-24.
[43]	Melles, G., et al., Problem finding through design thinking in education, in Inquiry-based learning for multidisciplinary programs: a conceptual and practical resource for educators. 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
[44]	Hatzigianni, M., et al., Young children’s design thinking skills in makerspaces. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2021. 27: p. 100216.
[45]	Panke, S.J.O.E.S., Design thinking in education: Perspectives, opportunities and challenges. 2019. 1(1): p. 281-306.
[46]	Eguchi, A. Robotics as a learning tool for educational transformation. in Proceeding of 4th international workshop teaching robotics, teaching with robotics & 5th international conference robotics in education Padova (Italy). 2014.
[47]	Huang, P.-C. STEM-based Computational Thinking Course with Design Thinking Method: A Collaborative Project of Automated Container Terminal (ACT). 2020.
[48]	Lou, S.J., et al. A study on the changes of attitude toward STEM among senior high school girl students in Taiwan. in 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2009.
[49]	Unfried, A., et al., The development and validation of a measure of student attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and math (S-STEM). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2015. 33(7): p. 622-639.
[50]	Dreessen, K. and S.J.I.J.o.C.-C.I. Schepers, Foregrounding backstage activities for engaging children in a FabLab for STEM education. 2019. 20: p. 35-42.
[51]	Plass, J.L., B.D. Homer, and C.K.J.E.P. Kinzer, Foundations of game-based learning. 2015. 50(4): p. 258-283.
[52]	Economics, D.A., Australia’s STEM workforce: A survey of employers. 2014, Office of the Chief Scientist Canberra, ACT, Australia.
[53]	Koh, J.H.L., et al., Design thinking for education: Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning. 2015.
[54]	Scheer, A., et al., Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. 2012. 17(3).
[55]	Hatzigianni, M., et al., Young children’s design thinking skills in makerspaces. 2021. 27: p. 100216.