Challenges and Adaptive Strategies of Out-of-Field Mathematics Teachers in the Province of Misamis Oriental, Philippines

Hernono B. Lopez Jr.^1, and Dennis B. Roble¹

¹University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Lapasan Highway, Cagayan de Oro City Philippines

Cite this paper:
Hernono B. Lopez Jr. and Dennis B. Roble. Challenges and Adaptive Strategies of Out-of-Field Mathematics Teachers in the Province of Misamis Oriental, Philippines. American Journal of Educational Research. 2022; 10(3):111-115. doi: 10.12691/education-10-3-1

Abstract

If students are well-trained by teachers who are adept and confident in teaching their subject matter, certainly learners will be developed as lifelong learners and capable of helping in the fast economic development of the country. This study aimed to determine the profile, content mastery, challenges, and adaptive strategies of out-of-field (OOF) mathematics teachers in the province of Misamis Oriental, Philippines. The investigation employed a descriptive research design with a total of eighty-six (86) sampled OOF mathematics teachers assigned to the prescribed research setting. Of the 86 OOF mathematics teachers, seventy-nine (79) in the sampled junior high schools are assigned to teach subjects other than their master piece. Hence, they are labeled as “out-of-field” teachers. In terms of the mathematics content mastery, results show that the respondents had a satisfactory performance while the majority of the respondents agreed that their respective schools have limited resources, equipment, and other learning facilities needed for teaching and learning. Furthermore, the findings revealed that OOF mathematics teachers used varied teaching approaches, engaged themselves in professional development training, and kept monitoring learners’ progress using varied assessment strategies from their carefully planned lessons and improvised instructional learning materials. Since this study has established that OOF teaching was prevalent in the research locale, the researchers recommended that school principals and school district supervisors look into this matter seriously so they can hire additional teachers with specific qualifications to augment the manpower of the district. A parallel study may also be conducted considering OOF teachers across all levels from other disciplines so that strategic interventions as well as policy on recruitment based on field of specialization must be properly implemented.

Keywords:
adaptive strategies challenges out-of-field teaching out-of-field teachers

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Du Plessis, A. (2014). Understanding the lived experience of Novice OOF teachers in relation to school leadership practice. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teachers Education. Volume 23, 2015. Issue 1.
[2]	Kim, E. (2011). Out-of-Field Secondary School Teachers in Korea: Their Realities and Implications. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy.
[3]	Weldon, P.R. (2015). The Teacher Workforce Australia: Supply, Demand and Data Issues. Camberwell VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? Article = 1001 & content= policy insights.
[4]	Ingersoll, R. (2003). Is there really a teacher shortage? Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy. University of Washington.
[5]	Sambe, M. (2015). Out-of-field teaching. The African perspective. Retrieved from http://www.tapmagonline.com/out-of-field-teacing-by-mariam-sambe/.
[6]	Seastrom, M. Gruber, K., Henke R., McGrath, D. & Cohen, B. (2004). Qualifications of the public school teacher workforce: Prevalence of out-of-field teaching. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC.
[7]	Caylao, F. R. (2015). My thoughts on out-of-field teaching. Sun. Star Pampanga. Retrieved November 5, 2016 from https://www.pressreader.com/.
[8]	Fameronag, Nicon F. “Politics: One Town’s Product.” Manila Times. 22 March 2004. Available at http://www.manilatimes.net.
[9]	Ingersoll R.M. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28 (2), 26-37.
[10]	Ingersoll R.M. (2003). Out-of-Field teaching and the limits of teaching policy. Philadelphia, PA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy
[11]	Ingersoll, R.M. (2004). Why some schools have more underqualified teachers than others?
[12]	Zumwalt, K., & Craig, E. (2005b). Teachers’ characteristics: Research on the indicators of quality. In M. Cochran-Smith and K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 157-260). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[13]	McConney, A. & Price, A. (2010). Teaching-out-of field in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Teacher Education; 34 (6), Article 6.
[14]	Laitsch, D. (2003). Teaching out-of-field: An overlooked factor in underqualified teaching. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Volume 1 (5).
[15]	Wilhelm, T. (2013). Teachers vs. administrators: Ending the adversarial relationship. Retrieved from http://education.cu-portland.edu/blog/leaders-link/teachers-vs-administrators-ending-the- adversarial-relationship/.
[16]	Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives Vol. 8 (1). Retrieved 9 Sept 2008 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1.
[17]	Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper presented at Australian Council for Educational Research Conference.
[18]	Ingvarson, L., Beavis, A. & Kleinhenz, E. (2004). Teacher Education Courses in Victoria: Perceptions of Their Effectiveness and Factors Affecting Their Impact. Report prepared by the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) for the Victorian Institute of Teaching (VIT). Retrieved 9 Sept. 2008 from http://www.vit.vic.edu.au/files/documents/382_FTP_final_report.pdf.
[19]	Riordain, M. N., & Hannigan, A. (2011). Who teaches mathematics at second level in Ireland? Irish Educational Studies, 30, 289-304.
[20]	Taylor, T. (2000). The Future of the Past: Final Report of the National Inquiry into School History. Faculty of Education, Monash University, Victoria, Australia. Retrieved Aug. 2008 from http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education/publications_resources/national_inquiry _into_school_history/chapter_5.htm.
[21]	Pillay, H., Goddard, R., & Wilss, L. (2005). Well-being, Burnout and Competence: Implications for Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. Vol. 30 (2), 22-33.
[22]	Bayani and Gubao (2017). Out-of-Field Teaching: Experiences of Non-Filipino Majors. Retrieved from http://tagum.umindanao.edu.ph/wpcontent/uploads/2020/05/Dr.-Rammel-T.-BayaniI-DTE-Publication.pdf.
[23]	Ho, C. (2014). The importance of effective communication. Research Within Reach. http://singteach.nie.edu.sg/issue50-people/.
[24]	Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2004). Nursing research: Principles and methods. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
[25]	Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing research.
[26]	Baldoni, J. (2010). The importance of resourcefulness. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved October 28,2016, from https://hbr.org/2010/01/leaders-can-learn-to-make-do-a/.
[27]	Briggs, S. (2015). The ultimate lesson: Teaching your students to be resourceful. Inform ED. Retrieved from http://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/features /the-ultimate-lesson-teaching-your-students-to-be- resourceful/.
[28]	Johnson, B. (2015). “Creative teacher” is not an oxymoron. Edutopia. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/blog/creative-teacher-not-oxymoron-ben-johnson.