Prosocial Behavior and Moral Reasoning in Italian Adolescents and Young Adults

Maria Elvira De Caroli^1, , Rossella Falanga¹ and Elisabetta Sagone¹

¹Department of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

Cite this paper:
Maria Elvira De Caroli, Rossella Falanga and Elisabetta Sagone. Prosocial Behavior and Moral Reasoning in Italian Adolescents and Young Adults. Research in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 2(2):48-53. doi: 10.12691/rpbs-2-2-3

Abstract

This study analyzed the relationships between the inclination to help the others and prosocial moral reasoning (PMR) in a sample of 548 Italian adolescents and young adults. We used the Italian version of Prosocial Tendencies Measure to evaluate the tendencies to adopt prosocial behaviors in different conditions (public, anonymous, and helping behavior in emotionally critical and dire situations) and the two Italian versions of Prosocial Reasoning Objective Measure (respectively for adolescents and adults) in order to assess the general level (composite PMR) and the five typologies of PMR (hedonistic, needs oriented, approval oriented, stereotypical, and internalized prosocial moral reasoning). Results showed that girls scored higher than boys in helping behaviors in emotionally critical and dire situations, while boys scored higher than girls in public behaviors; furthermore, young adults expressed higher levels than adolescents in anonymous behaviors while adolescents scored higher than young adults in public behaviors. In relation to prosocial moral reasoning, girls expressed higher scores than boys in composite PMR and, specifically, in internalized and hedonistic PMR, while boys showed higher levels than girls in stereotypical, needs oriented, and approval oriented PMR. Moreover, young adults reached higher levels than adolescents in composite PMR, especially in internalized and hedonistic PMR; additionally, adolescents obtained higher levels than young adults in stereotypical, needs oriented, and approval oriented PMR. Significant relationships between prosocial behavior and PMR were found: the inclination to use helping behaviors in emotionally critical and dire situations was related positively to levels of composite PMR, especially to internalized PMR, but negatively to approval oriented PMR; public behaviors were related positively to approval and needs oriented PMR, but negatively to composite PMR and, specifically to internalized PMR. Future research will analyze the effects of these dimensions on other psychological constructs such as moral disengagement and value orientations in educational context.

Keywords:
prosocial behavior prosocial moral reasoning adolescents young adults

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Carlo, G. (Eds.). (2014). Prosocial Development: A multidimensional approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
[2]	Caprara, G. V., & Bonino S. (2006). Il comportamento prosociale. Aspetti individuali, familiari e sociali [Prosocial behavior. Individual, familiar, and social aspects]. Trento: Erikson.
[3]	Harter, S. (1999). The construction of the self: A developmental perspective. New York: Guilford.
[4]	Carlo, G., & Randall, B.A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 31-44.
[5]	Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) and N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 701-778). New York: Wiley.
[6]	Green, B., Shirk, S., Hanze, D., & Wanstrath, J. (1994). The Children’s Global Assessment Scale in clinical practice: An empirical evaluation. Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 33, 1158-1164.
[7]	Rydell, A. M., Hagekull, B., & Bohlin, G. (1997). Measurement of two social competence aspects in middle childhood. Developmental Psychology, 33, 824-833.
[8]	Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S., & Randall, B. A., (2003). Sociocognitive and Behavioral Correlates of a Measure of Prosocial Tendencies for Adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 23, 107-134.
[9]	De Caroli, M. E., & Sagone, E. (2013). Self-efficacy and Prosocial Tendencies in Italian Adolescents. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92, 239-245.
[10]	Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in children. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[11]	Eisenberg, N. (1979). Development of children’s prosocial moral judgment. Developmental Psychology, 15, 128-137.
[12]	Eisenberg-Berg, N. (1979). The development of children’s prosocial moral judgment. Developmental Psychology, 15, 128-137.
[13]	Carlo, G., Eisenberg, N., Knight, G. P. (1992). An objective measure of adolescents’ prosocial moral reasoning. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2, 331-349.
[14]	Eisenberg, N., Lennon, R., & Roth, K. (1983). Prosocial development: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 19, 846-855.
[15]	Eisenberg, N., Shell, R., Pasternack, J., Lennon, R., Beller, R., & Mathy, R.M. (1987). Prosocial development in middle childhood: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 23, 712-718.
[16]	Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., Shepard, S.A. (2005). Age changes in prosocial responding and moral reasoning in adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15, 235-260.
[17]	Eisenberg., N., Guthrie, I K., Murphy, B. C., Shepard, S. A., Cumberland, A., & Carlo, G. (1999). Consistency and development of prosocial dispositions: a longitudinal study. Child Development, 70, 1360-1372.
[18]	Eisenberg, N., Guthrie, I., Cumberland, A., Murphy, B. C., Shepard, S. A., Zhou, Q., & Carlo, G. (2002). Prosocial development in early adulthood: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 993-1006.
[19]	Eisenberg, N., Miller, P. A., Shell, R., McNalley, S., & Shea, C. (1991). Prosocial development in adolescence: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 27, 849-857.
[20]	Eisenberg, N., Hofer, C., Sulik, M. J., & Liew, J. (2014). The development of prosocial moral reasoning and a prosocial orientation in young adulthood: concurrent and longitudinal correlates. Developmental Psychology, 50, 58-70.
[21]	Carlo, G., Koller, S. H., Eisenberg, N., Da Silva, M. S., & Frohlich, C. B. (1996). A cross-national study on the relations among prosocial moral reasoning, gender role orientations and prosocial behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 32, 231-240.
[22]	Eisenberg, N., Zhou, Q., & Koller, S. (2001). Brazilian adolescents’ prosocial moral judgment and behavior: Relations to sympathy, perspective taking, gender-role orientation, and demographic characteristics. Child Development, 72, 518-534.
[23]	Falanga, R. (2010). Il ragionamento prosociale in adolescenza. Uno studio esplorativo nel contesto siciliano [Prosocial reasoning in adolescence. An esplorative study in Sicilian context]. In Annali della Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione-Università di Catania Vol. 7 (pp. 151-165). Catania: Università degli studi.
[24]	Lai, F. H. Y., Siu, A. M. H., Chan, C. C. H., & Shek, D. T. L. (2012). Measurement of prosocial reasoning among Chinese adolescents. The Scientific World Journal.
[25]	Azimpour, A., Neasi, A., Shehni-Yailagh, M., Arshadi, N., & Beshilde, K. (2013). Assessment prosocial moral reasoning on Iranian: Evaluation the measurement model and validation the measure of prosocial moral reasoning on Iranian university students. Journal of Life Science and Biomedicine, 3, 1, 10-15.
[26]	Hardy, S. A., & Carlo, G. (2005). Religiosity and prosocial behaviours in adolescence: the mediating role of prosocial values. Journal of Moral Education, 34, 2, 231-249.
[27]	Azimpour A., Neasi A., Shehni-Yailagh M., & Arshadi N. (2012). Validation of “Prosocial Tendencies Measure” in Iranian university students. Journal of Life Science and Biomedicine, 2, 34-42.
[28]	Falanga, R., De Caroli, M. E., & Sagone, E. (2014). Humor Styles, Self-efficacy and Prosocial Tendencies in Middle Adolescents, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 214-218.
[29]	Caprara, G. V., & Steca, P. (2005). Self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of prosocial behavior conducive to life satisfaction across ages. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 191-217.
[30]	Caprara, G.V., Alessandri, G., & Eisenberg, N. (2012). Prosociality: the contribution of traits, values, and self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1289-1303.