American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2022, 10(4), 212-222
DOI: 10.12691/education-10-4-9
Open AccessArticle

School-level Teacher Reward Practices and Quality of Students’ Academic Achievement in Secondary Schools in Masaka District, Uganda

Francis Xavier Lubega1, , Gyaviira Musoke Genza2 and Jessica Norah Aguti3

1School of Education, College of Education and External Studies, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062 Kampala, Uganda

2Department of Foundations and Curriculum Studies, School of Education, College of Education and External Studies, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062 Kampala, Uganda

3Faculty of Science & Education, Busitema University, P.O. Box 236 Tororo, Uganda

Pub. Date: April 15, 2022

Cite this paper:
Francis Xavier Lubega, Gyaviira Musoke Genza and Jessica Norah Aguti. School-level Teacher Reward Practices and Quality of Students’ Academic Achievement in Secondary Schools in Masaka District, Uganda. American Journal of Educational Research. 2022; 10(4):212-222. doi: 10.12691/education-10-4-9

Abstract

The difficulty of finding an appropriate teacher reward system which can sustainably promote quality education prompted the study from which this article arises. This article focuses on two objectives: i) to examine the relationship between prevalent school-level teacher reward practices and students’ academic performance and ii) to examine the relationship between prevalent school-level teacher reward practices and teachers’ ratings of students’ academic performance. Hinged on the philosophical paradigm of pragmatism, the study was conducted in 23 secondary schools through a cross-sectional concurrent mixed methods research design, over a sample of 368 participants, using stratified random and purposive sampling. Data collected using questionnaires, interviews and documentary review was analysed using themes, frequency distribution, and Chi-square test of independence. The study discovered that the practices of involving teachers in reward-related decision making and espousing performance-based reward programs as well as making effort to achieve attractive salaries promise to support teacher-facilitated learning. It was then concluded that improved remuneration mainly in form of higher and more prompt salaries as well as greater participation of teachers especially in the management of school-level reward-for-performance schemes can more effectively promote quality teaching leading to students’ gains in learning achievement. It was therefore recommended that reward managers at school level should cherish practices which, on the one hand, enable teachers to receive competitive and more prompt remuneration and, on the other hand, attach special value to teachers’ direct or representative participation in major decision making at least concerning merit-based rewards.

Keywords:
teachers students reward practices teacher motivation academic achievement performance

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  OECD, Building a high-quality teaching profession: Lessons from around the world, 2011. www.oecd.org/publishing.
 
[2]  TIF, A teacher incentive framework for Uganda. 2017. http://www.radixconsults.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/A-TEACHER-INCENTIVE-FRAMEWORK-IN-UGANDA.pdf.
 
[3]  UNESCO, Teacher motivation and learning outcomes, 2021. https://learningportal.iiep.unesco.org/en/issue-briefs/improve-learning/teachers-and-pedagogy/teacher-motivation-and-learning-outcomes.
 
[4]  Greene, P., Teacher merit pay is a bad idea: Policies and practices from the classroom perspective. 2019. https://www.forbes.com/sites/petergreene/2019/02/09/teacher-merit-pay-is-a-bad-idea/?sh=45dd2a424ffb.
 
[5]  Shifrer, D., Turley, R.L. and Heard, H, “Do teacher financial awards improve teacher retention and student achievement in an urban disadvantaged school district?”, American Educational Research Journal, 54(6). 1117-1153. 2017.
 
[6]  University-of-California, “Teacher incentive programs can improve student achievement: Programs that combine group and individual rewards can have good results and be cost-effective”, in Science Daily. University of California – Riverside, 2019. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/07/190723104114.htm.
 
[7]  World-Bank, World development report 2018: Learning to realize education's promise. Open Knowledge at World Bank, 2018. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/28340.
 
[8]  Pugatch, T. and Schroeder, E, “Teacher pay and student performance: Evidence from the Gambian hardship allowance”, Journal of Development Effectiveness, 10(2). 249-276. 2018.
 
[9]  Tavares, P. and Ponczek, V, “Teacher pay and student performance: Evidence from brazil”, Brazilian Review of Econometrics, 38(2). 197-219. 2018.
 
[10]  UN Transforming our World: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. 2015. www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/.
 
[11]  UNICEF, Defining quality in education. 2000, United Nations Children’s Fund, New York. https://www.unicef.org/education.
 
[12]  Eren, O., “Teacher incentives and student achievement: Evidence from an advancement program”, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2019. 38(4): p. 867-890.
 
[13]  Santibañez, L., Teacher incentives (Chapter 31), in The Economics of education: A comprehensive overview. 2020. p. 431-441.
 
[14]  Weldon, T. Does merit pay for teachers have merit? Pros and cons of new models for teacher compensation. 2011. https://knowledgecenter.csg.org/kc/system/files/Does_Merit_Pay_For_Teachers_Have_Merit__0.pdf.
 
[15]  Armstrong, M. and Taylor, S, Armstrong's handbook of human resource management practice, 15th ed., Kogan Page, London, 2020.
 
[16]  Department-of-Education, History of teacher pay changes. 1995: CPRE Finance Briefs.
 
[17]  Chang, F., et al., “The impact of pay-for-percentile incentive on low-achieving students in rural China”, Economics of Education Review, 75, 1-10. 2020.
 
[18]  Jacobson, S.L., “Monetary incentives and the reform of teacher compensation: A persistent organizational dilemma”, International Journal of Educational Reform, 4(1), 29-35. 1995.
 
[19]  Murnane, R.J., Economic incentives to improve teaching, in Teachers in developing countries: Improving effectiveness and managing costs, J.P. Farrell, et al., Editors. Economic Development Institute, World Bank. 1993.
 
[20]  Pham, L.D., Nguyen, T.D. and Springer, M.G, “Teacher merit pay and student scores: A meta-analysis”, American Educational Research Journal, 58(3), 527-566. 2020.
 
[21]  Chiang, H., et al., Evaluation of the teacher incentive fund: Final report on implementation and impacts of pay-for-performance across four years. 2017. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee.
 
[22]  UNESCO Teacher salaries: A prerequisite for reform. 2020. http://www.iiep.unesco.org/en/teacher-salaries-prerequisite-reform-13479.
 
[23]  Armstrong, M., Armstrong’s handbook of reward management practice: Improving performance through reward. 5th ed. 2015a, London, England: Kogan Page Ltd.
 
[24]  Maslow, A.H., “A theory of human motivation”, Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396. 1943.
 
[25]  Vroom, V., Work and motivation, Wiley, New York, 1964.
 
[26]  Armstrong, M. and Brown, D, Armstrong's handbook of reward management practice: Improving performance through reward, 6th ed., Kogan Page, London, 2019.
 
[27]  Jones, G.R., George, J.M., and Hill, C.W.L, Contemporary management, 2nd ed., McGraw Hill Education, New York, 2000.
 
[28]  Lunenburg, F.C., “Expectancy theory of motivation: Motivating by altering expectations”, International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration, 15(1), 1-6. 2011.
 
[29]  Parijat, P. and Bagga, S, “Victor Vroom’s expectancy theory of motivation – An Evaluation”. International Research Journal of Business and Management, 7(9). 2014. www.irjbm.org.
 
[30]  Armstrong, M., Armstrong’s handbook of performance management: An evidence-based guide to delivering high performance. 5th ed. 2015b, London, England: Kogan Page Ltd.
 
[31]  ESSP, Education and sports sector strategic plan (2017/18 - 2019/20). 2017, Ministry of Education and Sports, Kampala.
 
[32]  Scheerens, J., Luyten, H. and van Ravens, J. eds. “Perspectives on educational quality: Illustrative outcomes on primary and secondary schooling in the Netherlands”, in SpringerBriefs, New York. 2011.
 
[33]  UNESCO Towards indicators for a post-2015 education framework. 2014. www.unesco.org.
 
[34]  Darling-Hammond, L. Teachers innovating for education transformation. 2022. https://teachertaskforce.org/blog/teachers-innovating-education-transformation.
 
[35]  Cunningham, J. Student Achievement Student Achievement. 2012. https://www.ncsl.org/documents/educ/CharterSchoolStudentAchievement.pdf.
 
[36]  Campbell, J.P. and Pritchard, R.D, Motivation theory in industrial and organizational psychology, in Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, M.D. Dunnette, Editor. Rand McNally, Chicago. 63-130. 1976.
 
[37]  Gay, L.R., Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application, 5th ed., Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey, 1996.
 
[38]  Fang, X., “Exploring effective measures for improving teacher leadership in junior high schools in china” International Journal of New Developments in Education, 3(1), 16-23, 2021.
 
[39]  San, S.M.H.S. and Ni, K.M, “Relationship between teachers’ empowerment and teachers’ professional commitment”, Journal of the Myanmar Academy of Arts and Science, 18(9), 179-193, 2020.
 
[40]  Chimaobi, I. and Chikamnele, M.J, “Employee participation in decision making and its impact on organizational performance: Evidence from government owned enterprises, Port Harcourt, Nigeria”, SSRN Electronic Journal, 27(18), 1-18, 2020.
 
[41]  Ike, P.R., Ezeh, L.N., and Etodike, C.E, “Employee participation in decision making: A correlate of employee citizenship behaviour and counterproductive workplace behavior”, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(7), 934-948, 2017.
 
[42]  Tournier, B., et al. Teacher career reforms: Learning from experience. 2019. http://www.iiep.unesco.org/en/teacher-career-reforms-learning-experience-13308.
 
[43]  Ruck, K., Welch, M., and Menara B, “Employee voice: An antecedent to organisational engagement?”. Public Relations Review, 43(5), 904-914, 2017.
 
[44]  Katkhede, V.R. Pillars of industrial democracy. 2018. https://www.kobo.com/us/en/ebook/pillars-of-industrial-democracy.
 
[45]  Gupta, N. and Shaw J.D, “Employee compensation: The neglected area of HRM research”, Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), 1-4, 2014.
 
[46]  Loyalka, P.K., et al., “Pay by Design: Teacher performance pay design and the distribution of student achievement’, Journal of Labor Economics, 37, 621-662, 2016.