Women – an Under-Represented Population in American and International Doctoral Studies

Barbara Deveaux Holmes¹, Robin Dalton¹, Dionne Ellis^1, , Amanda Sargent-Lewis¹, Laura Scott¹ and Sharon Waters¹

¹Hampton University, USA

Cite this paper:
Barbara Deveaux Holmes, Robin Dalton, Dionne Ellis, Amanda Sargent-Lewis, Laura Scott and Sharon Waters. Women – an Under-Represented Population in American and International Doctoral Studies. American Journal of Educational Research. 2015; 3(10):1324-1329. doi: 10.12691/education-3-10-19

Abstract

The retention of women in doctoral programs continues to be a challenge for higher education today. The PhD is considered the most prestigious and most international of all degrees. This paper reviews the key findings and messages from a range of publications to corroborate the key research evidence relating to the reason why women are not enrolling into doctoral programs. It then explores possible explanations and justifications for the attainment gap between women and men in doctoral programs. The paper addresses some of the reasons why women are more likely than men to dropout of doctoral programs. There is a huge disparity between men and women, who pursue PhD degrees in the fields of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). This paper will address some reasons why women of color are undereducated and underutilized in the area of STEM, and will focus on aspects of social media, status are able to communicate with peers and faculty. Social media can help students build and cultivate relationships that will have an impact on attrition rates on doctoral programs. The cohort model and peer mentoring programs have been instrumental as well in the growth of doctoral programs for the under-represented population of women.

Keywords:
attrition in doctoral studies women in science technology engineering and math (STEM) fields technology social media cohort model

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	AAUW. (2007). Behind the pay gap. American Association of University Women. Washington DC: AAUW Educational Foundation. Retrieved from www.aauw.org.
[2]	Ahuja, M. K. & Galvin, J. E. (2003). ‘Socialization in virtual Groups’, Journal of Management. 29(2): 161-185.
[3]	Altbach, P. G. (2004). Higher education crosses borders. Change, 36, 18-25.
[4]	Angiers, N. (2009). “Geek Chic” and Obama, New Hope for Lifting Women in Science. New York Times, 19.
[5]	Appel, R. (2010, September 19). Women earning more doctoral degrees than men in U.S. The New York Times.
[6]	Bair, C. R., Haworth, J. G., & Sandfort, M. (2004). Doctoral student learning and development: A shared responsibility. National Association of Student Personnel Administrators (NASPA) Journal, 41, 709-726.
[7]	Baram-Tsabari, A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2013). An instrument for assessing scientists’ written skills in public communication of science. Science Communication, 35(1), 56-85.
[8]	Barnes, B., & Randall, J. (2012). Doctoral Student Satisfaction: An Examination of Disciplinary, Enrollment, and Institutional Differences.Research In Higher Education, 53(1), 47-75.
[9]	Bement, A. (2009). Comments to the Advisory Committee for the GPRA Performance Assessment. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
[10]	Bernstein, B. L. (2011). Managing barriers and building supports in science and engineering doctoral programs: Conceptual underpinnings for a new online training program for women. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17(1), 29-50.
[11]	Bromley, A. P., Boran, J. R., & Myddelton, W. A. (2007). Investigating the baseline skills of research students using a competency-based self-assessment method. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(2), 117-37.
[12]	Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering. (2009), Biennial Report to Congress. Arlington, VA: The National Science Foundation.
[13]	CPST. (2007). Four decades of STEM degrees, 1996-2004: The devil is in the details. Report no.6. Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology, STEM Workforce Data Project. Retrieved from www.cpst.org.
[14]	Edwards, D., Radloff, A., & Coates, H. (2009). Supply, demand and characteristics of the higher degree by research population in Australia. Canberra: Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research.
[15]	Gardner, S. K. (2009). Student and faculty attributions of attrition in high and low-competing doctoral programs in the United States. Higher Education. 58, 97-112.
[16]	George, Y. S., Neale, D. S., Van Horne, V., & Malcolm, S. M. (2001). In pursuit of a diverse science, technology, engineering, and mathematics workforce. Retrieved from American Association for the Advancement of Science website: http://ehrweb. aaas. org/mge/Reports/Report1/AGEP/AGEP_report. pdf.
[17]	Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At Cross Purposes: What the Experiences of Today's Doctoral Students Reveal about Doctoral Education.
[18]	Grube, S. A., Cedarholm, K., Jones, C., & Dunn, M. (2005). Master’s student life: The balance between student and professional. The College Student Affairs Journal, 24(2), 152-161.
[19]	Hanson, S. (2004). African American women in science: Experiences from high school through the post-secondary years and beyond. NWSA Journal. 16(1), 96-115.
[20]	Haynes, C., Bulson, M., & Grant-Harris, M. (2012). My world is not my doctoral program..or is it? Female students’ perceptions of well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 1-17.
[21]	Holmstrom, E. I., & Holmstrom, R. W. (1974). The plight of the woman doctoral student. American Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 1-17.
[22]	Hyun, J. K., Quinn, B. C., Madon, T., & Lusting, S. (2006). Graduate student mental health: Needs assess-ment and utilization of counseling. Journal of College Student Development, 47, 247-266.
[23]	Ivankova, N. &. Stick (2007). Students' persistence in a distributed doctoral program in education leadership in higher education: A mixed methods study. Research in Higher Education, 93-135.
[24]	Kuijpers, M. A., & Scheerens, J. (2006). Career competencies for the modern career. Journal of Career Development, 32, 303-319.
[25]	Linn, M. (2007). Women in science: Can evidence inform the debate? Science, 317, 199-200.
[26]	Longfield, A., Romas, J., & Irwin, J. D. (2006). The self-worth, physical and social activities of graduate students: A qualitative study. College Student Journal, 40(2), 282-292.
[27]	Lovitts, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). The hidden crisis in graduate education: Attrition from Ph. D. programs. Academe, 86(6), 44.
[28]	Marschke, R., Laursen, S., Nielsen, J. M., & Dunn-Rankin, P. (2007). Demographic inertia revisited: An immodest proposal to achieve equitable gender representation among faculty in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(1), 1-26.
[29]	Nelson, D.J. (2007). A national analysis of minorities in science and engineering faculties at research universities. Norman: University of Oklahoma.
[30]	NSF. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Arlington, VA: (2012). Degrees Earned by Underrepresented Minorities. Arlington, VA NSF 16-311.
[31]	NSF. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Arlington, VA: (2008). Thirty-Three Years of Women in S&E Faculty Positions. Arlington, VA NSF 08-308.
[32]	NSF. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Arlington, VA: (2007a). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. NSF 07-315.
[33]	NSF. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Arlington, VA: (2007b). Back to school: Five myths about girls and science. Press Release 07-108.
[34]	NSF. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Arlington, VA: 2006a). Science and engineering doctorate awards. 2005, NSF 07-305.
[35]	NSF. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Arlington, VA: (2006b). Time to degree of U. S. research doctorate recipients. NSF 06-312.
[36]	NSF. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Arlington, VA: (2006c). Science and engineering indicators 2006. NSF 06-01.
[37]	NSF. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Arlington, VA: (2004b). Gender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers. NSF 04-323.
[38]	Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L., & Orield, G.. (2010). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The National Science Foundation, Washington DC.
[39]	Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L. L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172-209.
[40]	Oswalt, S., & Riddock, C. (2007). What to do about being overwhelmed: Graduate students, stress and university services. College Student Affairs Journal, 27(1), 24-44.
[41]	Price-Sharps, J., Tillery, A., Giuliani, L., Poulsen, E., Bermio-Gonzalez, R., Vucovich-Cholakian, S., & Roy-Pogutter, J. (2014).
[42]	Mentoring women doctoral students to become community leaders. Women & Therapy, 371(1-2), 83-93.
[43]	Rovai, A. (2002). Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. Internet and Higher Education. 5(3), 197-211.
[44]	Rychen, D. S. & Salganik, L. H. (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society. Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
[45]	Servage, L. (2009). Alternative and professional doctoral programs: what is driving the demand?. Studies In Higher Education, 34(7), 765-779.
[46]	Spaulding, L. S. & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J. (2012). Hearing their Voices: Factors doctoral candidates attribute to their persistence: International Journal of Doctoral Studies. (7)16.
[47]	Stehlik, T. (2011). Launching a Career or Reflecting on Life? Reasons, Issues and Outcomes for Candidates Undertaking PhD Studies Mid-Career or after Retirement Compared to the Traditional Early Career Pathway. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 51.
[48]	Task Force on Higher Education and Society. (2000). Higher education in developing countries: Peril and promise. Washington, DC: Task Force on Higher Education and Society, World Bank.
[49]	Wandering Scholars. (2005, September 8). The Economist. Retrieved November 12, 2013, from http://www.economist.com/node/4340017.