Participation of Youth in Community Development Programs in Uganda. A Comparative Study of Naads and HPI Programs in Bungokho Subcounty, Mbale District, Uganda

Anna Akandinda^1, , Clovice Kankya² and Peter R. Atekyereza¹

¹Department of Sociology and Anthropology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences (CHUSS), Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda

²Department of Biosecurity, Ecosystems and Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Bio-security (COVAB), Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda

Cite this paper:
Anna Akandinda, Clovice Kankya and Peter R. Atekyereza. Participation of Youth in Community Development Programs in Uganda. A Comparative Study of Naads and HPI Programs in Bungokho Subcounty, Mbale District, Uganda. World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 2016; 2(3):78-92. doi: 10.12691/wjssh-2-3-1

Abstract

The youth, especially in developing countries have not been successfully integrated into civil society, decision-making frameworks and the general development process, which affect their present and future livelihoods. Youth in Uganda continue to dominate ranks of most vulnerable and most powerless groups in the labour market and decision making spheres. It is therefore imperative to explore the dynamics of youth’s involvement in the development process. The study evaluated participation of the youth aged 15-30 years in community development programs in Uganda by comparing NAADS and HPI programs in Mbale district. The study used sample survey design to collect data from 165 individual households and 20 key informant interviews and 4 Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with female and male youth were conducted. Quantitative data was analysed using Statistical Package for social Scientist (SPSS) version 18. Qualitative data was analysed according to themes and sub themes of the study. The information gathered was utilized in identifying the level of youth involvement, benefits that accrue to youth through participation and the challenges associated with participation of youth in community development programs. Findings indicated limited involvement of youth in development process at all stages, save for implementation stage where 83% confirmed that they are involved. Through participation in community development programs, youth benefit from direct and indirect employment, acquisition of knowledge and skills, increased incomes, increased ownership of household assets/resources and improved family nutrition. The challenges for youth participation in community development (both NAADS and HPI) programs included lack of leadership and management skills among the youth, group regulatory barriers and impediments, development programs not targeting youth, irregular involvement of the youth, lack of information about development programs, youth holding negative attitude about the development programs, design and implementation challenges. There is a weakness in the lack of a comprehensive and consistence framework by both NAADS and HPI to ensure effective participation of youth at various levels of development process. It is therefore important for development actors to design youth engagement approaches and strategies to integrate youth in the development process right from program design stage. Also NAADS and HPI need to design special packages i.e. consider youth development needs and interests separate from the general community development needs and interests to attract youth to effectively participate in the process.

Keywords:
Participation youth community development Mbale district Uganda

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	DFID/Maguire, S. (2007). ‘Youth Mapping Study – DFID’s Approach to Young People’. United Kingdom.
[2]	UNFPA. (2007). ‘Framework for Action on Adolescents and Youth: Opening doors with young people: Four keys’; New York: UNFPA.
[3]	Haub, C., & Kent, M. (2009). Population Reference Bureau, (2009) World Population Data Sheet, Washington, DC.
[4]	Borode, M. (2011). Higher Education and Poverty reduction among youth in the Sub-saharan AfricaEuropean. Journal of Educational Studies 3(1): 149-155.
[5]	UNFPA. (2011). The State of World Population 2011, People and possibilities in a world of 7 billion, UK.
[6]	United Nations. (2006). Full employment and Decent Work for All: Regional Highlights, New York.
[7]	International Labour Organisation (2008). Global Employment Trends 2008, Geneva, United Kingdom.
[8]	International Labour Organisation 2012. Global employment trends for youth: Geneva, United Kingdom.
[9]	Government of Uganda (2010). UBOS Population estimates 2010, Kampala.
[10]	International Labour Organisation (2011). Global employment trends for youth: 2011 update Geneva, United Kingdom.
[11]	United Nations. (2007). World Youth Report 2007. New York, United Nations.
[12]	Government of Uganda (1995). The constitution of the Republic of Uganda, Kampala.
[13]	Pittman, E. K. (199). A Framework for Defining and Promoting Youth Participation. Future Choices Magazine.
[14]	USAID. (2006). EQ Review Educational Quality in the Developing World, New York
[15]	Barnett, R.V., & Brennan, M. A. (2006). Integrating youth into community development: Implications for policy planning and program evaluation. Journal of Youth Development 1(2): 16-27.
[16]	National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS). (2005). News and Events. NAADS electronic Newsletter. Retrieved from www.naads.or.ug.
[17]	Ekwamu, et al. (2005). “Four years of NAADS Implementation: Programme Outcomes and Impact.” In Uganda’s Ministry of Agriculture Animal Industry and Fisheries, (eds.), Proceedings of the Mid-Term Review of the National Agricultural Advisory Services. Kampala, Uganda: Ministry of Agriculture Animal Industry and Fisheries
[18]	NAADS secretariat 2005 news letter
[19]	NAADS secretariat 2010 news letter
[20]	NAADS secretariat 2013 news letter
[21]	Heifer Project International-Uganda, Annual report (2010), Kampala.
[22]	Farinde, A. J. (2000). Issues crucial to farm children development and sustainable in Nigeria and Annual Conference Proceeding of children in Agriculture (CIAP) 2000. Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
[23]	Hart, R. (1992). Children's Participation: Tokenism to Citizenship. UNICEF International Child Development Centre, Spedale degli lnnocenti, Florence, Italy.
[24]	Franklin, B. (1995). The Handbook of Children’s Rights, London, Routledge.
[25]	Westhorp, L. G. (1987). Planning for Youth Participation: A Resource Kit. Adelaide: Youth Sector Training Council of South Australia.
[26]	Gambone, M. A., Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2002). Finding Out What Matters for Youth: Testing Key Links in a Community Action Framework for Youth Development, Philadelphia: Youth Development Strategies, Inc., and Institute for Research and Reform in Education, Philadelphia, PA.
[27]	Paul. A., & Lefkovitz, B. (2006). Engaging Youth A How-To Guide for Creating Opportunities for Young People to Participate, Lead and Succeed, Sierra Health Foundation, Garden Highway Sacramento.
[28]	Malmberg, C.C. (1994) Case study on intermediate means of transport (IMT) Bicycle and rural women in Uganda. The World Bank and Economic Commission for Africa SSATP Working Paper No. 12, Sub-Saharan Africa Tran- sport Policy Programs (SSATP).
[29]	Catalano. R., Berglund, L. M., Ryan, J., Lonczak, H., & Hawkins, D. (1999). Positive Youth Development in the United States: Research Findings on Evaluations of Positive Youth Development, New York.
[30]	Larson, R. (2000). Towards a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist 55(1): 170-183.
[31]	Matthews, H. (2001). Citizenship, Youth Councils and Young People’s Participation, Journal of Youth Studies 4 (3): 301-310.
[32]	Freeman, C., Nairn, K., & Sligo, J. (2003). ‘Professionalizing’ Participation: From Rhetoric to Practice,” Children’s Geographies 1 (1): 53-70.
[33]	Asnarulkhadi, A. S. (2009). Kelompangan Dasar Belia Negara – Menyangga Potensi Belia Menerusi Pendekatan Transformasi Konflik. Malaysian, Journal of Youth Studies 1 (2): 1-22.