Comparative Anatomy of Some Ficus Species

Adeniyi I.M.^1, , Adejoba O.R.¹, Alao O.J.¹, Noah A.S.² and Salaudeen G.T.¹

¹Department of Forest Products Development and Utilization, Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria P.M.B 5054, Forest Hill, Jericho Estate, Ibadan, Oyo-State of Nigeria

²Federal College of Forestry, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria

Cite this paper:
Adeniyi I.M., Adejoba O.R., Alao O.J., Noah A.S. and Salaudeen G.T.. Comparative Anatomy of Some Ficus Species. Research in Plant Sciences. 2013; 1(2):15-19. doi: 10.12691/plant-1-2-2

Abstract

The wood anatomy of seven species of Ficus: F. ingens, F. exasperata, F. vallischoudae, F. vogelina, F. muccuso, F. elastica and F. indica of Moraceae from Nigeria was investigated and described. Some interesting observations were made about the genus which distinguished the wood species under study from one another, such features include crystals and silica inclusions; sizes of rays, vessels and fibres. F. elasitca possessed narrowest rays and lacked any crystal inclusion. F.ingens had few fibres and possessed silica aggregates. Fibres were abundant in F. vallischoudae as observed at the transverse section. F. exasperata contained the smallest vessel size and its pores were more abundant than any of the other wood species under study, but fewer vessels were observed in F. muccuso, and F. indica. Septate fibres were observed in F. vallischoudae and F. vogelina. Rhomboidal crystals were observed in all the wood species except in F. elasitca, though they were rare in F. vogelina and F.muccuso. These anatomical features were therefore brought to the fore as possible taxonomic significance and diagnostic value. Photo micrographs prepared from three sections namely transverse section, tangential longitudinal section and radial longitudinal section were also presented in this study.

Keywords:
features crystals rays fibres species vessels

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

References:

[1]	Brian, B. and Peter, H. 2012. Wood identification for hardwood and softwood species native to Tennesse. Agricultural Extension Service, The University of Tennesse. http://web.utk.edu/~tfpc/.
[2]	Ademiluyi, E.O. and Badejo, S.O.O. 1986. Strength properties of wood and the development in uses of indigenous Nigerian forest species. Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria. 33p.
[3]	John Bandon 2003. Buliders guide to aircraft materials properties of wood, R.A-AusWEB. pp 93.
[4]	Ficus. www.kew.org/ficus-benghalensis.htm
[5]	Keay, R.W.J; Onochie, C.F.A.; and Stanfield 1964. Nigerian tree. Federal Department of Forestry Research, Ibadan.Volume II. Pp 16-187.
[6]	Hutchinson, J. and Dalziel, 1963. Flora of West Africa, Volume II, 2nd edition.
[7]	Keay, R.W. J. 1989. Trees of Nigeria, Clarendon Press Oxford. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.
[8]	Gierok Kate 2011. Ficus identification. Fotolia. com. http//www.ehow.com/m/about.
[9]	Ogunkunle, A.T.J. and Oladele, F.A. 2008. Structural dimensions and paper making potentials of the wood in some Nigerian speicies of Ficus L. (Moraceae). Advance in Natural and Applied Sciences, 2(3): 103-111.
[10]	http://botanical.com/site/column.poudhia/14bar.html.