Understanding Gender Differences on Motivations and Literary and Linguistic Devices in Graffiti

Christopher Allen S. Marquez^1, , Haydee D. James² and Mabel D. Mamaoag²

¹Social Sciences and Philosophy Department, Saint Mary’s University, Bayombong, Philippines

²Languages Department, Saint Mary’s University, Bayombong, Philippines

Cite this paper:
Christopher Allen S. Marquez, Haydee D. James and Mabel D. Mamaoag. Understanding Gender Differences on Motivations and Literary and Linguistic Devices in Graffiti. World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 2018; 4(3):177-188. doi: 10.12691/wjssh-4-3-6

Abstract

This study determined the use of graffiti in the restrooms, also called as latrinalia, in higher educational institutions. Further, this study determined the motives (Mass and Reflexive Communication, and Categorical and Individual Communication) behind the use of graffiti and the literary and linguistic styles between males and females. It utilized the gendered and motivational approaches to determine the motives between men and women in producing graffiti as well as the linguistic approach to determine the literary and linguistic devices. Photo-documentation was utilized to obtain the needed data. In terms of mass and reflexive communication, results revealed that both male and female graffiti were about expressions of their existence as proof and pleasure in aesthetic, creative and physical acts and boredom, but female graffiti were more about expression of oneself and documentation of group membership than male graffiti. In terms of categorical and individual communication, expressions of criticism and protest were more observed in female than male graffiti. While female graffiti contained writings about rejection and agreement/disagreement, male graffiti contained writings about search for contacts. Women made use of more literary and linguistic devices than males.

Keywords:
latrinalia communication self-expression gender development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	A Modern Perspective on Graffiti. (1995). Retrieved from https://www.graffiti.org/faq/cl.html.
[2]	Benefiel, R.R. (2010). Dialogues of ancient graffiti in the house of Maius Castricius in Pompeii. American Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 114, No. 1 (Jan., 2010), pp 59-101.
[3]	Mettler, M.L. (2012). Graffiti museum: A first amendment argument for protecting uncommissioned art on private property. Michigan Law Review, Vol. 111, No. 2 (November 2012), pp. 249-281.
[4]	Noble, C. (2004). City space: A semiotic and visual exploration of graffiti and public space in Vancouver. Retrieved from https://www.graffiti.org/faq/noble_semiotic_warfare2004.html.
[5]	Hutson, S.R. (2011). The art of becoming: the graffiti of Tikal, Guatemala. Latin American Antiquity, Vol. 22, No. 4 (December 2011), pp. 403-426.
[6]	Dundes, A. (1996). Here I sit--A study of American latrinalia. Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers 34: 91-105.
[7]	Vosgerchian, J. (2009). Boys, girls and bathroom graffiti. The Michigan Daily. December 8, 2009.
[8]	Gadsby, J. (1995). Looking at the Writing on the Wall: A Critical Review and Taxonomy of Graffiti Texts. Retrieved from https://www.graffiti.org/faq/critical.review.html.
[9]	Bruner, E. M. & Kelso, J. P. (1980). Gender Differences in Graffiti: A Semiotic Perspective. Women's Studies International Quarterly 3.2/3: 239-252.
[10]	Bates, J.A. & Martin, M. (1980). The thematic content of graffiti as a nonreactive indicator of male and female attitudes. The Journal of Sex Research, Vol. 16, No. 4 (Nov., 1980), pp. 300-315.
[11]	Wilson, J.Z. (2008). Pecking orders: Power relationships and gender in Australian prison graffiti. Ethnography, Vol. 9, No. 1 (March, 2008), pp. 99-121.
[12]	Leong, B. ((2010). American graffiti: deconstructing gendered communication patterns in bathroom stalls. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography. Volume 23, Issue 3, 2016.
[13]	Grider, S. A. (1975). Con Safos: Mexican-Americans, Names and Graffiti. Journal of American Folklore 88.347: 132-142.
[14]	Oganda, O.H & Mogambi, H. (2015). The language of graffiti on public transport vehicles in Kenya: Issues and perspectives. International Journal of Education and Research Vol. 3 No. 6 June 2015.
[15]	Bowen, T.E. (1999). Graffiti art. A contemporary study of Toronto artists. Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, Volume 41, Issue 1, 1999.
[16]	Dela Paz, C.L. (2009). A modern graffiti artisti: Hepe. Artes de las Filipinas. Retrieved from http://www.artesdelasfilipinas.com/archives/71/modern-graffiti-artist-hepe.
[17]	Art Radar. (2014). Manila’s mean streets: 7 Filipino street artists. Part 3. Retrieved from http://artradarjounal.com/2014/05/06manilas-mean-streets-7-filipino-street-artists-part-3/.
[18]	Yogan, L., & Johnson, L. M. (2006). Gender differences in jail house art and graffiti. The South Shore Journal, 1, 31-52.
[19]	Green, J.A. (2003). Writing in the stall: Gender and graffiti. Journal of language and Social Psychology. vol. 22 no. 3 282-296.
[20]	Fisher, M.L. (2014). Sex differences in the topics of bathroom graffiti. Human Ethology Bulletin – Proc. of the IV ISHE Summer Institute (2014): 68-81.
[21]	Sheivani, L., Taghinezhad, A., Alishavandi, A & Ranjbir S. (2015). Exploring linguistic aspects in Iranians’ graffiti. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research Volume 2, issue 5, 2015, pp. 62-73.
[22]	Nilsen, D.L.F. (1980). The grammar of graffiti. American Speech, Vol. 55, No. 3 (Autumn, 1980), pp. 234-239.
[23]	Gach, V. (1973). Graffiti. College English, Vol. 35, No. 3 (Dec., 1973), pp. 285-287.
[24]	Gross, D.D. & Gross, T.D. (1993). Tagging: Changing visual patterns and the rhetorical implications of a new form of graffiti. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, Vol. 50, No. 3, Special Issue: More E-Prime Controversy: The Second Symposium (Fall 1993), pp. 251-264.
[25]	Gopnik, B. (2011). Revolution in a can: Graffiti is as American as apple pie, but much easier to export. Foreign Policy, No. 189 (November 2011), pp.92-93.
[26]	Tannen, D. (1994). Talking from 9 to 5: Women and men in the workplace: Language, sex, and power. New York: Avon Books.