Examining Distributed Leadership and School Outcomes in Finnish Compulsory School

T.J. Lahtero^1, , R. Ahtiainen¹ and M.-P. Vainikainen²

¹Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

²Faculty of Education and Culture, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

Cite this paper:
T.J. Lahtero, R. Ahtiainen and M.-P. Vainikainen. Examining Distributed Leadership and School Outcomes in Finnish Compulsory School. American Journal of Educational Research. 2020; 8(12):893-898. doi: 10.12691/education-8-12-2

Abstract

This paper discusses distributed leadership (DL) as educational leadership structure and its relation to school outcomes in compulsory schools. School outcomes are defined as students’ learning to learn abilities. This study tests two hypotheses. H1: DL is perceived as a continuum consisting of two ends (as delegation and as situation-based interaction between leaders and subordinates). H2: conceptualization of DL as situation-based interaction positively affects the outcomes of the school. The data are leadership inquiry and students’ longitudinal learning to learn follow-up data from grades 3 to 6 or grades 6 to 9. The results indicate that DL does not appear as a unidimensional continuum. Educational leadership is formed from multiple dimensions, and DL is one part of the whole; thus, H1 was incorrect. The conceptualization of DL as situation-based interaction is not statistically satisfactorily related to outcomes of the school; therefore, H2 was also incorrect. The paper concludes that results of this study point to the meaning of local education policy as a means of steering the distribution of students between schools in order to maintain the small between-school differences in student outcomes.

Keywords:
distributed leadership Finland learning to learn education policy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Harris, A., & Spillane, J. (2008). Distributed Leadership through the Looking Glass. Management in Education, 22(1), 31-34.
[2]	Timperley, H. (2005). Distributed leadership: Developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 395-420.
[3]	Duif, T., Harrison, C., van Dartel, N., & Sinyolo, D. (2013). Distributed leadership in practice - A descriptive analysis of distributed leadership in European schools. European Policy Network of School Leadership. http://www.schoolleadership.eu/sites/default/files/esha-etuce_report_on_dl.pdf.
[4]	Obadara, O. E. (2013). Relationship between distributed leadership and sustainable school improvement. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1), 69-74.
[5]	Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 251-269.
[6]	Mayrowetz, D. (2008). Making sense of distributed leadership: Exploring the multiple usages of the concept in the field. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(3), 424-435.
[7]	Stoten, D. W. (2014). Distributing leadership in English sixth form colleges: Liberation or another form of managerial control?. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(5), 522-538.
[8]	York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255-316.
[9]	Mehra, A., Smith, B. R., Dixon, A. L., & Robertson, B. (2006). Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 232-245.
[10]	Woods, P. A., Bennett, N., Harvey, J., & Wise, C. (2004). Variabilities and dualities in distributed leadership: Findings from a systematic literature review. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32(4), 439-457.
[11]	Kyllönen, M. (2011). Tulevaisuuden koulu ja johtaminen - Skenaariot 2020-luvulla [Future school and leadership]. Tampere: Tampereen Yliopistopaino Oy - Juvenes Print.
[12]	Spillane, J. P., & Healey, K. (2010). Conceptualizing school leadership and management from a distributed perspective: An exploration of some study operations and measures. The Elementary School Journal, 111(2), 253-281.
[13]	Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[14]	Juuti, P. (2013). Jaetun johtajuuden taito [Knowledge in distributed leadership]. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
[15]	Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: heresy, fantasy or possibility. School Leadership & Management, 23(3), 313-324.
[16]	Scribner, J. P., Sawyer, R. K., Watson, S. T., & Myers, V. L. (2007). Teacher teams and distributed leadership: A study of group discourse and collaboration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 67-100.
[17]	Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143-150.
[18]	Finnish National Agency for Education. (2017). Basic Education. http://www.oph.fi/english/curricula_and_qualifications/basic_education.
[19]	Finnish National Board of Education. (2014). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet [National core curriculum for basic education] (Publications 2014:5). Helsinki: Opetushallitus.
[20]	Lahtero, T. J., Lång, N., & Alava, J. (2017). Distributed leadership in practice in Finnish schools. School Leadership & Management, 37(3), 217-233.
[21]	Vainikainen, M.-P. (2014). Finnish primary school pupils’ performance in learning to learn assessment: A longitudinal perspective on educational equity. Helsinki: Unigrafia.
[22]	Ross, J. D., & Ross, C. M. (1979). Ross test of higher cognitive processes. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.
[23]	Demetriou, A., Platsidou, M., Efklides, A., Metallidou, Y., & Shayer. M. (1991). The development of quantitative-relational abilities from childhood to adolescence: Structure, scaling, and individual differences. Learning and Instruction, 1, 19-43.
[24]	Sternberg, R., Castejon, J. L., Prieto, M. D., Hautamäki, J., & Grigorenko, E. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Sternberg triarchic abilities test in three international samples: An empirical test of the triarchic theory of intelligence. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(1), 1-16.
[25]	Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
[26]	Leithwood, K. A., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S. E., & Knapp, M. S. (2012). Linking leadership to student learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.