The Lived Experiences of Graduate Students During In-Person and Remote Learning Platforms: Basis for Blended Learning Framework

Joel M. Cuadra^1, and Ena A. Bernal¹

¹Colegio de San Juan de Letran – Calamba, Philippines

Cite this paper:
Joel M. Cuadra and Ena A. Bernal. The Lived Experiences of Graduate Students During In-Person and Remote Learning Platforms: Basis for Blended Learning Framework. American Journal of Educational Research. 2023; 11(3):151-158. doi: 10.12691/education-11-3-8

Abstract

The spread of the Covid-19 coronavirus worldwide triggered a national emergency, and institutions in more than 100 countries were forced to restrict their operations temporarily. Institutions like schools were pushed to switch from conventional classroom education to online learning. This study applied a phenomenological and qualitative research design to investigate the participants' experiences in in-person and remote learning settings. The inquiry revealed themes relating to graduate school students' lived experiences which served as the foundation for developing a blended learning framework for the graduate studies department. Human interaction with sub-themes of engagement and participation and social connection emerged during the in-depth interview of graduate students in in-person and remote learning; passive learning with its sub-theme engaging learning environment, immediate feedback, availability, and accessibility of resources; and saving time incurred expenses in in-person learning. Subsequently, the benefits of remote education and its sub-themes were cost-saving measures, resiliency, adaptability and convenience, and flexibility under remote learning technical issues like internet connectivity and technical problems in learning platforms. Difficulty and challenges with sub-themes, such as physical fatigue and lack of concentration, also emerged. The lack of communication and timely communication and coordination were also revealed in their remote learning experiences. This study also identified the graduate students' in-person and remote learning coping mechanisms. The in-person coping mechanism of a graduate student was social connection, and the remote learning coping mechanisms were time management and seeking support. The proposed blended learning framework was the expected output of this research.

Keywords:
blended learning coping mechanism graduate student in-person learning remote learning

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Santos, A. P. (2020, October 6). In the Philippines, distance learning reveals the digital divide. Retrieved from https://eu.boell.org/en/2020/10/06/philippines-distance-learning-reveals-digital-divide.
[2]	Baticulon, R. E., Alberto, N. R., Baron, M. B., Mabulay, R. E., Rizada, L. G., Sy, J. J., Tiu, C. J., Clarion, C. A. & Reyes, J. C. (2020). Barriers to online learning in the time of COVID-19: A national survey of medical students in the Philippines. medRxiv.
[3]	Hrastinski, S. (2019). What Do We Mean by Blended Learning? TechTrends, 63(5), 564-569.
[4]	Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The Philippine context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4).
[5]	Chiu, T. K. F., Lin, T.-J., & Lonka, K. (2021). Motivating online learning: The challenges of COVID-19 and beyond. In (pp. 1-4): Springer.
[6]	Garrison, D. R. (2018). Designing a Community of Inquiry. Community of Inquiry. Available from http://www.thecommunityofinquiry.org/editorial9.
[7]	Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1).
[8]	O'Connell, A. (2016). Seven blended learning models used today in higher ed. Retrieved from http://acrobatiq.com/seven-blended-learning-models-used-today-in-higher-ed/.
[9]	Arbaugh, J., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 133-136.
[10]	Garrison, D. R. (2009). Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous remote learning: The role of reflective inquiry, self-direction, and metacognition. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality remote education: Practice and direction. Volume 4 in the Sloan C Series. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
[11]	Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing environment. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2).
[12]	Chakraborty, Misha, Nafukho, Fredrick Muyia (2015). Strategies for Virtual Learning Environments: Focusing on Teaching Presence and Teaching Immediacy. Internet Learning Journal. Spring 2015, 4 (1), 8-37.
[13]	Wang, Y., Han, X., & Yang, J. (2015). Revisiting the blended learning literature: Using a complex adaptive systems framework. Educational Technology & Society, 18 (2), 390.
[14]	Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
[15]	Creswell, J. W. (2013). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
[16]	Cresswell, JW, Plano Clark VL (2014). Designing and conducting mixed-method research. 2nd Sage; Thousand Oaks, CA: 2014.
[17]	Gunawan, J. (2015). Ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research. Belitung Nursing Journal, 1(1), 10-11.
[18]	Brown, S.C., Richard a. Stevens, J., Troiano, P.F., & Schneider, M.K. (2002). Exploring Complex Phenomenon: Grounded Theory in Student Affairs Research, Journal of College Student Development, 43, 2, 1-11.
[19]	Morrow, SL 2005, 'Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250-60.
[20]	Bashir, M., Afzal, M. T., & Azeem, M. (2008). Reliability and validity of qualitative and operational research paradigm. Pakistan journal of statistics and operation research, 35-45.
[21]	Carcary, M. (2009). The research audit trial—enhancing trustworthiness in qualitative inquiry. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 7(1), pp11-24.
[22]	Muir, T.; Milthorpe, N.; Stone, C.; Dyment, J.; Freeman, E.; Hopwood, B. Chronicling engagement: Students’ experience of online learning over time. Distance Educ. 2019, 40, 262–277.
[23]	Biel, R., and Brame, C. J. (2016). Traditional versus remote biology courses: connecting course design and student learning in an remote setting. J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. 17, 417-422.
[24]	Waghid F (2018) Action research and educational technology: cultivating disruptive learning. South African J High Educ 32(4): 1-11.
[25]	Alejandrino, P. (2020). UST Implements' Enriched Virtual Mode' Next Academic Year; Extends Financial Assistance. Manila, PH: TomasinoWeb.
[26]	Gratton-Lavoie, C., and Stanley, D. (2019). Teaching and learning principles of microeconomics remote: An empirical assessment. J. Econ. Educ. 40, 3-25.
[27]	Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define remote learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of remote learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289-306.
[28]	Guevarra, R., & Cimanes, R. (2017). Stress coping mechanism and its impact to their age among Senior High School students at Parañaque National High School -Baclaran. International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, 3(7), 53-65.
[29]	Kwaah, C. Y., & Essilfie, G. (2017). Stress and coping strategies among distance education students at the University of Cape Coast, Ghana. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(3), 120-134.