American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2022, 10(3), 155-160
DOI: 10.12691/education-10-3-7
Open AccessArticle

Online Education and Anxiety among University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abdulfattah Yaghi1,

1Department of Government and Society, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE

Pub. Date: March 20, 2022

Cite this paper:
Abdulfattah Yaghi. Online Education and Anxiety among University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic. American Journal of Educational Research. 2022; 10(3):155-160. doi: 10.12691/education-10-3-7

Abstract

Aim: The study examined the effects of emergency online education on the mental wellbeing of university students during COVID-19 pandemic. Subject and Method: The fast spread of COVID-19 forced universities to shift from conventional pedagogy to online education. Many students, however, encountered mental challenges during this transition. To examine anxiety caused by the pandemic and the lockdown policies, a questionnaire was developed and evaluated by five experts in psychology, management, and education before it was administered through WhatsApp and Facebook to a convenience sample of 1,749 students from eight universities in Jordan during the period of April 7, 2020 and May 28, 2020. Cronbach Alpha level of the questionnaire was acceptable at level α = 0.893. The study was fully approved by the Institutional Review Board and SPSS V26 was used to perform univariate and multivariate statistics. Results: Online education resulted in anxiety and other mental health concerns for over 83% of the students. Nine factors explain students’ anxiety: worries about finances, owning a personal computer, logistical requirements, social impact, family income, anxiety about the future, teachers’ roles, students’ technical knowledge, housing arrangements, technical requirements, awareness, and technical knowledge of teachers. Conclusion: As the pandemic continues to be a serious threat, anxiety and other mental problems if not managed, can produce more health complications for students. Therefore, universities need effective remedial procedures for protecting students’ mental health during and after the pandemic.

Keywords:
coronavirus COVID-19 stress mental health anxiety online education

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  WHO 2020. Situation reports. Available at https://www.who.int/emergenccies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports/ accessed April 20, 2020.
 
[2]  UNESCO. (2020, March 4a). 290 million students out of school due to COVID-19: UNESCO releases first global numbers and mobilizes response. Retrieved April 17, 2020, from UNESCO: https://en.unesco.org/news/290-million-students-out-school-due-covid-19- unesco-releases-first-global-numbers-and-mobilizes.
 
[3]  UNESCO. (2020b). COVID-19 Educational Disruption and Response. Retrieved April 17, 2020, from UNESCO: https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse.
 
[4]  Huang, R. H., Liu, D. J., Tlili, A., Yang, J. F., Wang, H. H. 2020. Handbook on facilitating flexible learning during educational disruption: The Chinese experience in maintaining undisrupted learning in COVID-19 Outbreak. Beijing: Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University. Available http://www.alecso.org/nsite/images/pdf/1-4-2.pdf.
 
[5]  Setiawan, A. R. 2020. Scientific Literacy Worksheets for Distance Learning in the Topic of Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). Available https://edarxiv.org/swjmk/.
 
[6]  Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., Althunibat, A. 2020. Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 1, 1-30.
 
[7]  Sabri, H. A., El-Refae, G. A. 2006. Accreditation in higher business education in the private sector: The case of Jordan. J. Mark. High. Educ. 16(1), 47-76.
 
[8]  Ülker, D., Yılmaz, Y. 2016. Learning management systems and comparison of open source learning management systems and proprietary learning management systems. J. Syst. Integr. 7(2), 18-24.
 
[9]  Haghshenas, M. 2019. A model for utilizing social Softwares in learning management system of E-learning. Quarterly Journal of Iranian Distance Education. 1(4), 25-38.
 
[10]  Yaghi, A., Al-Jenaibi, B. 2018. Happiness, morality, rationality, and challenges in implementing smart government policy. Public Integrity. 20(3), 284-299.
 
[11]  O'Donoghue, J., Singh, G., Green, C. 2004. A comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of IT based education and the implication upon students. Digit. Educ. Rev. (9), 63-76.
 
[12]  Yaghi, A. 2008. Using Petra Simulation in teaching graduate courses in human resource management: A hybrid pedagogy. J Public Aff. Educat. 14(3), 399-412.
 
[13]  Yaghi, A., Al-Jenaibi, B. 2017. Organizational Readiness for E-governance: A Study of Public Agencies in the United Arab Emirates. South Asian J Manag. 24(1), 7-31.
 
[14]  Tarus, J. K., Gichoya, D., Muumbo, A. 2015. Challenges of implementing e-learning in Kenya: A case of Kenyan public universities. International review of research in open and distributed learning, 16(1), 120-141.
 
[15]  Kanwal, F., Rehman, M. 2017. Factors affecting e-learning adoption in developing countries–empirical evidence from Pakistan’s higher education sector. IEEE Access. 5, 10968-10978.
 
[16]  Yaghi, A., Alibeli, M. 2014. Solving Real Community Problems to Improve the Teaching of Public Affairs. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching. 25(1), 27-53.
 
[17]  Dabbagh, N., Bannan-Ritland, B. 2005. Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application (pp. 68-107). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.
 
[18]  Ali, S., Uppal, M. A., Gulliver, S. R. 2018. A conceptual framework highlighting e-learning implementation barriers. Inform. Technol. People. 31(1), 157-180.
 
[19]  Yaghi, A. 2009. Contacting the Government among College Students. J. Polit. Sci. Educ. 5(2), 154-172.
 
[20]  Bozkaya, M., Aydin, I. E., Kumtepe, E. G. 2012. Research Trends and Issues in Educational Technology: A Content Analysis of TOJET (2008-2011). TOJET. 11(2), 264-277.
 
[21]  Al Ghamdi, A. 2017. Influence of lecturer immediacy on students’ learning outcomes: Evidence from a distance education program at a university in Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Info. Edu. Technol. 7(1), 35-39.
 
[22]  Almaiah, M. A., Alyoussef, I. Y. 2019. Analysis of the effect of course design, course content support, course assessment and instructor characteristics on the actual use of E-learning system. IEEE Access. 7, 171907-171922.
 
[23]  Varalakshmi, R., Arunachalam, K. 2020. COVID 2019–role of faculty members to keep mental activeness of students. Asian J. Psychiatr. 51(102091), p. 1-3.
 
[24]  Abouchedid, K., Eid, G. M. 2004. E-learning challenges in the Arab world: Revelations from a case study profile. Quality Assurance in Education. 12(1), 15-27.
 
[25]  Almekhlafi, A. G., Almeqdadi, F. A. 2010. Teachers' perceptions of technology integration in the United Arab Emirates school classrooms. J. Educ. technol. Soc. 13(1), 165-175.
 
[26]  Al-Gahtani, S. S. 2016. Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model. Appl. Comput. Informat. 12(1), 27-50.
 
[27]  Taat, M. S., Francis, A. 2020. Factors Influencing the Students' Acceptance of E-Learning at Teacher Education Institute: An Exploratory Study in Malaysia. Int. J. High. Educ. 9(1), 133-141.
 
[28]  Abdullah, F., Ward, R., 2016. Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Comput. Human Behav. 56, 238-256.
 
[29]  Alhabeeb, A., Rowley, J. 2017. Critical success factors for eLearning in Saudi Arabian universities. Int. J. Edu. Manage. 31(2), 131-147.
 
[30]  Eltahir, M. E. 2019. E-learning in developing countries: Is it a panacea? A case study of Sudan. IEEE Access. 7, 97784-97792. Available https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8768377.
 
[31]  Aung, T. N., Khaing, S. S. 2015. Challenges of implementing e-learning in developing countries: A Review. In International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computing (pp. 405-411). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
 
[32]  de Oliveira Araújo, F. J., de Lima, L. S. A., Cidade, P. I. M., Nobre, C. B., Neto, M. L. R. 2020. Impact of Sars-Cov-2 And its reverberation in global higher education and mental health. Psy. Res. 288 (112977), 1-2.
 
[33]  Mulhanga, M. M. and Lima, S. R. 2017). Podcast as e-learning enabler for developing countries: Current initiatives, challenges and trends. In Proceedings of the 2017 9th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers (pp. 126-130).
 
[34]  Dagli, R. 2020. Fear and anxiety-coping strategies during COVID-19 pandemic in lockdown. J. Int. Oral Health. 12(3), 187-188.
 
[35]  Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., Rubin, G. J. 2020. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 395, March 14. 2020, 912-920.
 
[36]  Babbie, E. R. 2013. The Basics of Social Research. Boston: Cengage learning.‏