Development of Cognitive Skills in the Field of Education

Nebue Mpanya Marceline^1,

¹Head of work, University of Kabinda, RD Congo

Cite this paper:
Nebue Mpanya Marceline. Development of Cognitive Skills in the Field of Education. American Journal of Educational Research. 2024; 12(7):232-239. doi: 10.12691/education-12-7-3

Abstract

This article examines the trends, challenges, and opportunities related to the development of cognitive skills in the field of education. Based on a critical analysis of the above discussions, it explores the predominance of knowledge and comprehension levels, the lack of representation of higher cognitive levels, the variability between disciplines, and the importance of application and critical thinking. The article highlights current gaps in teaching and evaluation methods, emphasizing the need for a shift towards more advanced cognitive skills. It also discusses the implications for educational practice and the necessity for educators to adopt strategies that foster critical thinking, problem-solving, and practical application of knowledge. Drawing on recent research and concrete examples, the article proposes recommendations for a more integrative educational approach that focuses on the holistic development of cognitive skills, ensuring students are well-prepared for the complexities of the modern world. By advocating for innovative pedagogical practices and continuous teacher training, the article underscores the importance of collaboration among educators, policymakers, parents, and communities in transforming education to meet the demands of the 21st century.

Keywords:
education cognitive skills evaluation bloom's taxonomy critical thinking

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Crowe, A., Dirks, C. and Wenderoth, M. P. (2008). Biology in bloom: implementing Bloom's taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. 4, CBE—Life Sciences Education, Vol. 7, pp. 368-381.
[2]	Churches, A. (2008). Bloom's digital taxonomy. Educational Origami. http://edorigami. wikispaces.
[3]	Armstrong, P., et al. (2016). Developing and evaluating an innovative tool for online formative assessment of the quality of texts using Bloom's taxonomy. Computers & Education, Vol. 94, pp. 173-185.
[4]	Korucu, A. T. and Alkan, A. (2011). Differences between constructivist and traditional learning environments in students' motivation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 28, pp. 466-470.
[5]	Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. 4., Theory into Practice, Vol. 41, pp. 212-218.
[6]	Stiggins, R. J., et al. (2012). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it right – using it well.
[7]	Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design.
[8]	Popham, W. J. (2013). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know.
[9]	Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment.
[10]	Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom.
[11]	Barnett, W. S., et al. (2008). Étude longitudinale sur l'apprentissage et l'évolution des compétences cognitives.
[12]	Fiedler-Ferrara, N. (2010). Complex thinking: building a new paradigm. Trans. Clarissa Almeida, Anja Pratschke. V!RUS. http://www.nomads.usp.br, 3.
[13]	Paul, R. and Elder, L. (1997). Critical thinking: The nature of critical and creative thought. Journal of Developmental Education. Vol. 21, 2, pp. 34-35.
[14]	Jonassen, D. H. and Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction (1st ed.). . New York: Routledge,.
[15]	Laval, V. (2019). Chapitre 4. Les théories de Lev Vygotski (1896-1934) et de Jérôme Bruner (1915-2016). La psychologie du développement. pp. 87-109.
[16]	De ketele, J.M. (2013). Evaluation et enseignement: pour quels objectifs ? Par quels moyens ? Rev. Franc, de Linguistique Appliquée. Université Catholique de Louvain, Vol. XVIII, 1.
[17]	Roegiers, X. (2000) Approche par compétences et pédagogie de l’intégration.
[18]	Talbot, L. (2017). L’évaluation formative comment évaluer pour remédier aux difficultés. Gallimard.
[19]	Barbier, J.M. (1985). L’évaluation en formation. Paris : PUF.
[20]	Bloom, B., et al. (1982). Taxonomie des objectifs pédagogiques. Québec: Education nouvelle.
[21]	Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives – The classification of educational goals – Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. London: Longman.
[22]	Chandio, M. T., Pandhiani, S. M., & Iqbal, R. (2016). Bloom’s Taxonomy: Improving assessment and teaching-learning process. Journal of Education and Educational Development Vol. 3, 2, pp. 203-221.
[23]	Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction.
[24]	Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. [book auth.] J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.). Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice. s.l.: W.H. Freeman, pp. 9-26.
[25]	Halpern, D. F. (1999). Teaching for Critical Thinking: Helping College Students Develop the Skills and Dispositions of a Critical Thinker.
[26]	Brookfield, S. D. Teaching for critical thinking: Tools and techniques to help students question their assumptions. s.l.: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
[27]	Scriven, M. and Paul, R. (2007). Defining Critical Thinking..
[28]	Kabongo Malonda, C. (2015). La problématique de la formulation des objectifs opérationnels dans les leçons d’éveils à l’école primaire. Mémoire de DEA en Psychologie. Lubumbashi: Université de Lubumbashi.
[29]	Petit-Jean, B. (1984). Formes et fonctions des différents types d’évaluations. Pratiques., 44.
[30]	Omadeke, Kupelesa Edumbe (2008). Les opinions des élèves et des enseignants de Masina sur le redoublement scolaire. Mémoire. Kinshasa: ISPR.
[31]	Baribeau, A. (2015). Analyse des pratiques d’évaluation d’enseignants du secondaire IV et V dans des décisions sommatives de certification des apprentissages des élèves (Thèse inédite). Québec : Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières,.
[32]	Pinto, J., Rodrigues, H. B., & Silva, V. S. (2019). Evaluation de l’enseignement et de l’apprentissage. Revista Cientifica Multidisciplinar Nucléo do conhecimento. 11, Vol. 3, 4, pp. 2448 – 0959.