American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2018, 6(3), 281-287
DOI: 10.12691/education-6-3-16
Open AccessArticle

The Effects of DRA and DR-TA Methods on Students’ Reading Comprehension for State Islamic Senior High School

Abdullah Hasan1,

1State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia

Pub. Date: March 23, 2018

Cite this paper:
Abdullah Hasan. The Effects of DRA and DR-TA Methods on Students’ Reading Comprehension for State Islamic Senior High School. American Journal of Educational Research. 2018; 6(3):281-287. doi: 10.12691/education-6-3-16

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the comparison between the use of Directed Reading Activity (DRA) and Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DR-TA) methods on students’ reading comprehension. The research design was a quasi-experimental study by comparing two strategies of two experimental groups and one control group pretest - posttest design. It involved 94 participants that consisted of two experimental groups and one control group of the students of State Islamic Senior High School (MAN) Pekanbaru of Riau province. Three research questions and nine hypotheses were posed in this study in order to find out the significant difference between DRA and DR-TA methods on students’ reading comprehension. Pretest and posttest were administered in this study and independent sample t-test and paired sample t-test were used to analyze the data. The research finding showed that there was no significant difference of post-test mean scores between the experimental class 1 using DRA method and the experimental class 2 using DR-TA method on students’ reading comprehension. DRA method contributed the effect of improvement on students’ reading comprehension 76% while DR-TA contributed 72%, and on the other hand the control class contributed 49%. At last, it can make an inference that both DRA and DR-TA methods can be applied in teaching reading comprehension especially at State Islamic Senior High School Pekanbaru of Riau province, and generally in Senior high school level in Indonesia.

Keywords:
Directed Reading Activity (DRA) method Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DR-TA) method and Reading Comprehension

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Kirkpatrick and Sussex, English as an international language in Asia, 2012, p.79.
 
[2]  Torres, C Carrion. 1998. English as a Universal Language. Omniglot: the Online Encyclopedia of Writing Systems and Language.
 
[3]  Ellis, 1994, p.220. Learning to Learn English: A Course in Learner Training. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
[4]  Allan Lauder, 2008. The Status and Function of English in Indonesia: A Review of Key Factors. Makara, Sosial Humaniora, Vol 12, No. 1, Juli 2008: 9-20.
 
[5]  Celce, Marianne-Murcia, 2001. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, Third Edition, Boston: heinle & Heinle.
 
[6]  Hannell, Glyness 2008. Success with Inclusion. London and NY: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
 
[7]  Neil, Anderson, 2003. Reading in David Nunan, Practical English Language Teaching (1st ed.)p.68 Sydney: McGraw-Hill.
 
[8]  Gable, 2008. The role of two reading strategies in text comprehension: An eye fixation study in primary school children. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(2), 203-223.
 
[9]  Ness, M. 2011. Explicit Reading Comprehension Instruction in Elementary Classrooms: Teacher Use of Reading Comprehension Strategies. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 25(1), 98-117.
 
[10]  Nation, I. S. P, 2009 Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing. New York and London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
 
[11]  Moats in Westwood, Peter. (2008). What Teachers Need To Know About Reading And Writing Difficulties. Victoria: ACER Pres.
 
[12]  Crawford, Alan, Saul. E. Wendy, Samuel Mathews & James Maxinster. 2005. Teaching and Learning Strategies for the Thinking Classroom. The International Debate Education Association, New York NY 10019.
 
[13]  Stauffer, R. G. (1969). Directing reading maturity as a cognitive process. New York: Harper & Row.
 
[14]  Cohen, A.D. 1998. Strategies in Learning and Using as Second Language. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
 
[15]  Bryman, A. 2001. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 
[16]  Brumfit, Christopher J. and Keith Johnson, eds. 1983. The Communicative Approach to Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.
 
[17]  Gay, L. R., & Airisian, P. 2003. Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Application. 7th ed. New Jersey: Prentice hall.
 
[18]  Pallant, J. 2001. SPSS Survival Manual. A step-by-step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows. New South Wales, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
 
[19]  Richards, Jack C & Richard Smith 2010 Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics 4th edition, Britain: Pearson Longman.
 
[20]  Westwood, Peter. 2008. What Teachers Need to Know about Reading and Writing Difficulties. Australia: Acer Press.
 
[21]  Tankersley, Karen. (2003). The Threads of Reading. Alexandria: ASCD.
 
[22]  Abdullah Hasan. American Journal of Educational Research, 2018 Vol.6 No.2. 123-128.