Determinants of School Choice in Selected Urban Secondary Schools in Zambia

Gift Masaiti¹, Kennedy Mwila¹, Godfrey Kaoma¹, Francis Simui^1, and Harrison Daka¹

¹School of Education, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

Cite this paper:
Gift Masaiti, Kennedy Mwila, Godfrey Kaoma, Francis Simui and Harrison Daka. Determinants of School Choice in Selected Urban Secondary Schools in Zambia. Research in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences. 2021; 9(1):1-8. doi: 10.12691/rpbs-9-1-1

Abstract

This research paper conceptualises the determinants of school choice by parents in selected secondary schools in urban Zambia. It empirically examines the extent school choice is determined by the following parameters: the school’s academic performance; parents’ socio-economic status; location of parents and moral and religious values of the schools. The rational choice and free market theories underpinned the conceptualisation of the determinants of school choice. Convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed. The study was done in Lusaka district based on the fact that it is the most urbanised town in the country. The study used both simple random sampling and purposive sampling to select respondents. 120 parents responded to questionnaires, 8 parents were interviewed to crosscheck other parents’ responses in the questionnaires. Interviews were also used to generate data from 6 head-teachers and 1 key informant at District Education Office. Multiple and single regression analysis were used to establish the significance of the factors of school choice under investigation. Key among the findings that show a departure from global literature in the context of Zambia is that of moral and religious values which was rated second and most significant determinant of School choice. Equally, school academic performance is the biggest determining factor in parents’ school choice. In the third place was Parents’ socio-economic status. Location of parents was however established to be insignificant as a determinant of school choice. The paper recommends that government should work at issues that enhanced school academic performance and discipline in schools such as intensifying monitoring and supervision especially in public schools so as to increase preference for such schools, Therefore, the study recommends for future research on examination of determinants of school choice should focus on primary level in both rural and urban settings.

Keywords:
determinants academic performance moral and religious values socio-economic status school choice

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Põder, K. and Kerem, K. (2012). School Choice and Educational Returns in the EU: With a Focus on Finland and Estonia. Baltic Journal of European Studies: Tallinn University of Technology.
[2]	Figlio, D. N. and Stone, J. A. (1997). School Choice and Student Performance: Are Private Schools Really Better? University of Oregon: Institute for Research on Poverty- Discussion Paper No. 1141-97.
[3]	Simwatachela-Simui, R, Simui, F., Kakana, F., Manchishi, P.C. (2020). Deconstructing quality education in public secondary schools through the lenses of teachers in Lusaka district, Zambia. International Journal of Academic Research and Development. 5 (3); 103-112.
[4]	Keating, R.J. (2015). School Choice and Economic Growth: A Research Synthesis on How Market Forces Can Fuel Educational Attainment. The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice – edchoice.org.
[5]	Ministry of Education. (1996). Educating our Future. Lusaka: Ministry of Education
[6]	Kaoma, G, K (2016). Determinants Of School Choice: Understanding How Parents Choose Secondary Schools In Lusaka District. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Determinants-of-school-choice%3A-understanding-how-in-Kaoma/2358b91516c54441ca9defb9c7bd662b878f8b32.
[7]	Ministry of Education. (2010). Review of the re-entry policy.
[8]	Bosetti, L. (2004). Determinants of School Choice: Understanding how parents choose elementary schools in Alberta. University of Calgary: Journal of Education Policy, 19, 4.
[9]	Fuller, B., Elmore, R. & Orfield, G. (1996) Policy-making in the dark: illuminating the school choice debate, in: B. B. Fuller, R. Elmore & G. Orfield (Eds) Who chooses? Who loses? (NY, Teachers College Press), 1-21.
[10]	Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[11]	Schneider, M., Marschall, M., Teske, P. and Roch, C. (1998). “School Choice and Culture Wars in the Classroom: What Different Parents Seek from Education.” Social Science Quarterly 79 (3): 489-501.
[12]	Olson Beal, H. K. and Hendry, P.M. (2012). The Ironies of School Choice: Empowering Parents and Reconceptualizing Public Education. The University of Chicago Press: American Journal of Education, Vol. 118, No. 4, pp. 521-550.
[13]	Nichols, A. and Ozek, U. (2010). Public School Choice and Student Achievement in the District of Columbia. The Urban Institute: CALDER (National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research).
[14]	Lauen, D. L. (2009). To Choose or Not to Choose: High School Choice and Graduation in Chicago. American Educational Research Association: Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 3, 179-199.
[15]	Simui F. (2018). Lived Experiences of Students with Visual Impairments at Sim University in Zambia: A Hermeneutic Phenomelogical Approach Lusaka: University of Zambia, Unpublished PhD Thesis.
[16]	Simui F, Kasonde-Ngandu S, Cheyeka AM, Simwinga J, Ndhlovu D. (2018). Enablers and disablers to academic success of students with visual impairment: A 10-year literature disclosure, 2007-201. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 36(2): 163-174.
[17]	Simui F, Kasonde-Ngandu S, Nyaruwata LT. (2017). ICT as an Enabler to Academic Success of Students with Visually Impaired at Sim University: Hermeneutics Approach.” Zambia Information Communication Technology (ICT) Journal, 1(1): 5-9.
[18]	Lauen, D. L. (2007). Contextual Explanations of School Choice. American Sociological Association: Sociology of Education, 80, 3, 179-209.
[19]	Schneider, M., Teske, P., Marschall, M., Mintrom, M. and Roch, C. (1997a). “Institutional Arrangements and the Creation of Social Capital: The Effects of Public School Choice.” American Political Science Review 91 (1): 82-93.
[20]	Corwin, R. and Schneider, E. J. (2005). The School Choice Hoax: Fixing America’s Schools. Westport, CT: Praeger.
[21]	Labaree, D. F. (2000). “No Exit: Education as an Inescapably Public Good.” In Reconstructing the Common Good in Education, ed. Larry Cuban and Dorothy Shipps. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
[22]	Hoxby, C. (Ed.). (2003). The economics of school choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[23]	Loeb, S., Valant, J. and Kasman, M. (2011). Increasing Choice in the Market for Schools: Recent Reforms and Their Effects on Student Achievement. Stanford: Stanford University (National Tax Journal), March 2011, 64 (1), 141-164.
[24]	Asadullah, M. N., Chakrabarti, R. and Chaudhury, N. (2012). What Determines Religious School Choice? Theory and Evidence from Rural Bangladesh. Bonn: The Institute for the Study of Labour (IZA)- Discussion Paper No. 6883.
[25]	Levin, H. (2012). A comprehensive framework for evaluating educational vouchers, Occasional Paper No. 5. National Centre for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.
[26]	Masaiti, G. (2015). Effectiveness and viability of Revenue Diversification in Sub-Saharan Africa’s Higher Education: Examining Zambia’s Public Universities. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 2015, 2 (5), 33-44.
[27]	Masaiti, G. (2015). Shifting from Government Bursaries to a Loan Scheme in Higher Education: Exploring the Zambian Experience in Student Financial Aid. International Journal of African Higher Education. Vol. 2 (2015)
[28]	Masaiti, G., Mwelwa, K & Mwale, N. (2016). Shifting from Government Bursaries to a Loan Scheme in Higher Education: Exploring the Zambian Experience in Student Financial Aid. International Journal of African Higher Education. Vol. 2 (2), 56-71.
[29]	Kelly, M, J. (1991). Education in a Declining Economy: The Case of Zambia. Washington: World Bank.
[30]	Masaiti, G. (2018). Education in Zambia at Fifty Years of Independence and Beyond: History, Current Status and Contemporary Issues, UNZA Press, Lusaka.
[31]	Masaiti, G. (2014). Unpublished Lecture Notes. Lusaka: The University of Zambia.
[32]	Creswell, J. W., and Clark, P. V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE publications.
[33]	Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[34]	Goldring E. and K.J. Rowley. (2006). Parent Preferences and Parent Choices: The Public-Private Decision about School Choice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco California (April 8, 2006).
[35]	Ahmed, H., S. Amjad, M. Habib and S.A. Shah. (2013). Determinants of School Choice: Evidence from Rural Punjab, Pakistan. Lahore School of Economics- CREB Working Paper No. 01-13.