Privatisation of State Owned Enterprises in Zambia: Winners and Losers

Royd Malisase^1,

¹Department of Political and Administrative Studies, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

Cite this paper:
Royd Malisase. Privatisation of State Owned Enterprises in Zambia: Winners and Losers. World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 2021; 7(1):10-17. doi: 10.12691/wjssh-7-1-2

Abstract

The performance of enterprises is important to the success of an economy. Privatisation has come to be viewed as the means through which development can be achieved. Nevertheless, scholars note that privatisation always has winners and losers. Therefore, there is a need to ensure that the majority come out on the winning side. This study determined the winners and losers from privatisation in Zambia. The study employed the Marxist theory of political economy which posits that privatisation benefits private investors and the state at the expense of workers and the general public. The study employed a qualitative approach using both primary and secondary data. Primary data came from interviews held with relevant officials while secondary data was sourced from published documents on privatisation. Data was analysed through thematic and document analysis, respectively. The study uncovered that until the early 1990s, Zambia had a socialist economy dominated by parastatals across all sectors. Privatisation in the country was pushed for by foreign interests through the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. The two institutions ordered the country to divest its parastatals as a condition for debt relief and further funding. Consequently, the country divested 265 enterprises, leaving only 30 parastatals. The state’s three branches were reconfigured to serve the interests of private firms. As expected by Marxists, private investors and the state emerged as winners while workers and the general public lost. Private investors made huge profits by barely paying any taxes while being shielded from major legal issues. The state in turn earned huge sums of money from the divesture and passed on responsibility for the provision of most goods and services. In contrast, thousands of employees lost jobs. Those who remained employed endured deteriorating working conditions. Citizens were overtaxed, lost access to social amenities, failed to compete with foreign investments and suffered health complications from industrial pollution. The study thus concludes that Zambia’s privatisation had more losers than winners.

Keywords:
privatisation parastatal private investors winners losers Zambia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Nellis, Privatization in Developing Countries: A Summary Assessment, SAIS Review of International Affairs, 27 (2). 3-29. 2007.
[2]	Fundanga, C.M. and Mwaba, A, Privatisation of Public Enterprises in Zambia: An valuation of the Policies, Procedures and Experiences, Economic Research Papers No. 35, African Development Bank, 1997.
[3]	Abioye, O, Privatisation of the Nigerian Railway Corporation: An Evaluation of Critical Choices, PhD Thesis, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, 2016.
[4]	Megginson, W.L, Privatization Trends and Major Deals in 2015 and 2016, in Privatization Barometer, The PB Report 2015/2016, Privatization Barometer, Milan, 2017, 2-26.
[5]	Buoye, T.M, Manslaughter, Markets, and Moral Economy in China; Violent Disputes over Property Rights in 18th-Century China, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
[6]	Edwards, C, Margaret Thatcher's Privatization Legacy, Cato Journal, 37 (1). 89-101. 2017.
[7]	Seymour, R, A Short History of Privatisation in the UK: 1979-2012, The Guardian, 29 March. 2012.
[8]	Malisase, R, Public Sector Reforms’ Contribution to Poor Public Service Delivery in Zambia: Poor Implementation or Defective Programmes? ZANGO: Zambian Journal of Contemporary Issues, 32 (2016). 59-76. Nov.2016.
[9]	Marx, K. and Engels, F, Selected Works, Vol. 3, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1973.
[10]	Marx, K, Wage Labour and Capital, Marxist.Org, [1891] (1999), [Online]. Available: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/Marx_W age_Labour_and_Capital.pdf (Accessed Jun. 2, 2019).
[11]	Lenin, V.I, The State and Revolution, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1973.
[12]	Mandel, E, An Introduction to Marxist Economic Theory, Resistance Books, Chippendale, 2002.
[13]	Fraser, A. and Lungu, J, For Whom the Windfalls? Winners and Losers in the Privatisation of Zambia's Copper Mines. Civil Society Trade Network of Zambia, Lusaka, 2007.
[14]	Saunders, M., Lewis, P., and Thornhill, A, Research Methods for Business Students, 7th Ed., Pearson Education Limited, London, 2016.
[15]	Fowler, F.J, Survey Research Methods, 8th Ed, SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, 2014.
[16]	Creswell, J.W, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th Ed, Sage Publications, Los Angeles, 2014.
[17]	Braun, V., and Clarke, V, “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77-101. Jan.2008.
[18]	Alshenqeeti, H, “Interviewing as a Data Collection Method: A Critical Review,” English Linguistics Research, 3 (1). 39-45. Mar.2014.
[19]	Bowen, G.A, Supporting a Grounded Theory with an Audit Trail: An Illustration, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12 (4). 305-316. Sep.2009.
[20]	O’Leary, Z, The Essential Guide to Doing Your Research Project, 2nd ed, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2014.
[21]	Anney, V.N, Ensuring the Quality of the Findings of Qualitative Research: Looking at Trustworthiness Criteria, Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS), 5 (2). 272-281. 2014.
[22]	Cooper, J, The Russian Economy Twenty Years after the End of the Socialist Economic System, Journal of Eurasian Studies, 4 (1). 55-64. Jan.2013.
[23]	Rakner, L, Political and Economic Liberalisation in Zambia: 1991-2001, Nordic Africa Institute, Stockholm, 2003.
[24]	Smith, C.D, Palestine and the Arab-Israel Conflict, Bedford, New York, 2006.
[25]	Mwambwa, S., Griffiths, A. and Kahler, A, A Fool’s Paradise? Zambia’s Mining Tax Regime. CTPD Policy Briefing Paper No.1, Centre for Trade Policy and Development, Lusaka, 2010.
[26]	Zambia Development Agency, Zambia Privatisation Status Report, Zambia Development Agency, Lusaka, 2010.
[27]	Central Statistical Office, 2019. 2018 Zambia Labour Force Survey Report, Central Statistical Office, Lusaka, 2019.
[28]	World Bank, Implementation Completion Report: Zambia Public Service Capacity Building Project, Report No: 34450, World Bank, Washington, D.C, 2005.
[29]	Republic of Zambia, The Zambia Development Agency Act, Government Printer, Lusaka, 2006.
[30]	Shezongo-Macmillan, J, Zambia: Justice Sector and the Rule of Law, A Review by AfriMAP and the Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa (OSISA), Johannesburg, 2013.
[31]	Ng’andu, B.K.E, 2019 National Budget Speech, National Assembly of Zambia, Lusaka, 2019.
[32]	Estrin, S. and Pelletier, A, Privatization in Developing Countries: What Are the Lessons of Recent Experience? The World Bank Research Observer, 33(1). 65-102. Feb.2018.
[33]	Mususa, P, Contesting Illegality: Women in the Informal Copper Business, in Fraser, A. and Larmer, M, Zambia, Mining and Neoliberalism: Boom and Bust on the Globalized Copperbelt, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2010, 185-204.
[34]	Mining for Zambia, A Case Study in Privatisation: Has Zambia Benefited from a Privatised Chibuluma? 2016, [Online]. Available: https://miningforzambia.com/a-case-study/ (Accessed Jun 2, 2019).
[35]	Mwinga, L.M, The Effects of Privatisation in Zambia: The Case of Five Kitwe Based Companies, Masters Disertation, Copperbelt University, Kitwe, 2003.
[36]	International Monetary Fund, Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and Data Files, International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C, 2012.
[37]	Lewis, M, Sweet Nothings: The Human Cost of a British Sugar Giant Avoiding Taxes in Southern Africa, Research Report, ActionAid, London, 2013.
[38]	Earle, J.S. and Gehlbach, S, Did Post-Communist Privatisation Increase Mortality? Comparative Economic Studies, 53 (2011). 239-260. May.2011.
[39]	Cook P. and Uchida, Y, Privatisation and Economic Growth in Developing Countries, The Journal of Development Studies, 39 (6). 121-154. Jun.2003.
[40]	Zambia Railways Limited, Five Year Strategic Plan for the Period 2014-2018, Zambia Railways Limited, Lusaka, 2013.
[41]	Quiggin, J, Electricity Privatisation in Australia: A Record of Failure, The Electrical Trades Union, Victoria, 2014.
[42]	Kasonde, E.G, 2002 Budget Address to the National Assembly, Government Printer, Lusaka, 2002.
[43]	Adams, S. and Mengistu, B, Privatization, Governance and Economic Development in Developing Countries, Journal of Developing Societies, 24 (4). 415-438. Sep.2009.
[44]	Serlemitsos, J. and Fusco, H, Zambia: Post-Privatisation Study, The World Bank, Washington, D.C, 2003.
[45]	British Broadcasting Corporation, “Zambia to Re-Think Privatisation,” British Broadcasting Corporation, February 2003. [Online]. Available: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/2749219.stm [Accessed Mar. 25, 2019].
[46]	Banda, D.A, The Trade Union Situation in Zambia: An Overview of the Law, Practice and the Way Forward: A Monogram, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Bonn, 1997.
[47]	Odiot and Gallet (2012) Odiot, A. and Gallet, A, Zambia: Good Copper, Bad Copper, Television Documentary, France Télévisions, Paris, 2012.
[48]	McKenzie, D. and Mookherjee, D, Distributive Impact of Privatization in Latin America: Evidence from Four Countries. The Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association - LACEA, 0 (20). 161-234. Jan.2003.