Can the Purpose of the State Be to Ensure the Happiness of Its Citizens?

Szilard Szelpal^1,

¹Doctoral School of Safety and Security Sciences Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary

Cite this paper:
Szilard Szelpal. Can the Purpose of the State Be to Ensure the Happiness of Its Citizens?. World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 2025; 11(1):1-5. doi: 10.12691/wjssh-11-1-1

Abstract

This essay explores the complex question of whether the purpose of the state is to ensure the happiness of its citizens. Anchored in historical and philosophical perspectives, it examines the interplay between the state, the individual, and the concept of happiness. The analysis begins with Louis XIV’s declaration, “The State is me,” as a point of departure to discuss the state as both a political structure and a moral ideal. By dissecting classical notions from Plato and Aristotle, the essay considers the evolution of statehood and citizenship, including their capacity to foster collective or individual happiness. It critiques Enlightenment-era and Renaissance thinkers like Machiavelli and Thomas More, who challenged and reimagined the state’s role in achieving an ideal society. The discussion extends to modern democracies, questioning whether their moral elevation parallels the divine authority once claimed by monarchs, and whether they serve the happiness of the people or a privileged elite. Ultimately, the essay argues that happiness is a subjective and individual phenomenon, one that no state can guarantee. Instead, the relationship between state and citizen is inherently a negotiation of mutual obligations, with happiness remaining an elusive ideal shaped more by individual agency than by external structures.

Keywords:
State happiness governance citizenship utopia individual freedom societal organisation democracy moral ideal collective aspiration subjective experience

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Rowe, C. (Trans.). (2012). The Republic by Plato. Penguin Classics.
[2]	Lord, C. (Trans.). (2013). Aristotle: Politics (2nd ed). University of Chicago Press.
[3]	Machiavelli, N. (1961). The Prince (G. Bull, Trans.). Penguin Books.
[4]	More, T. (2017). Utopia (R. Clarke, Trans.). Alma Classics. (Original work published 1516).
[5]	Campanella, T. (2024). City of the Sun (J. Doe, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1602).
[6]	Varga, S. (2008). Az egzisztencializmus hatása a kortárs filozófiára. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
[7]	Nagy, P. (1998). "Az etikai döntés metafizikája." Magyar Filozófiai Szemle, 42(1), 14–29.
[8]	Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1927).
[9]	Gombos, G. (1999). Történelem és etika: Egy egzisztencialista megközelítés. Debrecen: Egyetemi Kiadó.
[10]	Levinas, E. (1961). Totalité et infini: Essai sur l’extériorité. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
[11]	Sartre, J.-P. (1943). L’être et le néant: Essai d’ontologie phénoménologique. Paris: Gallimard.
[12]	Beauvoir, S. de. (1949). Le Deuxième Sexe. Paris: Gallimard.
[13]	Frankena, W. K. (1973). Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[14]	Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
[15]	Husserl, E. (1913). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
[16]	Smith, D. (2003). "Husserl’s Ethics and Normativity in Phenomenology." Philosophical Studies, 67(3), 267–284.
[17]	Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. "Metaphilosophy and Ethics." Retrieved from IEP Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
[18]	Kierkegaard, S. (1843). Fear and Trembling. Copenhagen: C. A. Reitzel.
[19]	Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[20]	Zahavi, D. (2003). Husserl’s Phenomenology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
[21]	Győrffy, M. (2002). "Metafizikai dilemmák és morális kérdések." Filozófia és Kultúra, 23(3), 12–20.
[22]	MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
[23]	Benda, J. (1994). "Életvilág és etikai normák." Magyar Filozófiai Szemle, 38(2), 15–27.
[24]	Ricoeur, P. (1990). Soimême comme un autre. Paris: Seuil.
[25]	Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[26]	Kis, J. (1989). "Etika és társadalom." Társadalmi Szemle, 43(5), 55–68.
[27]	Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[28]	Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[29]	Fodor, P. (2005). "Létezés és szabad akarat." Filoszofiai Fórum, 17(2), 33–48.
[30]	Dreyfus, H. L. (1991). Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.