Promotion of Human Milk Substitutes in the Opinion of Mothers of Young Children

Barbara Baranowska^{1, 2}, Antonina Doroszewska^3, , Dorota Sys⁴, Iwona Kiersnowska⁵, Agata Aleksandrowicz⁶, Urszula Bernatowicz-Łojko^{1, 7}, Michał Rabijewski⁴, Anna Kajdy⁴ and Aleksandra Wesołowska^{8, 7}

¹Department of Midwifery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland

²Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Didactics, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland

³Department of Medical Communication, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland

⁴Department of Reproductive Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland

⁵Department of Obstetrics and Perinatology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

⁶Foundation for the Promotion of Breastfeeding, Warsaw, Poland

⁷Human Milk Bank Foundation Warsaw, Poland

⁸Laboratory of Human Milk and Lactation Research at Regional Human Milk Bank in Holy Hospital, Medical University of Warsaw, Department of Neonatology, Warsaw, Poland, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland

Cite this paper:
Barbara Baranowska, Antonina Doroszewska, Dorota Sys, Iwona Kiersnowska, Agata Aleksandrowicz, Urszula Bernatowicz-Łojko, Michał Rabijewski, Anna Kajdy and Aleksandra Wesołowska. Promotion of Human Milk Substitutes in the Opinion of Mothers of Young Children. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research. 2020; 8(7):329-336. doi: 10.12691/jfnr-8-7-4

Abstract

Background. The International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes was established to reduce the detrimental effect of promotional activities of companies producing BMS on attitudes towards breastfeeding. Objective. The study was carried out to assess maternal opinions on promotional activities related to BMS in medical facilities, participation of medical staff in advising mothers to feed children with BMS, and other promotional activities related to those products. Design. This study was part of the Netcode survey. Data was collected via structured interviews and the results were analyzed with the use of descriptive statistics and Chi-Square Post-Hoc analysis using the program SPPS. Settings. Poland. Participants. Women caring for children age 0-36 months (N =380). Results. More than one third of the interviewed women (35%) declared that they were informed to give milk products other than human milk to children below 6 months of age (n=132). Among people recommending these types of products, women mostly indicated health care professionals. In health centers mothers were mainly exposed to brochures and have received free samples of BMS. Conclusions. The investigation has shown a substantial exposition of women to marketing of BMS, with significant involvement of medical professionals. Promoting BMS to mothers who can feed naturally, without providing them enough support to continue natural feeding is unethical. Measures should be implemented to better adhere to the Code.

Keywords:
breast-milk substitutes ethical aspect medical staff

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJD, França GVA, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. 2016; 387(10017): 475-90.
[2]	Rollins NC, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, Horton S, Lutter CK, Martines JC, et al. Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? The Lancet. 2016; 387(10017): 491-504.
[3]	Rothstein JD, Caulfield LE, Broaddus-Shea ET, Muschelli J, Gilman RH, Winch PJ. “The doctor said formula would help me”: Health sector influences on use of infant formula in peri-urban Lima, Peru. Soc Sci Med. 2020; 244: 112324.
[4]	International Baby Food Action Network. Breaking the Rules, Raport [Internet]. 2017. Available: https://worldnutritionjournal.org/index.php/wn/article/download/151/118/.
[5]	WHO & UNICEF. Innocenti Declaration. On the protection, promotion and support of breastfeeding [Internet]. 1991; Available: https://www.unicef.org/spanish/nutrition/index_24807.html.
[6]	WHO. World Health Assembly resolutions and documents [Internet]. Available: http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/wha_nutrition/en/.
[7]	WHO. Guidance on ending the inappropriate promotion of foods for infants and young children: implementation manual [Internet]. 2017. Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260137/9789241513470-eng.pdf?sequence=1
[8]	Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Walker N, Rizvi A, Campbell H, Rudan I, et al. Interventions to address deaths from childhood pneumonia and diarrhoea equitably: what works and at what cost? Lancet Lond Engl. 2013; 381(9875): 1417-29.
[9]	Mullany LC, Katz J, Li YM, Khatry SK, LeClerq SC, Darmstadt GL, et al. Breast-feeding patterns, time to initiation, and mortality risk among newborns in southern Nepal. J Nutr. 2008; 138(3): 599-603.
[10]	Garcia CR, Mullany LC, Rahmathullah L, Katz J, Thulasiraj RD, Sheeladevi S, et al. Breast-feeding initiation time and neonatal mortality risk among newborns in South India. J Perinatol Off J Calif Perinat Assoc. 2011; 31(6): 397-403.
[11]	Edmond KM, Zandoh C, Quigley MA, Amenga-Etego S, Owusu-Agyei S, Kirkwood BR. Delayed breastfeeding initiation increases risk of neonatal mortality. Pediatrics. 2006; 117(3): e380-e386.
[12]	Piwoz EG, Huffman SL. The impact of marketing of breast-milk substitutes on WHO-recommended breastfeeding practices. Food Nutr Bull. 2015; 36(4): 373-386.
[13]	Michaud-Létourneau I, Gayard M, Pelletier DL. Translating the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes into national measures in nine countries. Matern Child Nutr. 2019; 15(S2): e12730.
[14]	Bégin F, Lapping K, Clark D, Taqi I, Rudert C, Mathisen R, et al. Real-time evaluation can inform global and regional efforts to improve breastfeeding policies and programmes. Matern Child Nutr. 2019; 15(S2): e12774.
[15]	WHO & UNICEF. Protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding in facilities providing maternity and newborn services: the revised [Internet]. 2018. Available: https://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/bfhi-implementation/en/.
[16]	World Health Organization. Marketing of breast-milk substitutes: national implementation of the international code, status report 2020 [Internet]. 2020. Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332185/9789240006034-eng.pdf
[17]	Fundacja Promocji Karmienia Piersią. Terminologia i wspólne definicje. Prawo reklamy [Terminology and common definitions. Advertising law] [Internet]. 2018. Available:http://prawo.fpkp.pl/terminologia/.
[18]	Central Statistical Office in Poland. Social Surveys and Living Conditions Department. Health status of population in Poland in 2014 [Internet]. 2014. Available: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary- tematyczne/zdrowie/zdrowie/zdrowie-i-ochrona-zdrowia-w-2014-r-,1,5.html.
[19]	Adamska-Sala I, Baranowska B, Doroszewska A, Piekarek M, Pietrusiewicz J. Raport z monitoringu oddziałów położniczych. Opieka okołoporodowa w Polsce w świetle doświadczeń kobiet [Report on monitoring maternity wards. Perinatal care in Poland in the light of women's experiences]. Warszawa: Fundacja Rodzić po Ludzku; 2018.
[20]	Supreme Audit Office. Opieka okołoporodowa na oddziałach położniczych. [Perinatal care in obstetrics departments]. [Internet]. 2016. Available: https://www.nik.gov.pl/kontrole/P/15/065/.
[21]	Committee for Breastfeeding Promotion. Lista szpitali Przyjaznych Dziecku. [List of Baby-Friendly designated Hospitals]. [Internet]. 2019. Available: https://www.laktacja.pl/article/6,szpitale-przyjazne-dziecku.
[22]	Rozporządzenie Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 16 sierpnia 2018 r. w sprawie standardu organizacyjnego opieki okołoporodowej [Regulation of the Minister of Health of 16 August 2018 on the organizational standard of perinatal care]. Dz.U. Poz. 1756. 2018.
[23]	WHO. The International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes: Frequently Asked Questions [Internet]. 2017. Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/254911/WHO- NMH-NHD-17.1-eng.pdf?ua=1.
[24]	WHO. NetCode toolkit for ongoing monitoring and periodic assessment of the Code [Internet]. 2017. Available: http://www.who.int/nutrition/netcode/toolkit/en/.
[25]	IBM. SPSS Statistics for Windows [Computer Software]. 2010.
[26]	Brodribb WE. Ethics and the WHO “International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes”. Breastfeed Med. 2014; 9(3): 170-170.
[27]	Rios RE, Riquelme H, Beshlawy SE. Prescribing under the Influence: The Business of Breastmilk Substitutes. Soc. Sci. 2016, 5(4), 53.
[28]	Whelan B, Kearney JM. Breast-feeding support in Ireland: a qualitative study of health-care professionals’ and women’s views. Public Health Nutr. 2015; 18(12): 2274-82.
[29]	Pries AM, Huffman SL, Mengkheang K, Kroeun H, Champeny M, Roberts M, et al. Pervasive promotion of breastmilk substitutes in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, and high usage by mothers for infant and young child feeding. Matern Child Nutr. 2016; 12(S2): 38-51.
[30]	Hidayana I, Februhartanty J, Parady VA. Violations of the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes: Indonesia context. Public Health Nutr. 2017; 20(1): 165-73.
[31]	Odom EC, Li R, Scanlon KS, Perrine CG, Grummer-Strawn L. Association of family and health care provider opinion on infant feeding with mother’s breastfeeding decision. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014; 114(8): 1203-7.
[32]	Renfrew MJ, McCormick FM, Wade A, Quinn B, Dowswell T. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 5: CD001141.
[33]	Brockway M, Benzies K, Hayden KA. Interventions to Improve Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy and Resultant Breastfeeding Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Hum Lact Off J Int Lact Consult Assoc. 2017; 33(3): 486-99.
[34]	Nabulsi M, Tamim H, Shamsedine L, Charafeddine L, Yehya N, Kabakian-Khasholian T, et al. A multi-component intervention to support breastfeeding in Lebanon: A randomized clinical trial. PLoS ONE. 2019; 14(6).
[35]	Burcu K, Ilknur D, Remziye S, Seda ST. The Relation between Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy and Starting Times of Supplementary Food. 2018; 11(1): 231-8.
[36]	Tawfik S, Mostafa O, Salem M, Habib E, Saied D. Formula Feeding and Associated Factors among a Group of Egyptian Mothers. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(11): 1854-9.
[37]	Sobel HL, Iellamo A, Raya RR, Padilla AA, Olivé J-M, Nyunt-U S. Is unimpeded marketing for breast milk substitutes responsible for the decline in breastfeeding in the Philippines? An exploratory survey and focus group analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2011; 73(10): 1445-8.
[38]	Baker P, Smith J, Salmon L, Friel S, Kent G, Iellamo A, et al. Global trends and patterns of commercial milk-based formula sales: is an unprecedented infant and young child feeding transition underway? Public Health Nutr. 2016; 19: 2540-50.
[39]	Radzyminski S, Callister LC. Health Professionals’ Attitudes and Beliefs About Breastfeeding. J Perinat Educ. 2015; 24(2): 102-9.
[40]	Baranowska B, Malinowska M, Stanaszek E, Sys D, Bączek G, Doroszewska A, et al. Extended Breastfeeding in Poland: Knowledge of Health Care Providers and Attitudes on Breastfeeding Beyond Infancy. J Hum Lact Off J Int Lact Consult Assoc. 2019; 35(2): 371-80.
[41]	Sadacharan R, Grossman X, Matlak S, Merewood A. Hospital discharge bags and breastfeeding at 6 months: data from the infant feeding practices study II. J Hum Lact Off J Int Lact Consult Assoc. 2014; 30(1): 73-9.
[42]	Huang Y, Labiner-Wolfe J, Huang H, Choiniere CJ, Fein SB. Association of health profession and direct-to-consumer marketing with infant formula choice and switching. Birth Berkeley Calif. 2013;40(1): 24-31.
[43]	Waite WM, Christakis D. The Impact of Mailed Samples of Infant Formula on Breastfeeding Rates. Breastfeed Med Off J Acad Breastfeed Med. 2016; 11(1): 21-5.
[44]	Thomson G, Ebisch‐Burton K, Flacking R. Shame if you do - shame if you don’t: women’s experiences of infant feeding. Matern Child Nutr. 2015; 11(1): 33-46.
[45]	Benoit B, Goldberg L, Campbell-Yeo M. Infant feeding and maternal guilt: The application of a feminist phenomenological framework to guide clinician practices in breast feeding promotion. Midwifery. 2016; 34: 58-65.
[46]	Fahlquist JN. Experience of non-breastfeeding mothers: Norms and ethically responsible risk communication. Nurs Ethics. 2016; 23(2): 231-41.
[47]	Foss KA. Breastfeeding and Media. W: Foss KA, red. Breastfeeding and Media: Exploring Conflicting Discourses That Threaten Public Health. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. pp. 1-31.
[48]	Apple RD. Constructing Mothers: Scientific Motherhood in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Soc Hist Med. 1995; 8(2): 161-78.
[49]	Pérez-Escamilla R, Martinez JL, Segura-Pérez S. Impact of the Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative on breastfeeding and child health outcomes: a systematic review. Matern Child Nutr. 2016; 12(3): 402-17.
[50]	Cattaneo A, Pani P, Carletti C, Guidetti M, Mutti V, Guidetti C, et al. Advertisements of follow-on formula and their perception by pregnant women and mothers in Italy. Arch Dis Child. 2015; 100(4): 323-8.
[51]	WHO. Marketing of breast-milk substitutes: national implementation of the international code, status report [Internet]. 2018. Available: https://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/code_report2018/en/.
[52]	Chantry CA, Eglash A, Labbok M. ABM Position on Breastfeeding-Revised 2015. Breastfeed Med. 2015; 10(9): 407-11.
[53]	Vitell SJ, Singhapakdi A, Thomas J. Consumer ethics: an application and empirical testing of the Hunt‐Vitell theory of ethics. J Consum Mark. 200; 18(2): 153-78.