American Journal of Energy Research
ISSN (Print): 2328-7349 ISSN (Online): 2328-7330 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajer Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Energy Research. 2025, 13(2), 72-79
DOI: 10.12691/ajer-13-2-3
Open AccessArticle

A Simulation-Based Study at Kenya's Ngong Hills Site, Optimizing Wind Farm Layouts for Cost-Effective Energy Production

Omboto J.K1, , Kamau J.N1, Saoke C.O1 and Wekesa D.W2

1Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

2MultiMedia University of Kenya

Pub. Date: July 28, 2025

Cite this paper:
Omboto J.K, Kamau J.N, Saoke C.O and Wekesa D.W. A Simulation-Based Study at Kenya's Ngong Hills Site, Optimizing Wind Farm Layouts for Cost-Effective Energy Production. American Journal of Energy Research. 2025; 13(2):72-79. doi: 10.12691/ajer-13-2-3

Abstract

Wind farm design increasingly demands careful balancing of energy yield, wake effects, and economic costs to meet renewable energy targets affordably. This study develops a simulation-based optimization framework tailored to the Ngong Hills wind farm in Kenya. Using a Python-based genetic algorithm paired with the Jensen wake model, we evaluate four layout scenarios: homogeneous layouts of Vestas V52 (850 kW) and NREL 5 MW turbines, as well as mixed configurations combining these or mid-sized Vestas V66 (1.75 MW) and V90 (3.0 MW) turbines, across 800,000 m² site with realistic wind speed and direction distributions. The genetic algorithm optimized turbine placements while enforcing minimum rotor-diameter-based spacing and varying hub heights in the same wind farm to mitigate wake interactions. Results showed that homogeneous V52 and NREL layouts achieved comparable LCOE of $52/MWh, but required trade-offs between the number of turbines and spacing. A hybrid layout mixing V52 and NREL turbines achieved the lowest LCOE of $37/MWh and reduced wake losses by 18.2%, highlighting the value of integrating heterogeneous turbines with staggered hub heights. In contrast, the V66+V90 layout, despite its higher AEP potential, suffered from increased wake interactions and capital costs, leading to an LCOE of $58/MWh. These findings show that a comprehensive economic evaluation, beyond assessing power output alone, proved essential to identifying truly optimal layouts. The mixed V52 + NREL configuration exemplifies how combining high-capacity turbines with densely packed smaller units can mitigate wake effects and minimize LCOE, outperforming homogeneous arrangements. These insights support a strategic layout and turbine design philosophy that considers site-specific wind characteristics, varied turbine types, and cost metrics to create more cost-effective and sustainable wind farms.

Keywords:
Wind farm layout optimization Genetic algorithm Jensen wake model Heterogeneous turbine configurations Annual Energy Production Levelized Cost of Energy

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Tumse, S., Bilgili, M., Yildirim, A., & Sahin, B. (2024). Comparative analysis of global onshore and offshore wind energy characteristics and potentials. Sustainability, 16(15), 6614.
 
[2]  Baptista, J., Jesus, B., Cerveira, A., & Solteiro Pires, E. J. (2023). Offshore wind farm layout optimisation considering wake effect and power losses. Sustainability, 15(13), 9893.
 
[3]  Liang, Z., & Liu, H. (2023). Layout optimization algorithms for the offshore wind farm with different densities using a full-field wake model. Energies, 16(16), 5916.
 
[4]  Feng, J., & Shen, W. Z. (2017). Design optimization of offshore wind farms with multiple types of wind turbines. Applied Energy, 205, 1283–1297.
 
[5]  Charhouni, N., Sallaou, M., & Mansouri, K. (2019). Realistic wind farm design layout optimization with different wind turbines types. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 10(3), 307–318.
 
[6]  Dykes, K. (2020). Optimization of Wind Farm Design for Objectives Beyond LCOE. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1618(4), Article 042039.
 
[7]  Stanley, A. P., & Ning, A. (2019). Coupled wind turbine design and layout optimization with nonhomogeneous wind turbines. Wind Energy Science, 4(1), 99-114.
 
[8]  Wang, Z., Tu, Y., Zhang, K., Han, Z., Cao, Y., & Zhou, D. (2024). An optimization framework for wind farm layout design using CFD-based Kriging model. Ocean Engineering, 293, 116644.
 
[9]  Chen, K., Lin, J., Qiu, Y., Liu, F., & Song, Y. (2022). Joint optimization of wind farm layout considering optimal control. Renewable Energy, 182, 787-796.
 
[10]  Balasubramanian, K., Thanikanti, S. B., Subramaniam, U., & Sichilalu, S. (2020). A novel review on optimization techniques used in wind farm modelling. Renewable Energy Focus, 35, 84-96.
 
[11]  Lopez-Villalobos, C. A., Martinez-Alvarado, O., Rodriguez-Hernandez, O., & Romero-Centeno, R. (2022). Analysis of the influence of the wind speed profile on wind power production. Energy Reports, 8, 8079-8092.
 
[12]  Machidon, D., Istrate, M., & Beniuga, R. (2024). Wind Shear Coefficient Estimation Based on LIDAR Measurements to Improve Power Law Extrapolation Performance. Remote Sensing, 17(1), 23.
 
[13]  Schelbergen, M., Kalverla, P. C., Schmehl, R., & Watson, S. J. (2020). Clustering wind profile shapes to estimate airborne wind energy production. Wind Energy Science Discussions, 2020, 1-34.
 
[14]  Manwell, J. F., McGowan, J. G., & Rogers, A. L. (2009). Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application. 705.
 
[15]  Jain, P. (2011). Wind energy engineering. McGraw-Hill. http:// accessengineeringlibrary.com/browse/wind-energy-engineering.
 
[16]  Stevens, R. J., & Meneveau, C. (2017). Flow structure and turbulence in wind farms. Annual review of fluid mechanics, 49(1), 311-339.
 
[17]  Hwang, C., Jeon, J. H., Kim, G. H., Kim, E., Park, M., & Yu, I. K. (2015). Modelling and simulation of the wake effect in a wind farm. Journal of International Council on Electrical Engineering, 5(1), 74-77.
 
[18]  Bastankhah, M., & Porté-Agel, F. (2014). A new analytical model for wind-turbine wakes. Renewable energy, 70, 116-123.
 
[19]  Triantafyllou, P., & Kaldellis, J. K. (2021). Wind turbine wake models' evaluation for different downstream locations. Renewable Energy and Environmental Sustainability, 6, 40.
 
[20]  Frandsen, S. T. (2007). Turbulence and turbulence-generated structural loading in wind turbine clusters.
 
[21]  Gao, X., Li, Y., Zhao, F., & Sun, H. (2020). Comparisons of the accuracy of different wake models in wind farm layout optimization. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 38(5), 1725-1741.
 
[22]  Zhan, L., Letizia, S., & Iungo, G. V. (2020). Optimal tuning of engineering wake models through lidar measurements. Wind Energy Science, 5(4), 1601-1622.
 
[23]  Wind Turbine Cost: Worth The Million-Dollar Price In 2022? (2024, June 3). https://weatherguardwind.com/how-much-does-wind-turbine-cost-worth-it/.
 
[24]  Reddy, S. R. (2020). Wind Farm Layout Optimization (WindFLO): An advanced framework for fast wind farm analysis and optimization. Applied Energy, 269, 115090.
 
[25]  Khanali, M., Ahmadzadegan, S., Omid, M., Keyhani Nasab, F., & Chau, K. W. (2018). Optimizing layout of wind farm turbines using genetic algorithms in Tehran province, Iran. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 9(4), 399-411.
 
[26]  Gatscha, S. (2016). Generic Optimization of a Wind Farm Layout using a Genetic Algorithm (Masters thesis). University of Natural Resources and Life Science, Vienna.
 
[27]  Valotta Rodrigues, R., Pedersen, M. M., Schøler, J. P., Quick, J., & Réthoré, P. E. (2024). Speeding up large-wind-farm layout optimization using gradients, parallelization, and a heuristic algorithm for the initial layout. Wind Energy Science, 9(2), 321-341.
 
[28]  Lee, S., Soak, S., Kim, K., Park, H., & Jeon, M. (2008). Statistical properties analysis of real world tournament selection in genetic algorithms. Applied intelligence, 28(2), 195-205.
 
[29]  Bhargava, S. (2013). A Note on Evolutionary Algorithms and Its Applications. Adults Learning Mathematics, 8(1), 31-45.
 
[30]  Ma, Y., Archer, C. L., & Vasel-Be-Hagh, A. (2022). The Jensen wind farm parameterization. Wind Energy Science, 7(6), 2407-2431.
 
[31]  Shakoor, R., Hassan, M. Y., Raheem, A., & Wu, Y.-K. (2016). Wake effect modelling: A review of wind farm layout optimization using Jensen’s model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 1048–1059.
 
[32]  Hendrawati, D., Soeprijanto, A., & Ashari, M. (2019). Turbine wind placement with staggered layout as a strategy to maximize annual energy production in onshore wind farms. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(2), 334-340.
 
[33]  Yeghikian, M., Ahmadi, A., Dashti, R., Esmaeilion, F., Mahmoudan, A., Hoseinzadeh, S., & Garcia, D. A. (2021). Wind farm layout optimization with different hub heights in manjil wind farm using particle swarm optimization. Applied Sciences, 11(20), 9746.
 
[34]  Ziyaei, P., & Khorasanchi, M. (2025). Effect of cost elements on optimum layout of an offshore wind farm. Applied Ocean Research, 158, 104537.
 
[35]  Tang, X., Yang, Q., Wang, K., Stoevesandt, B., & Sun, Y. (2018). Optimisation of wind farm layout in complex terrain via mixed‐installation of different types of turbines. IET Renewable Power Generation, 12(9), 1065-1073.